Action research in the context of a school–university partnership: Its value, problems, issues and benefits

Educational Action Research

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 225-242

  Catelli, Linda A ^a   Costello, John ^b   Padovano, Kathryn ^a  

^a DOWLING COLLEGE   (United States)

^b HUMBOLDT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144472284     PISSN: 09650792     EISSN: 17475074     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09650790000200119     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Boyer, E., 1991. Scholarship Reconsidered: priorities of the professorate, Princeton: Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.
2. Catelli, L. A., 1990. “ School–University Partnerships: the transference of a model ”. In Festschrift–Leadership in Library Education: essays in honor of Jane Anne Hannigan, Edited by: Intner, S. S., and Vandergrift, K. E., Metuchen: Scarecrow Press.
3. Catelli, L. A., 1992. Against All Odds: a holistic urban school–college partnership: Project SCOPE. Action in Teacher Education, 14 (1): 42–51.
4. Catelli, L. A., 1995. Action Research and Collaborative Inquiry in a School–University Partnership. Action in Teacher Education, 16 (4): 25–38.
5. Catelli, L. A., 1997. “ An Holistic Perspective on School–University Partnerships in the 21st Century ”. In Exploring Futures in Teacher Education: changing key for changing times, Edited by: Hudson, A., and Lambert, D., London: Institute of Education University of London.
6. Catelli, L. A., Padovano, K., Costello, J., and Diver-Stamnes, A., 1999. Strategic Models of School–College Partnerships to Effect Change and Improvement in Student Learning and Teacher Education: a Comparison of Two Approaches. January 41999. An unpublished paper presented at a Symposium at the Twelfth Annual Conference of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement in San Antonio, Texas
7. Clark, R. W., 1988. “ School–University Relationships: an interpretive review ”. In School–University Partnerships in Action: concepts, cases, and concerns, Edited by: Sirotnik, K., and Goodlad, J., New York: Teachers College Press.
8. Clift, R., Veal, M. L., Johnson, M., and Holland, P., 1990. Restructuring Teacher Education through Collaborative Action Research. Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (2): 52–62.
9. Cochran-Smith, M., and Lytle, S. L., 1993. Inside! Outside!: teacher research and knowledge, New York: Teachers College Press.
10. Eaton, J., 1999. “ Accreditation and Quality Assurance: ambivalence and confusion ”. In Architecture for Change: information as foundations, presentations from the 1998 AAHE Assessment Conference, Edited by: AAHE Staff. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education (AAHE).
11. Edison Project. 1994. An Invitation to Public School Partnership, New York: Edison Project.
12. Edison Project. 1997. Annual Report on School Performance, New York: Edison Project.
13. Finnan, C., St John, E., McCarthy, J., and Slovacek, S., 1996. Accelerated Schools in Action, Thousand Oaks: Corwin Press.
14. Gips, C., and Stoel, C., eds. 1999. Making a Place in the Faculty Rewards System for Work with K-12: a project report of four universities, Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education.
15. Goodlad, J., 1988. “ School–University Partnerships for Educational Renewal: rationale and concepts ”. In School–University Partnerships in Action: concepts, cases, and concerns, Edited by: Sirotnik, K., and Goodlad, J., New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Goodlad, J., 1990. Teachers for Our Nation's Schools, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
17. Goodlad, J., 1994. Educational Renewal: better teachers, better schools, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
18. Halsall, R., ed. 1998. Teacher Research and School Improvement, Philadelphia: Open University Press.
19. Hollingsworth, S., ed. 1997. International Action Research: a casebook for educational reform, London: Falmer Press.
20. Holly, P., 1991. “ Action Research: the missing link in the creation of schools as centers of inquiry ”. In Staff Development for Education in the 90's, Edited by: Lieberman, A., and Miller, L., New York: Teachers College Press.
21. Holmes Group. 1986. Tomorrow's Teachers: a report of the Holmes Group, East Lansing: Holmes Group.
22. Holmes Group. 1990. Tomorrow's Schools: a report of the Holmes Group, East Lansing: Holmes Group.
23. Holmes Group. 1995. Tomorrow’s Schools of Education: a report of the Holmes Group, East Lansing: Holmes Group.
24. Hovda, R. A., and Kyle, D. W., 1984. Action Research: a professional development possibility. Middle School Journal, 15 (13): 21–23.
25. Hovda, R. A., and Kyle, D. W., 1987. The Potential and Practice of Action Research, Part 1 [special issue]. Peabody Journal of Education, 64 (1)
26. Krahenbuhl, G., 1998. Faculty work: integrating responsibilities and institutional needs. Change, 30 (6): 18–25.
27. Levine, A., 1997. “ The State of American Higher Education ”. In Teachers College Columbia University 1997 Annual Report, New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
28. Lieberman, A., 1986. Collaborative Research: working with, not working on. Educational Leadership, 43 (45): 28–32.
29. MacGregor, J., 1999. “ Assessment of Powerful Pedagogies: classroom, campus, and beyond ”. In Architecture for Change: information as foundations, presentations from the 1998 AAHE Assessment Conference, Edited by: AAHE Staff. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education (AAHE).
30. McKenna, B., December 1998/January 1999. Clinical Connections: finding what works in teacher education. AFT On Campus, 18 (4): 6–7.
31. National Commission on Excellence in Education. 1983. Nation at Risk, Washington DC: National Commission on Excellence on Education.
32. Noffke, S., and Stevenson, R., 1995. Educational Action Research: becoming practically critical, New York: Teachers College Press.
33. Rohan, S., 1999. “ The Malcolm Baldridge Approach and Assessment ”. In Architecture for Change: information as foundations, presentations from the 1998 AAHE Assessment Conference, Edited by: AAHE Staff. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education (AAHE).
34. Ruch, R., 1999. For Profit: application of the corporate model to academic enterprise. American Association for Higher Education Bulletin, 51 (6): 3–6.
35. Schlechty, P., and Whitford, B., 1988. “ Shared problems and shared vision: organic collaboration ”. In School–University Partnerships in Action: concepts, cases, and concerns, Edited by: Sirotnik, K., and Goodlad, J., New York: Teachers College Press.
36. Sirotnik, K., 1988. “ The Meaning and Conduct of Inquiry in School–University Partnerships ”. In School–University Partnerships in Action: concepts, cases, and concerns, Edited by: Sirotnik, K., and Goodlad, J., New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Sirotnik, K., and Goodlad, J., eds. 1988. School–University Partnerships in Action: concepts, cases, and concerns, New York: Teachers College Press.
38. Sizer, T., 1996. Horace's Hope, Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Wergin, J., 1999. “ Assessment of programs and units ”. In Architecture for Change: information as foundations, presentations from the 1998 AAHE Assessment Conference, Edited by: AAHE Staff. Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education (AAHE).
40. Wilbur, P., and Lambert, L., 1995. Linking America's Schools and Colleges, Washington DC: American Association for Higher Education. 2nd edn
41. Winston, G., 1999. For Profit Higher Education: Godzilla or chicken little?. Change, 31 (1): 13–19.