Efficiency of pair-wise treatment comparisons in incomplete block experiments subject to the lossof a block of observations

Communications in Statistics - Theory and Methods

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 449-462

  Prescott, P ^a   Mansson, R A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31244432139     PISSN: 03610926     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1081/STA-120002858     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Heydayat, A.; John, P.W.M. Resistant and Susceptible BIB Designs. The Annals of Statistics 1974, 2, 148-158.
2. Most, B.M. Resistance of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. The Annals of Statistics 1975, 3, 1149-1162.
3. John, P.W.M. Robustness of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs. The Annals of Statistics 1976, 4, 960-962.
4. Shah, S.M.; Gujarathi, C.C. On a Locally Resistant BIB Design of Degree 1. Sankhyã-The Indian Journal of Statistics Series B 1977, 39(4), 406-408.
5. Shah, S.M.; Gujarathi, C.C. Resistant BIB Design. Sankhyã-The Indian Journal of Statistics Series B 1983, 45(2), 225-232.
6. Constantine, G.M. Preservation of Optimality Under Loss of Varieties. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1985, 47(3), 438-446.
7. Dey, A.; Dhall, S.P. Robustness of Augmented BIB Designs. SankhyãThe Indian Journal of Statistics Series B 1988, 50(3), 376-381.
8. Singh, R.; Gupta, V.K.. Resistance of Block Designs. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1991, 27(2), 263-269.
9. Ghosh, S. Information in an Observation in Robust Designs. Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods 1982, 11, 1173-1184.
10. Ghosh, S. Robustness of BIBD Against the Unavailability of Data. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1982, 6, 29-32.
11. Ghosh, S.; Kageyama, S.; Mukerjee, R. Efficiency of Connected Binary Block Designs When a Single Observation is Unavailable. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 1992, 6, 593-603.
12. Whittinghill, D.C. Balanced Block Designs Robust Against the Loss of a Single Observation. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 1989, 22, 71-80.
13. Whittinghill, D.C. A Note on the Optimality of Block Designs Resulting from the Unavailability of Scattered Observations. Utilitas Mathematica 1995, 47, 21-31.
14. Srivastava, R.; Gupta, V.K.; Dey, A. Robustness of Some Designs Against Missing Observations. Communications in Statistics, Part A-Theory and Methods 1990, 19, 121-126.
15. Dey, A. Robustness of Block Designs Against Missing Data. Statistica Sinica 1993, 3, 219-231.
16. Prescott, P.; Mansson, R.A. Robustness of Balanced Incomplete Block Designs to Randomly Missing Observations. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2001, 92, 283-296.
17. Kageyama, S. Robustness of Some Balanced Block Designs. Discrete Mathematics 1993, 116, 159-181.
18. Bhaumik, D.K.; Whittinghill, D.C. Optimality and Robustness to the Unavailability of Blocks in Block Designs. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1991, 53, 399-407.
19. Gupta, V.K.; Srivastava, R. Investigations on Robustness of Block Designs Against Missing Observations. Sankhyã-The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series B 1992, 54, 100-105.
20. Das, A.; Kageyama, S. Robustness of BIB and Extended BIB Designs Against the Unavailability of Any Number of Observations in a Block. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis 1992, 14, 343-358.
21. Rhagavarao, D. Constructions and Combinatorial Problems in Design of Experiments. Wiley: New York, 1971.