The roles of web feature and web map services in real-time geospatial data sharing for time-critical applications

Cartography and Geographic Information Science

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 269-283

  Zhang, Chuanrong ^a   Li, Weidong ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN WHITEWATER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MAPPING; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; OPEN SYSTEMS; REAL TIME SYSTEMS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

REAL TIME GEOSPATIAL DATA SHARING; WEB FEATURE SERVICES (WFS); WEB MAP SERVICES (WMS);

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS;

MAPPING; SPATIAL DATA; WORLD WIDE WEB;

EID: 31344455327     PISSN: 15230406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1559/152304005775194728     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Anderson, G., and S. R. Moreno. 2003. Building web-based spatial information solutions around open specifications and open source software. Transactions in GIS 7(4): 447-66.
2. Bayer, C. T. H., and H. Onsrud. 2004. Ontological development as appropriate precursor to land transfer system design. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Aldephi, Maryland, October 20-23. pp. 14-16.
3. Brodeur, J., Y. Bedard, G. Edwards, and B. Moulin. 2003. Revisiting the concept of geospatial data interoperability within the scope of human communication processes. Transactions in GIS 7(2): 242-65.
4. Choicki, J. 1999. Constraint-based interoperability of spatiotemporal databases. Geoinformatica 3(3): 211-43.
5. CÖMERT, C. 2004. Web services and national spatial data infrastructure (NSDI). In: Proceedings of Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents, XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, Commission 4, July 12-23. [http://www.isprs.org/istanbul2004/comm4/papers/365.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
6. Cruz, I.F., W. Sunna, and A. Chaudhry. 2004. Semi-automatic ontology alignment for geospatial data integration. In: Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 3234: 67-80.
7. Di, L. 2004. Distributed geospatial information services - architectures, standards, and research issues. In: Proceedings of Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents, XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, Commission 2, July 12-23.[http://www.isprs.org/istanbul2004/comm2/papers/ 121.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
8. Egenhofer, M. J. 1999. Introduction: Theory and concepts. In: M. F. Goodchild, M. Egenhofer, R. Fegeas, and C. Kottman (eds), Interoperating Geogrophic Information Systems. Norwell, Massachusetts: Kluwer. pp. 1-4.
9. ESRI White Paper. 2003. Spatial data standards and GIS interoperability. [http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/ spatial-data-standards.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
10. Fonseca, F. T., M. J. Egenhofer, P. Agouris, and G., Câmara. 2002. Using ontologies for integrated geographic information systems. Transactions in GIS 6 (3): 231-57.
11. Geowise White Paper. 2005. Applying the UK eGovernment Interoperability Framework (eGIF) to geographic information (GI) services. [http://www. geowise.co.uk/downloads/whitepapers/ GeoWise%20WP%20Applying%20eGIF%20to%20GI.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
12. Green, D. R. 1997. Cartography and the internet. The Cartographical Journal 34: 23-7.
13. Hong, I. 2004. Ontologies of landmarks for community wayfinding. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Aldephi, Maryland, USA, October 20-23. pp. 130-33.
14. Hwang, G. J., and S. S. Tseng. 1993. A heuristic task assignment algorithm to maximize reliability of a distributed system. Reliability, IEEE Transactions on 42 (3): 408-15.
15. Imamura, T., Y. Nakamura, S. Makino, and K. Tamura. 2004. Implementation and performance of ws-security. International Journal of Web Services Research 1(1): 58-72.
16. Intergraph White Paper. 2005. Intergraph Mapping and Geospatial Solutions' web services overview. [http://www.intergraph.com/ resource_files/literature/W1057/WP1057_screen.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
17. Jia, W., Y. Chen, J. Gong, and A., Li. 2004. Web service based web feature service. In: Proceedings of Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents, XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, Commission 4, July 12-23. [http://www.isprs.org/istanbul2004/comm4/papers/334.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
18. Kresse, W. 2004. Standardization of georaphic information. In: Proceedings of Geo-Imagery Bridging Continents, XXth ISPRS Congress, Istanbul, Turkey, Commission 2, July 12-23. [http://www.isprs.org/ istanbul2004/comm2/papers/132.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
