Clinical experience with angulated, hand-activated, wireless instruments in an optical tracking system for endoscopic sinus surgery

Journal of Otolaryngology

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 317-322

  Fuoco, Gabriel ^a   Chiodo, Albino ^a   Smith, Oakley ^a   Masri, William El ^a   Guirgis, Ramy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complications; Computer assisted surgery; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Fiducial registration error; Image guided surgery; Stryker Navigation Optical Tracking System

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; ENDOSCOPIC SINUS SURGERY; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EXPERIENCE; EYE TRACKING; FEMALE; FIDUCIAL REGISTRATION ERROR; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE GUIDED SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARANASAL SINUSITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SYSTEMATIC ERROR; TREATMENT INDICATION; WIRELESS COMMUNICATION;

ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HOSPITALS, UNIVERSITY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; INFRARED RAYS; MALE; PARANASAL SINUSES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SURGICAL INSTRUMENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 31344452379     PISSN: 03816605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2310/7070.2005.34504     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Fried MP, Kleenfield J, Gopal H, et al. Image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery: results of accuracy and performance in a multicenter clinical study using an electromagnetic tracking system. Laryngoscope 1997;107:594-601.
2. Anon J. Computer aided endoscopic sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1998;108:949-61.
3. Metson R, Gliklich RE, Cosenza MJ. A comparison of image guidance systems for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 1998;108:1164-70.
4. Reittner P, Tillich M, Luxenberger W, et al. Multislice CT-image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery using an electromagnetic tracking system. Eur Radiol 2002;12:592-6.
5. Metson R, Cosenza MJ, Cunningham MD, et al. Physician experience with an optical image guidance system for sinus surgery. Laryngoscope 2000;110:972-6.
6. Fried MP, Morrison PR. Computer-augmented endoscopic sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1998;31:331-40.
7. Neumann AM, Pasquale-Niebles K, Bhuta T, et al. Am J Rhinol 1999;13:449-54.
8. Casiano RR, Numa WA. Efficacy of computer tomographic image-guided endoscopic sinus surgery in residency training program. Laryngoscope 2000;10:1277-82.
9. Gall RM, Witterick IJ, Hawke M. Image guided sinus surgery. J Otolaryngol 2004;33:22-5.
10. Loehrl TA, Toohill RJ, Smith TL. Use of computer-aided surgery for frontal sinus ventilation. Laryngoscope 2000;110:1962-7.
11. Citardi MJ. Computer-aided frontal sinus surgery. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2001;34:111-22.
12. West JB, Fitzpatrick JM, Toms SA, et al. Fiducial point placement and the accuracy of point based rigid body registration. Neurosurgery 2001;48:810-7.
13. Javer AR, Kuhn FA, Smith D. Stereotactic computer-assisted navigational sinus surgery: accuracy of an electromagnetic tracking system with the tissue debrider and when utilizing different headsets for the same patient. Am J Rhinol 2000;14:361-5.
14. Sharp HR, Crutchfield I, Rowe-Jones JM, et al. Major complications and consent prior to endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 2002;26:33-8.
15. May M, Levine HL, Mester SJ, et al. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 2108 patients: incidence and prevention. Laryngoscope 1994;104:1080-3.
16. Stankiewicz JA. Complications in endoscopic intranasal ethmoidectomy: an update. Laryngoscope 1989;99:686-90.
17. Cumberworth VL, Sudderick RM, MacKay IS. Major complications of functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Clin Otolaryngol 1994;19:248-53.
18. Vleming M, Middleweerd RJ, De Vries N. Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1992;118:617-23.
19. Kingdom TT, Orlandi RR. Image guided surgery of the sinuses: current technology and applications. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2004;34:381-400.