Judicial review of risk assessment: Substance or procedure?

Risk, Decision and Policy

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 123-129

  Applegate, John S ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31344464081     PISSN: 13575309     EISSN: 14664534     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1357530901000333     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Abraham, K. and Merrill, R. (1986) Scientific Uncertainty and the courts, Issues in Science and Technology, 93 (Winter).
2. Cross, F. (2000) Pragmatic Pathologies of judicial review of administrative rulemaking, North Carolina Law Review, 78: 1013.
3. Latin, H. (1988) Good science, bad regulation, and toxic risk assessment, Yale Journal on Regulation, 5: 89.
4. McGarity, T. (1992) Some thoughts on deossifying the rulemaking process, Duke Law Journal, 41: 1385.
5. National Research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process.
6. National Research Council (1994) Science and judgment in risk assessment.
7. National Research Council (1996) Understanding risk: informing decisions in a democratic society.
8. Presidential/Congressional Commission on Risk Assessment and Management (1997), Risk assessment and risk management in regulatory decision-making.
9. US Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Proposed guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment, Federal Register, 61: 17960.
10. Wagner, W. (1995) The science charade in toxic risk regulation, Columbia Law Review, 95: 1613.
11. Wald, P. (1994) Regulation at risk: are courts part of the solution or most of the problem?, Southern California Law Review, 67: 621.