Online versus offline research: Implications for evaluating digital media

Aslib Proceedings

Volumn 54, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 229-239

  Gunter, Barrie ^a   Nicholas, David ^b   Huntington, Paul ^b   Williams, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Communications technology; Electronic mail; Internet; Online retrieval; Questionnaires; Surveys

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY; DIGITAL MEDIA; FACE-TO-FACE INTERVIEW; GENERAL POPULATION; OFFLINE; OFFLINE DATA; ONLINE RESEARCH; ONLINE RETRIEVAL; ONLINE SURVEYS; ONLINE TECHNOLOGY; OPEN-ENDED RESPONSE; OPERATIONAL PRACTICES; PUBLIC SERVICES; QUALITY OF DATA; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESPONSE RATE;

DATA ACQUISITION; DIGITAL STORAGE; ELECTRONIC MAIL; INTERNET; SURVEYS; TECHNOLOGY;

RESEARCH;

EID: 31244435553     PISSN: 0001253X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/00012530210443339     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Bachman, D., Elfrink, J. and Vazzana, G. (1996), "Tracking the progress of e-mail versus snail-mail", Marketing Research, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 31-5.
2. Bachman, D., Elfrink, J. and Vazzana, G. (1999), "E-mail and snail-mail face off in rematch", Marketing Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 10-15.
3. Brown, J., Culkin, N. and Fletcher, J. (2001), "Human factors in business-to-business research over the Internet", International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 425-40.
4. Carroll, S. (1994), "Questionnaire design affects response rate", Marketing News, Vol. 28 No. 1, p. 14.
5. Cobanoglu, C., Warde, B. and Moreo, P.J. (2001), "A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods", International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 441-52.
6. Coleman, S. (2000), "The new media and democratic politics", New Media & Society, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 67-74.
7. Comley, P. (1997), The Use of the Internet as a Data Collection Method, available at: www.sga.co.uk.esomar.html, pp. 1-7.
8. Couper, P., Blair, J. and Triplett, T. (1997), A Comparison of Mail and E-mail for a Survey of Employees in Federal Statistical Agencies, paper presented at the annual conference of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Norfolk, VA.
9. Curasi, C.F. (2001), "A critical exploration of face to face interviewing vs. computer-mediated interviewing", International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 43 No. 4, pp. 361-75.
10. de Leeuw, E.D. (1992), Data Quality in Mail, Telephone and face-to-face Surveys, TT Publications, Amsterdam.
11. Dillman, D.A. (1978), Mail and Telephone Surveys: The Total Design Method, Wiley-Interscience, New York, NY.
12. Dillman, D.A. (1991), "The design and administration of mail surveys", Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 225-49.
13. Dillman, D.A. (1999), Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed., John Wiley, New York, NY.
14. Dillman, D.A., Christenson, J.A., Carpenter, E.H. and Brooks, R. (1974), "Increasing mail questionnaire response: a four-state comparison", American Sociological Review, Vol. 39, pp. 744-56.
15. Dommeyer, C.J. and Moriarty, E. (2000), "Comparing two forms of an e-mail survey: embedded vs. attached", International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
16. Dutton, W.H. (Ed.) (1996), Information and Communication Technologies - Visions and Realities, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
17. Dutton, W.H. (1999), Society on the Line, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
18. Finnegan, J.E. and Allen, N.J. (1994), "Computerised and written questionnaires: are they equivalent?", Computers in Human Behaviour, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 484-96.
19. Frost, F. (1998), "Electronic surveys: new methods of primary data collection", in Anderson, P. (Ed.), Proceedings of the 27th EMAC Conference, Marketing Research, EMAC, Stockholm.
20. Goyder, J.C. (1985), "Face to face interviews and mail questionnaire: the net difference in response rate", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 49 No. 2, pp. 234-52.
21. Goyder, J.C. (1987), The Silent Majority: Nonrespondents on Sample Surveys, Westview Press, Boulder, CO.
22. Guba, E.G. and Lincoln, Y.S. (1989), Fourth Generation Evaluation, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
23. Gunter, B., Nicholas, D., Williams, P. and Huntington, P. (2001), "Is TV good for you?", The Library Association Record, Vol. 103 No. 9, pp. 557-8.
24. Havice, M.J. and Banks, M.J. (1992), "Live and automated telephone surveys: a comparison of human interviewers and an automated technique", Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 33 No. 2, pp. 91-102.
25. Heberlein, T.A. and Baumgartner, R. (1978), "Factors affecting response rates to mailed questionnaires: a quantitative analysis of the published literature", American Sociological Review, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 447-62, available at: www.usc.edu/dept/annenberg/vol3/issue1
26. James, D. (2000), "The future of online research", Marketing News, 3 January, pp. 164-70.
27. Kiesler, S. and Sproull, L. (1986), "Response effects in the electronic survey", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 402-13.
