Post-colonial Antarctica: An emerging engagement

Polar Record

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 59-70

  Dodds, Klaus J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GEOPOLITICS; POST-COLONIALISM; THEORETICAL STUDY;

ANTARCTICA;

EID: 31144471383     PISSN: 00322474     EISSN: 14753057     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0032247405004857     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. Ahluwalia, K. 1960-61. The Antarctic Treaty: Should India become a party to it? Indian Journal of International Law 1: 473-483.
2. Barber, L., and M. Selby. 1983. The search for an alternative strategy: New Zealand and the Antarctic. The Round Table 288: 466-472.
3. Beck, P. 1985. The United Nations' study of Antarctica. Polar Record 22 (140): 499-509.
4. Beck, P. 1986. International politics of Antarctica. New York: St Martin's Press.
5. Beck, P. 2004. Twenty years on: The UN and the 'Question of Antarctica'. Polar Record 40 (214): 205-212.
6. Belich, J. 2001. Paradise re-forged. Auckland: Penguin.
7. Bertrand, K. 1971. Americans in Antarctica 1775-1948. New York: American Geographical Society.
8. Blunt, A., and J. Willis. 2000. Dissident geographies. Harlow: Prentice-Hall.
9. Butler, L. 2002. Britain and empire. London: I.B. Tauris.
10. Carter, P. 1987. On the road to Botany Bay. London: Faber and Faber.
11. Chaturvedi, S. 1986. India and the Antarctic Treaty System: Realities and prospects. India Quarterly 32: 1-38.
12. Chaturvedi, S. 1996. The polar regions: A political geography. Chichester: John Wiley.
13. Collis, C. 1999. Mawson's hut: Emptying post-colonial Antarctica. Journal of Australian Studies 63: 22-29.
14. Collis, C., and Q. Stevens. 2003. Living in the cold light of reason: colonial settlements in Antarctica. In: Gusheh, M., and N. Stead (editors). The proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand Sydney: Society of Architectural Historians: 291-297.
15. Darwin, J. 1988. Britain and decolonization. London: Macmillan.
16. Dey, A. 1991. India in Antarctica: Perspectives, programmes and achievements. Polar Record 27 (161): 87-92.
17. Dodds, K. 1993. Geography, identity and the creation of the Argentine state. Bulletin of Latin American Research 12: 311-331.
18. Dodds, K. 1997. Geopolitics in Antarctica. Chichester: John Wiley.
19. Dodds, K. 2002. Pink ice: Britain and the South Atlantic empire. London: I.B. Tauris.
20. Dodds, K., and K. Yusoff. 2005. Settlement and unsettlement in Aotearoa/ New Zealand and Antarctica. Polar Record 41 (217): 141-155.
21. Driver, F. 2001. Geography militant. Oxford: Blackwell.
22. Edney, M. 1997. Mapping an empire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
23. Elliott, L. 1994. International environmental politics: Protecting the Antarctic. New York: St Martin's Press.
24. Escobar, A. 1995. Encountering development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
25. Escude, C. 1988. Argentine territorial nationalism. Journal of Latin American Studies 20: 139-165.
26. Escude, C. 1992. Education, political culture and foreign policy: The case of Argentina. Durham: Duke-UNC Working Paper Series.
27. Foreign and Commonwealth Office. 1999. Partnership for progress. London: Foreign and Commonwealth Office.
28. Furedi, F. 1994. The new ideology of imperialism. London: Verso.
29. Glasberg, E. 2000. On the road with Chrysler: From nation to virtual empire. In: King, R. (editor). Post colonial America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press: 154-170.
30. Gregory, D. 2004. The colonial present. Oxford: Blackwell.
31. Hains, B. 2002. The ice and inland: Mawson, Flynn and the myth of the frontier. Melbourne: Melbourne University Press.
32. Haron, M. 1991. The ability of the Antarctic Treaty System to adapt to external challenges. In: Jorgensen-Dahl, A., and W. Ostreng (editors). Antarctic Treaty System in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 299-308.
33. Harper, T. 1999. The end of empire and the making of Malaya. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Hemmings, A. 1990. Is Antarctica demilitarised? In: Herr, R., R. Hall, and M. Haward (editors). Antarctica's future: Continuity or change? Hobart: Australian Institute of International Affairs: 225-241.
35. Hemmings, A., and M. Rogan-Finemore (editors). 2005. Antarctic bio-prospecting. Christchurch: Gateway Antarctica (Special Publication Series 51).
36. Herr, R., and R. Hall. 1989. Science as currency and currency as science. In: Handmer, J. (edPtor). Antarctica: policies and policy development. Canberra: CRES: 13-24.
37. Herr, R., and B. Davis (editors). 1994. Asia and Antarctica. Canberra: CRES.
38. Jabour-Green, J., and D. Nicol. 2003. Bio-prospecting in areas outside national jurisdiction: Antarctica and the Southern Ocean. Melbourne Journal of International Law 4: 76-111.
39. Johnson, C. 2004. The sorrows of empire. New York: Metropolitan Books.
40. Jones, M. 2002. Conflict and confrontation in South East Asia 1961-1965. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Jones, M. 2004. The last great quest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
