Assessments of sustainable waste management alternatives: How to support complex knowledge management

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 21-39

  Söderberg, Henriette ^a   Kain, Jaan Henrik ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE; MANAGEMENT PRACTICE; SUSTAINABILITY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 31344476824     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560500372982     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alkan Olsson, J. (2003) Setting Limits in Nature and the Metabolism of Knowledge. Linköping: Linköping University. Linköping Studies in Art and Science 274
2. Bell, S. and Morse, S. (1999) Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable. London: Earthscan.
3. Brindley, T. and Rydin, Y. and Stoker, G.(1989) Remaking Planning: The Politics of Urban Change in the Thatcher Years. London: Unwin Hyman.
4. (2002) Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux. Aldershot: Ashgate.
5. CSD (Commission on Sustainable Development). (1996) Indicators of Sustainable Development: Framework and Methodologies. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/indisd/english/ english.htm
6. CSD (Commission on Sustainable Development).(2003) Theme Indicator Framework. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/sustdev/natlinfo/indicators/isdms2001/table_4.htm
7. Chambers, R. (1997) Whose Reality Counts? Putting the First Last. London: IT Publications.
8. Chappells, H. and Klintman, M. and Lindén, A- and Shove, E. and Spaargaren, G. and van Vliet, B. (2000) Domestic consumption utility services and the environment. Universities of Lancaster, Wageningen and Lund. Final DOMUS Report, February
9. Corell, E. (1999) The Negotiable Desert. Expert Knowledge in the Negotiations of the Convention to Combat Desertification. Linköping: Linköping University. Linköping Studies in Art and Science 191
10. EEA. (2002) Environmental signals 2002-Benchmarking the millennium. Copenhagen: EEA. Environmental assessment report No. 9
11. Eriksson, J. (2003) Kretsloppssamhälle - Från teori till praktik. En studie av Göteborgs kretsloppsnämnd [Recycling society-from theory to practice. A study of Gothenburg's Recycling Board]. Norrköping Campus: Linköping University, Department of Thematic Studies.
12. Friedmann, J. (1987) Planning in the Public Domain: From Knowledge to Action. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Friend, J. and Hickling, A. (1997) Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
14. GAO (US General Accounting Office). (1990) Case Study Evaluations. Washington DC: GAO-Program Evaluation and Methodology Division.
15. Graham, S. and Marvin, S.(2001) Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition. London: Routledge.
16. (2001) Urban Infrastructure in Transition: Networks, Building, Plans. London: Earthscan.
17. Hacking, I. (1999) The Social Construction of What. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Healey P. (1997) Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies. Hong Kong: Macmillan Press.
19. Healey, P. and Cars, G. and Madanipour, A. and de Magalhaes, C.(2002) Transforming governance, institutionalist analysis and institutional capacity. In Urban Governance, Institutional Capacity and Social Milieux. Aldershot: Ashgate.
20. Holden, E. (1998) Planning theory: Democracy or sustainable development?-both (but don't bother about the bread, please) Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research, 15, pp. 227-247.
21. Innes, J. (2004) Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics Planning Theory, 3(1), pp. 5-20.
22. Innes, J. and Booher, D.(2003) Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In Deliberative Policy Analysis: Understanding Governance in the Network Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kain, J-.(2003) Sociotechnical Knowledge: An Operationalized Approach to Localised Infrastructure Planning and Sustainable Urban Development. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Built Environment and Sustainable Development.
24. Kain, J- and Söderberg, H.(2002) LOKOMOTIV-Motiv för lokalt organiserade kretslopp i Bergsjön. En studie om avfallshantering [LOCOMOTIVE-Motives for Locally Organized Cycles in Bergsjön. A Study in Waste Management]. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Built Environment and Sustainable Development. Report 2002: 12
25. Kain, J- and Söderberg, H.(2005) Management of complex knowledge in planning for sustainable urban development. In. The International Conference for Integrating Urban Knowledge & Practice, Gothenburg May 29-June 3, 2005.
26. Koelble, T. (1995) The new institutionalism in organizational analysis Comparative Politics, 27, pp. 231 - 243.
27. Lindblom, C. (1959) The science of 'muddling through' Public Administration Review, 19, pp. 79 - 88.
28. Ljung, M.(2001) Collaborative Learning for Sustainable Development of Agri-Food Systems. Uppsala: Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Landscape Planning. Agraria 308
29. Pawson, R. and Tilley, N.(1997) Realistic Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
30. Pregernig, M. (2002) Perceptions, not facts: How forestry professionals decide on the restoration of degraded forest ecosystems Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 45(1), pp. 25 - 38.
31. Ramirez, J.(2002) Strukturer och livsformer [Structures and Life Modes] (Forskarkooperativet dia-L-O-G-O-S).
32. Rossi, P. and Freeman, H. and Lipsey, M.(1999) Evaluation: A Systematic Approach, 6th edn.. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
33. Rydhagen, B.(2002) Feminist sanitary engineering as a participatory alternative in South Africa and Sweden. Blekinge Institute of Technology, Department of Human Work Sciences and Media Technology. Dissertation Series No. 2002:06
34. Rydin, Y. and Holman, N. and Hands, V. and Sommer, F. (2003) Incorporating sustainable development concerns into an urban regeneration project: How politics can defeat procedures Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(4), pp. 545 - 561.
35. Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H.(1993) Policy Change and Learning - An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder CO: Westview Press.
36. Scott, R.(1995) Institutions and Organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
37. Söderberg, H. and Kain, J-.(2002) Integrating knowledge or aggregating data-multi-criteria approaches for sustainable water and waste systems. In Proceedings 3rd International Conference on Decision-Making in Urban and Civil Engineering, London, 6-8 November
38. (2003) Methodologies for integration of knowledge areas. The case of sustainable urban water management. Gothenburg: Chalmers University of Technology, Department of Built Environment and Sustainable Development. Report 2003:15
39. Spangenberg, J. and Bonniot, O.(1998) Sustainable Indicators: A Compass on the Road Towards Sustainability. Wuppertal: Wuppertal Institute.
40. Street, P. (1997) Scenario workshops: A participatory approach to sustainable urban living Futures, 29(2), pp. 139 - 158.
41. Strömberg, K. and Kain, J.-.(2005) Communicative learning, democracy and effectiveness: Facilitating private-public decision-making in Sweden. In Planning Under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach, 3rd edn..Oxford: Elsevier Architectural Press.
42. Ulrich, W.(1996) Critical systems thinking for citizens. Hull: University of Hull, The Centre for Systems Studies. A research proposal, Research Memorandum No. 10
43. Yin, R.(1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.