Dominance style, differences between the sexes and species: An agent-based model

Interaction Studies

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 131-146

  Hemelrijk, Charlotte K ^a   Gygax, Lorenz ^b  

^a University of Groningen Center of Biological Sciences Haren   (Netherlands)

^b SWISS FEDERAL VETERINARY OFFICE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Agent based model; Despotic; Dominance style; Egalitarian; Species

Indexed keywords

EID: 31344448058     PISSN: 15720373     EISSN: 15720381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1075/is.5.1.07hem     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bernstein, I. S. &Ehardt, C. L. (1985). Intragroup agonistic behavior in Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta). International Journal of Primatology 6, 209-226.
2. Chase, I.D. (1985). The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: an application of the jigsaw puzzle approach. Animal Behaviour 33, 86-100.
3. deWaal, F.B.M. (1984). Sex differences in the formation of coalitions among chimpanzees. Ethology and Sociobiology 5, 239-255.
4. deWaal, F.B.M. (1989). Dominance style and primate social organisation. In V. Standon &R. A. Foley (Eds.), Comparative socioecology (pp. 234-264). Oxford: Blackwell.
5. Dunbar, R. I.M. (1988). Primate social systems. London: Croom Helm.
6. Hemelrijk, C.K. (1999a). Effects of cohesiveness on intersexual dominance relationships and spatial structure among group-living virtual entities. In D. Floreano, Nicoud, J-D., Mondada, F. (Eds.), Advances in Artificial Life. Fifth European Conference on Artificial Life, 1674. (pp. 524-534). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
7. Hemelrijk, C. K. (1999b). An individual-oriented model on the emergence of despotic and egalitarian societies. Proceedings of the Royal Society London B: Biological Sciences 266, 361-369.
8. Hemelrijk, C. K. (2000). Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure. Animal Behaviour 59, 1035-1048.
9. Hemelrijk, C. K. (2002). Despotic societies, sexual attraction and the emergence of male tolerance: an agent-based model. Behaviour 139, 729-747.
10. Hemelrijk, C. K. in press The use of artificial-life models for the study of social organisations. In B. Thierry,M. Singh &W. Kaumanns (Eds.), How societies arise: the macaque model, Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Honk, C. v. &Hogeweg, P. (1981). The ontogeny of the social structure in a captive Bombus terrestris colony. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 9, 111-119.
12. Kappeler, P. (1991). Patterns of sexual dimorphism in body weight among Prosimian primates. Folia Primatologica 57, 132-146.
13. Kappeler, P.M. (1993). Female dominance in primates and other mammals. In P.P.G. Bateson, P.H. Klopfer &N.S. Thompson (Eds.), Perspectives in ethology, 10. (pp. 143-158). New York: Plenum Press.
14. Kummer, H. (1974). Rules of dyad and group formation among captive baboons (Theropithecus gelada). Symposium 5th Congress Intl. Primat. Soc.: S. Karger, Basel.
15. Mardia, K.V. (1972). Statistics of directional data. London: Academic Press.
16. Noe, R.,Waal, F.B.M. d. &Hooff, J. A. R. A.M.V. (1980). Types of dominance in a chimpan- zee colony. Folia Primatologica 34, 90-110.
17. Preuschoft, S., Paul, A. &Kuester, J. (1998). Dominance styles of female and male Barbary maceques (Macaca sylvanus). Behaviour 135, 731-755.
18. Thierry, B. (1985). Patterns of agonistic interactions in three species of macaque (Macaca mulatta, M. fascicularis, M. tonkeana). Aggressive Behavior 11, 223-233.
19. Thierry, B. (1990). Feedback loop between kinship and dominance: the macaque model. Journal of theoretical Biology 145, 511-521.
20. Thierry, B. (2000). Covariation of conflict management patterns acrossMacaque species. In F. Aureli &F.B.M. de Waal (Eds.), Natural conflict resolution Berkeley: University of California press.
21. Wright, S.P. (1992). Adjusted p-values for simultaneous inference. Biometrics 48, 1005-1013.