The practice turn in nursing epistemology

Nursing Science Quarterly

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 36-38

  Reed, Pamela G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

Author keywords

Epistemology; Nursing practice; Nursing theory

Indexed keywords

CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMAN; KNOWLEDGE; MODEL; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING CARE; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; ORGANIZATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PHILOSOPHY; PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE; REVIEW; SCIENCE;

CONCEPT FORMATION; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MODELS, NURSING; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING CARE; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING THEORY; ORGANIZATIONAL INNOVATION; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING; POSTMODERNISM; PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY; SCIENCE;

EID: 31144473617     PISSN: 08943184     EISSN: 15527409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894318405283545     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
2. Alcoff, L. M. (1995). The problem of speaking for others. In J. Roof & R. Wiegman (Eds.), Who can speak? Authority and critical identity (pp. 97-119). Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
3. Baird, D. (2004). Thing knowledge: A philosophy of scientific instruments. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
4. Connor, M. J. (2004). The practical discourse in philosophy and nursing: An exploration of linkages and shifts in the evolution of praxis. Nursing Philosophy, 5, 54-66.
5. Diers, D. (1995). Clinical scholarship. Journal of Professional Nursing, 11(1), 24-30.
6. Doane, G. H., & Varcoe, C. (2005). Toward compassionate action: Pragmatism and the inseparability of theory/practice. Advances in Nursing Science, 28(1), 81-90.
7. Ellis, R. (1969). The practitioner as theorist. American Journal of Nursing, 68, 1434-1438.
8. Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Hess, D. J. (1997). Science studies: An advanced introduction. New York: New York University Press.
10. Lamb, D., & Easton, S. M. (1984). Multiple discovery: The pattern of scientific progress. Trowbridge, UK: Avebury.
11. Larsen, K., Adamsen, L., Bjerregaard, L., & Madsen, J. K. (2002). There is no gap 'per se' between theory and practice: Research knowledge and clinical knowledge are developed in different contexts and follow their own logic. Nursing Outlook, 50, 204-212.
12. Peplau, H. (1952). Interpersonal relations in nursing. New York: Putnam.
13. Peplau, H. (1992). Interpersonal relations: A theoretical framework for application in nursing practice. Nursing Science Quarterly, 5, 13-18.
14. Paterson, J., & Zderad, L. (1976). Humanistic nursing. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
15. Pickering, A. (1995). The mangle of practice: Time, agency, and science. Chicago: University of Chicago.
16. Pickstone, J. V. (2000). Ways of knowing: A new history of science, technology and medicine. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press.
17. Reed, P. G. (1996). Transforming practice knowledge into nursing knowledge - A revisionist analysis of Peplau. Image: Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 28(1), 27-31.
18. Rolfe, G. (1996). Closing the theory-practice gap: A new paradigm for nursing. Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
19. Rolfe, G. (2000). Nursing praxis and the reflexive practitioner: Collected papers 1993-1999. London: NPI.
20. Rouse, J. (2002). How scientific practices matter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
21. Roy, C., & Obloy, M. (1978). The practitioner movement - toward a science of nursing. American Journal of Nursing, 10, 1698-1702.
22. Shusterman, R. (1997). Practicing philosophy: Pragmatism and the philosophical life. New York: Routledge.