19. Kottman, C. 1999. The Open GIS Consortium and progress toward interoperability in GIS. In: M.F. Goodchild, M. Egenhofer, R. Fegeas, and C. Kottman (eds), Interoperating Geographic Information Systems. Boston, Massachusetts: Kluwer. pp. 39-54.
20. MapInfo White Paper. 2003. Bringing GIS to the enterprise: Standards and interoperability. [http://www.mapinfo.co.uk/customer/download/ Interop_White_Paper_UK.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
21. Meier, J.D., A. Mackman, M. Dunner and S. Vasireddy. 2002. Web services security [http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/ en-us/dnnetsec/html/SecNetch10.asp; accessed September 4, 2005].
22. Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC). 1998. A request for technology in support of a web mapping technology testbed. The Open GIS Consortium Inc, US.
23. OGC Interoperability Program White Paper. 2001. [http://ip.opengis.org/ ows/010526_OWSWhitepaper.doc. Accessed September 4, 2005].
24. OGC document 02-070. 2002. Styled layer descriptor implementation specification. [shttp://www.opengeospatial.org/specs/?page= specs; accessed September 4, 2005].
25. OGC document 02-023r4.2003. OpenGIS Geography Markup Language (GML) implementation specification, version 3.00, [http://www.opengeospafial. org/specs/?page=specs; accessed September 4, 2005].
26. OGC document 03-002r8. 2003. Binary-XML encoding specification, version 0.0.8. [http://www.opengeospatial.org/docs/03-002r8.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
27. OGC document 03-065r6. 2003. Web Coverage Service (WCS), Version 1.0.0. [http://www.opengeospatial.org/specs/?page=specs; accessed September 4, 2005].
28. OGC document 04-024. 2004. Web Map Service, Version 1.3. [http://www. opengeospatial.org/specs/?page=specs; accessed September 4, 2005].
29. OGC document 04-021r2. 2004. OpenGIS catalogue service specification. [http://www.opengeospatial.org/specs/?page=specs; accessed September 4, 2005].
30. OGC document 04-094. 2005. Web feature service implementation specification, version 1.1.0. [http://www.opengeospatial.org/specs/ ?page=specs; accessed September 4, 2005].
31. Peng, Z. R., and M. S. Tsou. 2003. Internet GIS: Distributed geographic information services for the internet and wireless networks. New York, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
32. Peng, Z. R., and C. Zhang. 2004a. The roles of geography markup language, scalable vector graphics, and web feature service specifications in the development of internet geographic information systems. Journal of Geographical Systems 6(2): 95-116.
33. Peng, Z. R., and C. Zhang. 2004b. GML, WFS, SVG, and the future of internet GIS. GISδevelopment 8(7): 29-32.
34. Peng, Z. R., 2005. A proposed framework for feature-level geospatial data sharing: A case study for transportation network data. International Journal of Geographic Information Sciences 19(4): 459-81.
35. Plewe, B. 1997. GIS online: Information retrieval, mapping, and the Internet. Santa Fe, New Mexico: OnWord Press.
36. Probst, F., F. Gibotti, and A. Pazos. 2004. Connecting ISO and OGC models to the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Geographic Information Science, Aldephi, Maryland, USA, October 20-23. pp. 181-4.
37. Safe Software White Paper. 2005. Web-based data distribution systems. [http://www.safe.com/solutions/white-papers/ web-based-data-distribution.php. Accessed September 4, 2005].
38. Smith, B., and D. Mark. 2001. Geographic categories: An ontological investigation. International Journal of Geographic Information Science 15: 591-612.
39. Snowflake Software White Paper. 2005. Schema translation and semantics in data interoperability. [http://www.laser-scan.com/eurosdr/edelivery/ pdf/5_2d_Paper_Curtis.pdf; accessed September 4, 2005].
40. Su, Y., J. Slottow, and A. Mozes. 2000. Distributing proprietary geographic data on the World Wide Web - UCLA GIS Database and Map Server. Computers and Geosciences 26: 741-9.
41. Tarnoff, P. J. 1998. Evolution or control. Traffic Technology International (February/March): 32-5.
42. Tsou, M.H., and B.P. Buttenfield. 2002. A dynamic architecture for distributed geographic information services. Transactions in CIS 6(4): 335-81.
43. Zhang, C., W. Li, M. Day, and Z.-R. Peng. 2003. GML-based interoperable geographical database. Cartography 32(2): 1-16.
44. Zhu, X. 2001. Developing web-based mapping applications through distributed object technology. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 28: 249-58.
45. Wolter, R. 2004. Xml web services basics. [http://msdn.microsoft.com/ library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnwebsrv/html/webservbasics.asp; accessed September 4, 2005].
46. Worboys, M. E. 1995. GIS: A computing perspective. London, U.K.: Taylor & Francis.