Downstream economic benefits of conservation development

Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

Volumn 132, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 35-43

  Johnston, Douglas M ^a   Braden, John B ^a   Price, Thomas H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b Director of Water Resources Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

Damage; Drainage; Economic factors; Floods; Infrastructure; Runoff; Stormwater management; Urban areas

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRAINAGE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOOD DAMAGE; HYDROLOGY; PROBABILITY; RUNOFF; STORAGE (MATERIALS);

CONSERVATION DESIGN TECHNIQUES; CONSERVATION DEVELOPMENT; DRAINAGE INFRASTRUCTURE; ECONOMIC FACTORS; FLOOD RISK REDUCTION; STORWATER MANAGEMENT;

WATER CONSERVATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRAINAGE; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FLOOD CONTROL; FLOOD DAMAGE; HYDROLOGY; PROBABILITY; RUNOFF; STORAGE (MATERIALS); WATER CONSERVATION;

CONSERVATION; ECONOMIC IMPACT; FLOODING; STORMWATER; URBAN DRAINAGE; WATER MANAGEMENT;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 31144476695     PISSN: 07339496     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2006)132:1(35)     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Arendt, R. G. (1994). Conservation design for subdivisions, Island, Washington, D.C.
2. Blackberry Creek Watershed Committee. (1999). Blackberry Creek Watershed Management Plan; Kane and Kendall Counties, Ill.
3. Braden, J. B., and Johnston, D. M. (2003). "The downstream economic benefits of storm water retention." J. Water Resour. Plan. Manage.JWRMD50733-949610.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2004)130:6(498), 130(6), 498-505.
4. Conservation Design Forum (CDF). (2003). "Blackberry Creek alternative futures analysis." Proc., Conservation Design Forum, Elmhurst, Ill.
5. Davis, S. A., Carlson, B. D., and Moser, D. A. (2003). Depth-damage functions for corps of engineers flood damage reduction studies, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Ft. Belvoir, Va.
6. Federal Highway Administration. (1985). "Hydraulic design of highway culverts," Hydraulic Design Series No. 5, Rep. No. FHWA-IP-85-15, Washington, D.C.
7. Haan, C. T., Barfield, B. J., and Hayes, J. C. (1994). Design hydrology and sedimentology for small catchments, Academic, San Diego.
8. Kane County. (1996). 2020 land resource management plan, Kane County, Ill.
9. Streiner, C. F., and Loomis, J. B. (1995). "Estimating the benefits of urban stream restoration using the hedonic price method." RiverZZZZZZ1098-5956, 5(4), 267-278.
10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1994). "The Great Flood of 1993 post-flood report: Upper Mississippi River and Lower Missouri River Basins." Rep., North Central Division, St. Paul, Minn.
11. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (1996). "Engineering and design: Risk-based analysis for flood damage reduction studies." Manual No. 1110-2-1619, Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
12. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). (2000). "Planning guidance notebook." Engineering Regulation 1105-2-100, Department of the Army, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, D.C.
13. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). (2001). Hydrologic Simulation Program-Fortran, Version 12, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Athens, Ga.
14. U.S. Water Resources Council (USWRC). (1983). "Economic and environmental principles for water and related land resources implementation studies."
15. Wilson, A., Seal, J. L., McManigal, L. A., Lovins, L. H., Cureton, M., and Browning, W. D. (1998). Green development: Integrating ecology and real estate, Wiley, New York.