Map design evaluation for mobile display

Cartography and Geographic Information Science

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 285-301

  Dillemuth, Julie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAND HELD COMPUTERS; MAPS; NAVIGATION SYSTEMS; PERSONAL DIGITAL ASSISTANTS;

DIGITAL MAPS; HANDHELD MOBILE DEVICES; MAP DESIGN;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

MAP; SPATIAL DATA;

EID: 31344455330     PISSN: 15230406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1559/152304005775194773     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Agrawala, M., and C. Stolte. 2001. Rendering effective route maps: Improving usability through generalization. In: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, Los Angeles, California. pp. 241-9.
2. Aretz, A. J., and C. D. Wickens. 1992. The mental rotation of map displays. Human Performance 5 (4): 303-8.
3. Bishop, I. 1994. The role of visual realism in communicating and understanding spatial change and process. In: H. M. Hearnshaw and D. J. Unwin (eds), Visualization in Geographical Information System. Chichester, West Sussex, England: Wiley & Sons. pp. 60-4.
4. Blades, M., and C. Spencer. 1987. How do people use maps to navigate through the world? Cartographica 24 (3):64-75.
5. Bornträger, C., K. Cheverst, N. Davies, A. Dix, A. Friday, and J. Seitz. 2003. Experiments with multimodal interfaces in a context-aware city guide. In: L. Chittaro (ed), Mobile HCI 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin, Gernmay: Springer-Verlag. pp. 116-30.
6. Clarke, K. 2004. Mobile mapping and geographic information systems. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 31(3):131-6.
7. Edwardes, A., D. Burghardt, M. Bobzien, L. Harrie, L. Lehto, T. Reichenbacher, M. Sester, and R. Weibel. 2003. Map generalisation technology: Addressing the need for a common research platform. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference, Durban, South Africa. pp. 170-80.
8. Hampe, M., and B. Elias. 2004. Integrating topographic information and landmarks for mobile applications. In: Location Based Services and Telecartography, Proceedings of the Symposium 2004, Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Nr. 66, TU Wien, Austria, 2003. pp. 147-55.
9. Hampe, M., and M. Sester. 2002. Real-time integration and generalization of spatial data for mobile applications. In: Maps and the Internet 2002, Geowissenschaftliche Mitteilungen, Heft Nr 60, Schriftenreihe der Studienrichtung Vermessungwesen and Geoinformation Technische: Universität Wien. [http://www.ikg.uni-hannover.de/publikationen/].
10. Hegarty, M., A. E. Richardson, D. R. Montello, K. Lovelace, and I. Subbiah. 2002. Development of a self-report measure of environmental spatial ability. Intelligence 30:425-47.
11. Kray, C., C. Elting, K. Laasko, and V. Coors. 2003. Presenting route instructions on mobile devices. In: Proeedings. of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Miami, Florida. pp. 117-24.
12. Meng, L. 2003. Missing theories and methods in digital cartography. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference (CDROM), Durban, South Africa.
13. Montello, D. R., K. L. Lovelace, R. G. Golledge, and C. M. Self. 1999. Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89 (3):515-34.
14. Nivala, A.-M., and L. T. Sarjakoski. 2003. Need for context-aware topographic maps in mobile devices. In: Proceedings of the 9th Scandinavian Research Conference on Geographic Information Science (ScanGIS 2003), Espoo, Finland. pp. 15-19.
15. Patterson, T. 2002. Getting real: Reflecting on the new look of National Park Service maps. International Cartography Association (ICA), 2002 Mountain Cartography Workshop, Timberline Lodge, Mt. Hood, Oregon. [http://www.shadedrelief.com/realism/].
16. Prestopnik, J. L., and B. Roskos-Ewoldsen. 2000. The relations among wayfinding strategy use, sense of direction, sex, familiarity and wayfinding ability. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20:177-91.
17. Reichenbacher, T. 2001. The world in your pocket - Towards a mobile cartography. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Cartographic Conference (CDROM), Beijing, China.
18. Reichenbacher, T. 2003. Adaptive methods for mobile cartography. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference, Durban, South Africa. pp. 1311-21.
19. Reichenbacher, T. 2004. Mobile cartography - Adaptive visualisation of geographic information on mobile devices. PhD Dissertation, Technical University of Munich. [http://tumb1.biblio.tu-muenchen.de/publ/diss/bv/ 2004/reichenbacher.html]. Munich, Germany.
20. Sholl, M. J., J. C. Acacio, R. O. Makar, and C. Leon. 2000. The relation of sex and sense of direction to spatial orientation in an unfamiliar environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology 20:17-28.
21. Suomela, R., K. Roimela, and J. Lehikoinen. 2003. The evolution of perspective view in walkmap. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 7:249-62.
22. Urquhart, K., W. Cartwright, S. Miller, K. Mitchell, C. Quirion, and P. Benda. 2003. Ensuring useful cartographic representations in location-based services. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Cartographic Conference, Durban, South Africa. pp. 2591-2602.
23. Visvalingam, M. 1994. Visualization in GIS, cartography and ViSC. In: H. M. Hearnshaw and D. J. Unwin (eds), Visualization in Geographical Information Systems. Chichester, West Sussex, England: Wiley & Sons. pp. 18-25.
24. Warren, D. H., and T E. Scott. 1993. Map alignment in traveling multisegment routes. Environment and Behavior 25 (5):643-66.