28. Lewis, F.L. (1987), "A decision support system for face-to-face groups", Journal of Information Science, Vol. 13 No. 2, pp. 211-19.
29. Martin, C.L. and Nagao, D.H. (1989), "Some effects of computerized interviewing on job applicant responses", Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 74 No. 1, pp. 72-80.
30. Mehta, R. and Sivadas, E. (1995), "Comparing response rates and response content in mail versus electronic mail surveys", Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 37, pp. 429-39.
31. Moon, Y. (1998), "Impression management in computer-based interviews: the effects of input modality, output modality and distance", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 610-22.
32. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Williams, P. (2001 a), "When titans clash: digital health information providers and the health service square up to each other", Managing Information, Vol. 8 No. 3, pp. 50-7.
33. Nicholas, D., Huntington, P. and Williams, P. (2001b), NHS Direct Online Interactive Enquiry Service Evaluation of the Pilot Stage, unpublished report submitted to NHS Direct Online operational team, City University, London.
34. Opperman, M. (1995), "E-mail surveys: potentials and pitfalls", Marketing Research, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 29-33.
35. Palmquist, J. and Stueve, A. (1996), "Stay plugged into new opportunities", Market Research, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 13-15.
36. Parker, L. (1992), "Collecting data the e-mail way", Training and Development, July, pp. 52-4.
37. Reeves, B. and Nass, C. (1996), The Media Equation, Cambridge University Press, New York, NY.
38. Rice, R. (1993), "Media appropriateness: using social presence theory to compare traditional and new organisational media", Human Communication Research, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 451-84.
39. Rosenfeld, P., Booth-Kewley, S. and Edwards, J.E. (1993), "Computer-administered surveys in organisational settings", American Behavioural Scientist, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 485-511.
40. Savage, M. (2001), "Online qual debate ensues", Research, December, Issue 427, p. 12.
41. Schaefer, D.R. and Dillman, D.A. (1998), "Development of a standard e-mail methodology: results of an experiment", Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 62 No. 3, pp. 378-97.
42. Smith, C.B. (1997), "Casting the net: surveying an Internet population", Journal of Communication Mediated by Coumputers, Vol. 3, pp. 1-12.
43. Soutar, G.N., Whiteley, A.M. and Callan, J.L. (1996), "Group support systems: an alternative to focus groups", Australian Journal of Market Research, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 35-46.
44. Sproull, L.S. (1986), "Using electronic mail for data collection in organisational research", Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 159-69.
45. Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N., Hausknecht, D.R., Dallin, R.F. and Johnson, L.W. (1997), "Collecting information from groups: a comparison of two methods", Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 397-411.
46. Sweeney, J.C., Soutar, G.N., Whiteley, A.M. and Johnson, L.W. (1996), "Generating consumption value items: a parallel interviewing process approach", Second South-East Asia-Pacific Association for Consumer Research Conference, 12-13 July, Perth.
47. Taylor, H. (2000), "Does Internet research work? Comparing online survey results with telephone survey", International Journal of Market Research, Vol. 42 No. 1, pp. 51-63.
48. Taylor, J., Bellamy, C., Raab, C., Dutton, W.H. and Peltu, M. (1996), "Innovation in public service delivery", in Dutton, W.H. (Ed.), Information and Communication Technologies: Visions and Realities, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 265-82.
49. Tse, A.C. (1998), "Comparing the response rate, response speed, and response quality of two methods of sending questionnaires: e-mail vs. mail", Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 40 No. 4, pp. 353-61.
50. Tse, A.C., Tse, K.C., Yin, C.H., Ting, C.B., Yi, T.W., Yee, K.P. and Hong, W.C. (1995), "Comparing two methods of sending out questionnaires: e-mail versus mail", Journal of the Market Research Society, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 441-6.
51. Tyebjee, T.T. (1979), "Telephone survey methods: the state of the art", Journal of Marketing, Vol. 43 No. 2, pp. 68-78.
52. US Department of Commerce (1999), Falling Through the Net: Defining the Digital Divide, National Telecommunications and Information Administration, 27 pp., available at: www.ntia.doc. gov/ntiahome/fttn99
53. Wallendorf, M. and Belk, R. (1989), Interpretive Consumer Research, Association for Consumer Research, Salt Lake City, UT.
54. Walther, J.B. (1992), "Interpersonal effects in computer-mediated interaction: a relational perspective", Communication Research, Vol. 19 No. 1, pp. 52-90.
55. Weible, R. and Wallace, J. (1998), "The impact of the Internet on data collection", Marketing Research, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 19-27.
56. White, E. (2000), "Market research on the Internet has its drawbacks", The Wall Street Journal, 2 March, B3.
57. Woolgar, S. (2000), "Virtual Society?", Profile 2000, Said Business School, University of Oxford, Oxford.