Spatial learning based on the shape of the environment is influenced by properties of the objects forming the shape

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 44-59

  Graham, Moira ^a,b   Good, Mark A ^a,b   McGregor, Anthony ^a,b   Pearce, John M ^a,b  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Geometric module; Overshadowing; Potentiation; Spatial learning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ENVIRONMENT; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHYSIOLOGY; RAT;

ANIMALS; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENT; FORM PERCEPTION; LEARNING; MALE; RATS; SPACE PERCEPTION; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 31344457958     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.32.1.44     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bouton, M. E., Dunlap, C. M., & Swartzentruber, D. (1987). Potentiation of taste by another taste during compound aversion learning. Animal Learning and Behavior, 15, 433-438.
2. Bouton, M. E., Jones, D. L., McPhillips, S. A., & Swartzentruber, D. (1986). Potentiation and overshadowing in odor-aversion learning: Role of method of odor presentation, the distal-proximal cue distinction, and the conditionability of odor. Learning and Motivation, 17, 115-138.
3. Cheng, K. (1986). A purely geometric module in the rat's spatial representation. Cognition, 23, 149-178.
4. Cheng, K., & Gallistel, R. C. (2005). Shape parameters explain data from spatial transformations: Comment on Pearce et al. (2004) and Tommasi & Polli (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 31, 254-259.
5. Cheng, K., & Newcombe, N. S. (2005). Is there a geometric module for spatial orientation? Squaring theory and evidence. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 1-23.
6. Esber, G. R., McGregor, A., Good, M. A., Hayward, A., & Pearce, J. M. (2005). Transfer of spatial behaviour controlled by a landmark array with a distinctive shape. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58B, 69-91.
7. Gallistel, C. R. (1990). The organization of learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Gray, E. R., Bloomfield, L. L., Ferrey, A., Spetch, M. L., & Sturdy, B. (2005). Spatial encoding in mountain chickadees: Features overshadow geometry. Biology Letters, 1, 314-317.
9. Hayward, A., Good, M. A., & Pearce, J. M. (2004). Failure of a landmark to restrict spatial learning based on the shape of the environment. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57B, 289-314.
10. Hayward, A., McGregor, A., Good, M. A., & Pearce, J. M. (2003). Absence of overshadowing and blocking between landmarks and geometric cues provided by the shape of a test arena. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56B, 114-126.
11. Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E. S., & Katsnelson, A. S. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3-36.
12. Kelly, D. M., Spetch, M. L., & Heth, C. D. (1998). Pigeons (Columba livia) encoding of geometric and featural properties of a spatial environment. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 112, 259-269.
13. Mackintosh, N. J. (1976). Overshadowing and stimulus intensity. Animal Learning and Behavior, 4, 186-192.
14. Margules, J., & Gallistel, R. (1988). Heading in the rat: Determination by environmental shape. Animal Learning and Behavior, 16, 404-410.
15. McGregor, A., Jones, P. M., Good, M. A., & Pearce, J. M. (in press). Further evidence that rats rely on local rather than global spatial information to locate a hidden goal: Reply to Cheng and Gallistel (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes.
16. Morris, R. G. M., & Spooner, R. I. W. (1990). Watermaze software [Computer software]. Edinburgh, Scotland: Aztermaze Software.
17. Newcombe, N. S. (2002). The nativist-empiricist controversy in the context of recent research on spatial and quantitative development. Psychological Science, 13, 395-401.
18. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model for stimulus generalization in Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 94, 61-73.
19. Pearce, J. M., Good, M. A., Jones, P. M., & McGregor, A. (2004). Transfer of spatial behavior between different environments: Implications for theories of spatial learning and for the role of the hippocampus in spatial learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 30, 135-147.
20. Pearce, J. M., Ward-Robinson, J., Good, M., Fussell, C., & Aydin, A. (2001). Influence of a beacon on spatial learning based on the shape of the test environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 329-344.
21. Rescorla, R. A., & Durlach, P. (1981). Within-event learning in Pavlovian conditioning. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 81-111). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
22. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning: II. Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
23. Rusiniak, K., Hankins, W., Garcia, J., & Brett, L. (1979). Flavor-illness aversions: Potentiation of odor by taste in rats. Behavioral and Neural Biology, 25, 1-17.
24. Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2002). Modularity and spatial reorientation in a simple mind: Encoding of geometric and nongeometric properties of a spatial environment by fish. Cognition, 85, 51-59.
25. Sovrano, V. A., Bisazza, A., & Vallortigara, G. (2003). Modularity as a fish (Xenotoca eiserni) views it: Conjoining geometric and nongeometric information for spatial representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 29, 199-210.
26. Tommasi, L., & Polli, C. (2004). Representation of two geometric features of the environment in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Animal Cognition, 7, 53-59.
27. Tomassi, L., & Vallortigara, G. (2000). Searching for the center: Spatial cognition in the domestic chick (Gallus gallus). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 477-486.
28. Vallortigara, G., Zanforlin, M., & Pasti, G. (1990). Geometric modules in animals' spatial representations: A test with chicks (Gallus gallus domesticus). Journal of Comparative Psychology, 104, 248-254.
29. Wang, R. F., & Spelke, E. S. (2002). Human spatial representation: Insights from animals. Trends in Cognitive Science, 6, 376-382.