A methodology for an integrated risk assessment of spatially relevant hazards

Journal of Environmental Planning and Management

Volumn 49, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-19

  Greiving, Stefan ^a   Fleischhauer, Mark ^a   Lückenkötter, Johannes ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARD MANAGEMENT; NATURAL HAZARD; PLANNING METHOD; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 31344447753     PISSN: 09640568     EISSN: 13600559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09640560500372800     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Bachfischer, R. (1978) Die ökologische Risikoanalyse. In Dissertation TU München.
2. Batista, M. and Martins, L. and Costa, C. and Relvão, A. and Schmidt-Thomé, P. and Greiving, S. and Fleischhauer, M. and Peltonen, L. (2004) Preliminary results of a risk assessment study for uranium contamination in central Portugal. In Lisboa Paper presented at the International Workshop on Environmental Contamination from Uranium Production Facilities and Remediation Measures, ITN/DPRSN
3. Blaikie, P. and Cannon, T. and Davis, I. and Wisner, B.(1994) At Risk. Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability, and Disasters. London New York: Routledge.
4. (1998) Cooperating with Nature: Confronting Natural Hazards with Land-Use Planning for Sustainable Communities. Washington DC: Joseph Henry Press.
5. Cooke, R. (1991) Experts in Uncertainty: Opinion and Subjective Probability in Science. New York Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Cutter, S.(1993) Living with Risk. London: Edward Arnold.
7. Cutter, S. (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards Progress in Human Geography, 20, pp. 529-539.
8. Cutter, S. (2003) Richland County vulnerability assessment. Available at http://www.cas.sc.edu/geog/hrl/projects.html#Richland County Vulnerability.
9. Cutter, S. and Solecki, W. (1989) The national pattern of airborne toxic releases The Professional Geographer, 41, pp. 149-161.
10. Cutter, S. and Mitchell, J. and Scott, M. (1997) Handbook for conducting a GIS-based hazards assessment at the county level. Available at http://www.cas.sc.edu/geog/hrl/Handbook.pdf
11. Cutter, S. and Mitchell, J. and Scott, M. (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90, pp. 713-737.
12. Cutter, S. and Boruff, B. and Shirley, W. (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards Social Science Quarterly, 84, pp. 242 - 261.
13. Egli, T.(1996) Hochwasserschutz und Raumplanung: Schutz vor Naturgefahren mit Instrumenten der Raumplanung - Dargestellt am Beispiel von Hochwasser und Murgängen. Zürich: Vdf-Hochschulverlag an der ETH; ORL-Bericht 100.
14. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). (2005) HAZUS-MH-FEMA's software program for estimating potential losses from disasters. Available at http://www.fema.gov/hazus/hz_index.shtm
15. Fleischhauer, M. (2004) Klimawandel, Naturgefahren und Raumplanung: Ziel- und Indikatorenkonzept zur Operationalisierung räumlicher Risiken. Dortmund: Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur.
16. Greiving, S. (2002) Räumliche Planung und Risiko. München: Gerling Akademie Verlag.
17. Helmer, O. (1966) The Use of the Delphi Technique in Problems of Educational Innovations. Santa Monica: The Rand Corporation. Rand Documents No. P-3499
18. Hewitt, K. (1997) Regions of Risk. A Geographical Introduction to Disasters. Harlow: Addison Wesley Longman. Themes in Resource Management
19. Hewitt, K. and Burton, I.(1971) The Hazardousness of a Place: A Regional Ecology of Damaging Events. Toronto: University of Toronto, Department of Geography. Research Publication 6
20. Munich Re. (2003) Topics-Annual Review: Natural Catastrophes 2002. Munich: Munich Reinsurance Company.
21. SCEMD (South Carolina Emergency Management Division). (2002) State of South Carolina Hazards Assessment. Available at http://www.cas.sc.edu/geog/hrl/scemdmain.htm
22. (2005) ESPON Project 1.3.1-The spatial effects and management of natural and technological hazards in general and in relation to climate change. Espoo: Geological Survey of Finland. Forthcoming
23. Scholles, F.(1997) Abschätzen, Einschätzen und Bewerten in der UVP: Weiterentwicklung der ökologischen Risikoanalyse vor dem Hintergrund der neueren Rechtslage und des Einsatzes rechnergestützter Werkzeuge. Dortmund: Dortmunder Vertrieb für Bau- und Planungsliteratur. UVP-Spezial 13
24. Smith, K. (2001) Environmental Hazards: Assessing Risk and Reducing Disaster, 3rd edn. London and New York: Routledge.
25. Turoff, M. and Linstone, H.(1975) The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley.
26. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2004) Reducing Disaster Risk. A Challenge for Development. New York: UNDP.
27. Uitto, J. (1998) The geography of disaster vulnerability in megacities. A theoretical framework Applied Geography, 18, pp. 7-6.
28. Young, O. (2002) The Institutional Dimensions of Environmental Change: Fit, Interplay, and Scale. Cambridge, MA and London: MIT Press.