42. Joyner, C. 2002. Governing the frozen commons. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
43. Joyner, C., and E. Theis. 1997. Eagle over the ice. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.
44. Kaplan, A. 1993. Left alone with America: The absence of empire in the study of American culture. In: Kaplan, A., and D. Pearse (editors). Cultures of United States imperialism. Durham: Duke University Press: 3-21.
45. Kaplan, A. and D. Pearse (editors). 1993. Cultures of United States imperialism. Durham: Duke University Press.
46. Kearns, G. 1993. Fin-de-siecle geopolitics. In: Taylor, P. (editor). Political geography in the twentieth century. London: Belhaven Press: 9-30.
47. King, R. 2000. Introduction. In: King, R. (editor). Post colonial America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press: 1-20.
48. Klotz, F. 1990. America on the ice. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.
49. Lambert, D. 2005. As solid as a rock? Place, belonging and the local appropriation of imperial discourse in Gibraltar. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 30: 206-220.
50. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
51. Leane, E. 2003. Antarctica as a scientific utopia. Foundation: International Review of Science Fiction 32: 27-35.
52. Lester, A. 2001. Imperial networks. London: Routledge.
53. Livingstone, D. 2003. Putting science in its place. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Loomba, A. 1998. Colonialism/Postcolonialism. London: Routledge.
55. Massey, D. 1995. Places and their pasts. History Workshop Journal 38: 182-192.
56. McCannon, J. 1994. Red ice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
57. Morin, K. 2002. Mining empire. In: Blunt, A., and C. McEwan (editors). Post-colonial geographies. London: Continium: 152-168.
58. Paisley, F. 2003. Introduction: White settler colonialisms and the colonial turn: An Australian perspective. Journal of Colonialism and Colonial History 4: 1-7 (on line publication). http://muse.jhu.edu/ journals/journal_of_colonialism_and_colonial_history/v003/3
59. Park, Y., and H. Schwarz. 2005. Extending American hegemony: Beyond empire. Interventions 7: 153-161.
60. Pease, D. 2000. US imperialism: Global dominance without colonies. In: Schwarz, H., and S. Ray (editors). A companion to postcolonial studies. London: Routledge: 203-220.
61. Power, M. 2003. Rethinking development geographies. London: Routledge.
62. Pyne, S. 2003. The ice. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.
63. Rajan, H. 1986. India's approach to the Antarctic Treaty System as a new consultative party. In: Wolfrum, R. (editor). Antarctic challenge II. Berlin: Duncker and Humboldt: 305-319.
64. Robinson, J. 2003. Post-colonizing geography: Tactics and pitfalls. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography 24: 273-289.
65. Rothwell, D. 1996. Polar regions and the development of international law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
66. Said, E. 1978. Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
67. Said, E. 2001. Out of place. London: Verso.
68. Scott, S. 2004. The political interpretation of multilateral treaties. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff.
69. Seed, P. 1993. Ceremonies of possession. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Sharpe, J. 1995. Is the United States postcolonial? Diaspora 4: 181-200.
71. Sidaway, J. 2000. Postcolonial geographies: An exploratory essay. Progress in Human Geography 24: 573-594.
72. Simon, D. 1998. Rethinking post-modernism, post-colonialism and post-traditionalism: South-north perspectives. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 16: 219-245.
73. Simon, D., and K. Dodds. 1998. Introduction: Rethinking geographies of north-south development. Third World Quarterly 19: 595-606.
74. Slater, D. 1999. Locating the American century: Themes for a post-colonial perspective. In: Slater, D., and P. Taylor (editors). The American century. Oxford: Blackwell: 17-31.
75. Stokke, O., and D. Vidas (editors). 1996. Governing the Antarctic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76. Stratton, J. 2000. The beast of apocalypse. In: King, R. (editor). Post-colonial America. Urbana: University of Illinois Press: 21-64.
77. Suter, K. 1994. The future of the Antarctic regime. In: Herr, R., and B. Cavis (editors). Asia in Antarctica. Canberra: CRES: 159-168.
78. Tepper, R., and M. Haward. 2005. The development of Malaysia's position on Antarctica: 1982 to 2004. Polar Record 41 (217): 113-124.
79. UNCLOS. 1982. United Nations Law of the Convention on the Sea. www.un.org
80. United Nations General Assembly. 1984. United Nations Resolution 40/ 156A. 17 December 1984.
81. Young, R. 2003. Post-colonialism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
82. Yusoff, J. 2002. Malaysia's foreign policy towards Antarctica. Working paper presented to the 'Malaysian International Seminar on Antarctica: Opportunities for Research,' University Malaya, 5-6 August 2002.