Measuring surgical recovery: The study of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy

American Journal of Transplantation

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 2489-2495

  Bergman, Simon ^a   Feldman, Liane S ^a   Mayo, Nancy E ^a   Carli, Franco ^a   Anidjar, Maurice ^a   Klassen, Dennis R ^a   Andrew, Christopher G ^a   Vassiliou, Melina C ^a   Stanbridge, Donna D ^a   Fried, Gerald M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

6 min walk test; Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy; Quality of life; Surgical recovery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONVALESCENCE; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC LIVE DONOR NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MENTAL COMPONENT SUMMARY SCORE; NEPHRECTOMY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PHYSICAL COMPONENT SUMMARY SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOSOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE; SCORING SYSTEM; SELF EVALUATION; SHORT FORM 36; STANDARD; STANDARDIZATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; WALKING; DONOR; EXERCISE TEST; GRAFT SURVIVAL; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONOR; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRON; PATHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; EXERCISE TEST; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; NEPHRONS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH DESIGN; TIME FACTORS; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TISSUE DONORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING;

EID: 31344461091     PISSN: 16006135     EISSN: 16006143     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01054.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Matas AJ Bartlett ST Leichtman AB et al. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: survey of United States transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2003 3 : 830 834.
2. Philosophe B Kuo PC Schweitzer EJ et al. Laparoscopic versus open donor nephrectomy: comparing ureteral complications in the recipients and improving the laparoscopic technique. Transplantation 1999 68 : 497 502.
3. Troppmann C Ormond DB Perez RV. Laparoscopic (vs open) live donor nephrectomy: a UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 2003 3 : 1295 1301.
4. Handschin AE Weber M Demartines N et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Br J Surg 2003 90 : 1323 1332.
5. Hiller J Sroka M Weber R et al. Identifying donor concerns to increase live organ donation. J Transpl Coord 1998 8 : 51 54.
6. Flowers JL Jacobs S Cho E et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997 226 : 483 489.
7. Lind MY Liem YS Bemelman WA et al. Live donor nephrectomy and return to work: does the operative technique matter¿ Surg Endosc 2003 17 : 591 595.
8. Lorenz W Troidl H Solomkin JS et al. Second step: testing-outcome measurements. World J Surg 1999 23 : 768 780.
9. Carli F Mayo N. Measuring the outcome of surgical procedures: what are the challenges¿ Br J Anaest 2001 87 : 531 533.
10. Finch E Brooks D Stratford PW et al. Physical rehabilitation outcome measures: a guide to enchanced clinical decision making. Second Ed. Hamilton : BC Decker, 2002.
11. Breivik EK Bjornsson GA Skovlund E. A comparison of pain rating scales by sampling from clinical trial data. Clin J Pain 2000 16 : 22 28.
12. Bijur PE Latimer CT Gallagher EJ. Validation of a verbally administered numerical rating scale of acute pain for use in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2003 10 : 390 392.
13. Price DD Bush FM Long S et al. A comparison of pain measurement characteristics of mechanical visual analogue and simple numerical rating scales. Pain 1994 56 : 217 226.
14. Laboratories ATSCoPSfCPF. ATS statement: guidelines for the six-minute walk test. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2002 166 : 111 117.
15. Langenfeld H Schneider B Grimm W et al. The six-minute walk-an adequate exercise test for pacemaker patients¿ Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 1990 13 : 1761 1765.
16. Belza B Steele BG Hunziker J et al. Correlates of physical activity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Nurs Res 2001 50 : 195 202.
17. O'Keeffe ST Lye M Donnellan C et al. Reproducibility and responsiveness of quality of life assessment and six minute walk test in elderly heart failure patients. Heart 1998 80 : 377 382.
18. Redelmeier DA Bayoumi AM Goldstein RS et al. Interpreting small differences in functional status: the Six Minute Walk test in chronic lung disease patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1997 155 : 1278 1282.
19. Ware JE Kosinski M Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Lincoln, RI : Quality Metric Incorporated, 2003.
20. Ware JE Kosinski M Keller SD. SF-36 physical and mental summary scales: a user's manual. Boston, MA : The Health Institute, New England Medical Center, 1994.
21. Froom P Melamed S Nativ T et al. Low job satisfaction predicts delayed return to work after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Occup Environ Med 2001 43 : 657 662.
22. Jones KR Burney RE Peterson M et al. Return to work after inguinal hernia repair. Surgery 2001 129 : 128 135.
23. Ross AP. Incidence of inguinal hernia recurrence. Effect of time off work after repair. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 1975 57 : 326 328.
24. Bisgaard T Klarskov B Rosenberg J et al. Factors determining convalescence after uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 2001 136 : 917 921.
25. Barkun JS Keyser EJ Wexler MJ et al. Short-term outcomes in open vs. laparoscopic herniorrhaphy: confounding impact of worker's compensation on convalescence. J Gastrointest Surg 1999 3 : 575 582.
26. Wolf JS, Jr.. Merion RM Leichtman AB et al. Randomized controlled trial of hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open surgical live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001 72 : 284 290.
27. El-Galley R Hood N Young CJ et al. Donor nephrectomy: a comparison of techniques and results of open, hand assisted and full laparoscopic nephrectomy. J Urol 2004 171 : 40 43.
28. Khauli RB Hussein M Shaar A et al. A prospective evaluation of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open donor nephrectomy. Transpl Proc 2003 35 : 2552.
29. Moore FD. Getting well: the biology of surgical convalescence. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1958 73 : 387 400.
30. Carli F Mayo N Klubien K et al. Epidural analgesia enhances functional exercise capacity and health-related quality of life after colonic surgery: results of a randomized trial. Anesthesiology 2002 97 : 540 549.
31. Enright PL Sherrill DL. Reference equations for the six-minute walk in healthy adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 1998 158 : 1384 1387.
32. Guyatt GH Pugsley SO Sullivan MJ et al. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax 1984 39 : 818 822.
33. Topcu O Karakayali F Kuzu MA et al. Comparison of long-term quality of life after laparoscopic and open cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 2003 17 : 291 295.
34. Velanovich V. Comparison of symptomatic and quality of life outcomes of laparoscopic versus open antireflux surgery. Surgery 1999 126 : 782 788.
35. Neumayer L Giobbie-Hurder A Jonasson O et al. Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 2004 350 : 1819 1827.
36. Thaler K Dinnewitzer A Mascha E et al. Long-term outcome and health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open colectomy for benign disease. Surg Endosc 2003 17 : 1404 1408.
37. Nguyen NT Goldman C Rosenquist CJ et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastric bypass: a randomized study of outcomes, quality of life, and costs. Ann Surg 2001 234 : 279 289.
38. Perry KT Freedland SJ Hu JC et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003 169 : 2018 2021.
39. Hopman WM Towheed T Anastassiades T et al. Canadian normative data for the SF-36 health survey. Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group. CMAJ 2000 163 : 265 271.
40. Pace KT Dyer SJ Stewart RJ et al. Health-related quality of life after laparoscopic and open nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2003 17 : 143 152.