Influence of xylan on the degradability of laboratory kraft pulps from hardwood and reed canary grass in acid hydrolysis

Cellulose

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 621-628

  Håkansson, Helena ^a   Germgård, Ulf ^a   Sens, Denis ^b  

^a KARLSTAD UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Tembec R and D Tartas   (France)

Author keywords

Acid hydrolysis; Birch; Cellulose; Eucalyptus; Fiberlength; Intrinsic viscosity; Kraft; Levelling off degree of polymerisation; Prehydrolysis; Reed canary grass; Xylan

Indexed keywords

BLEACHED PULP; CELLULOSE; COMPOSITION EFFECTS; DECAY (ORGANIC); DEGRADATION; DEPOLYMERIZATION; DISSOLUTION; EXTRACTION; HARDWOODS; HYDROLYSIS; PLANTS (BOTANY); POLYSACCHARIDES;

FIBER FRAGMENTS; LABORATORY-PREPARED KRAFT PULPS; LEVELLING-OFF DEGREE OF POLYMERISATION; REED CANARY GRASS;

KRAFT PULP;

ACIDOLYSIS; BETULA; CELLULOSE FIBERS; DEGRADABILITY; DEPOLARIZATION; DISSOLVING; EUCALYPTUS; FIBER LENGTH; FIBRILS; GRASSES; INTRINSIC VISCOSITY; KRAFT PULPING; KRAFT PULPS; PREHYDROLYSIS; XYLANS;

CELLULOSE;

EID: 31144461272     PISSN: 09690239     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10570-005-9011-6     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Battista O.A. 1950. Hydrolysis and crystallization of cellulose. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 42:502-507. 10.1021/ie50483a029
2. Battista O.A., Coppick S., et al. 1956. Level-Off Degree of Polymerization - relation to polyphase structure of cellulose fibres. Industrial and Engineering Chemistry 48:333-335. 10.1021/ie50554a046
3. Berggren H. 1989. Project agro-fibre: Lucerne and reed canary grass in the pulp of the future. Svensk Papperstidn. 92(17):28-30 33.
4. Croon I. and Timell T.E. 1960. Distribution of Substituents in Partially Methylated Xylan. Journal of American Chemical Scociety 82:3416-3418. 10.1021/ja01498a044
5. Duchesne I., Hult E.-L. et al. 2001. The Influence of Hemicellulose on Fibril Aggregation of Kraft Pulp Fibres as Revealed by FE-SEMand CP/MAS 13C-NMR. Cellulose 8(2):103-111. 10.1023/A:1016645809958
6. R. Evans A.F.A. Wallis 1987. Comparison of Cellulose Molecular Weights Determined By High Performance Size Exclusion Chromatography and Viscometry. Fourth Int. Symp. Wood Chemistry, Paris, France.
7. Feng Z. and Alén R. 2001. Soda-AQ pulping of Reed Canary Grass. Industrial Crops and Products 14:31-39. 10.1016/S0926-6690(00)00086-8
8. Finell M. 2003. The Use of Reed Canary-Grass (Phalaris arundinacea) as a Short Fibre Raw Material for the Pulp and Paper Industry. Umeå, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 2003, Sweden.
9. A. Frey-Wyssling K. Muhlethaler 1965. Ultrastructural Plant Cytology With An Introduction to Molecular Biology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
10. Hausalo T. 1995. Analysis of Wood and Pulp Carbohydrates By Anion Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection. 8th International Symposium on Wood and Pulping Chemistry, Helsinki, Finland.
11. Hearle J.W.S. 1963. The fine structure of fibres and crystalline polymers. Journal of Applied Polymer Science 7:1175-1192. 10.1002/ app.1963.070070401
12. Hess K., Mahl H., et al. 1957. Koloid-Z. 155:1-19. 10.1007/BF01501290
13. Hult E.-L., Larsson P.T., et al. 2000. A comparative CP/MAS 13C-NMR study of cellulose structure in spruce wood and kraft pulp. Cellulose 7:35-55. 10.1023/A:1009236932134
14. H. Håkansson 1995. Ethanol Pulping of Reed Canary Grass. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden.
15. Håkansson H. and Ahlgren P. 2005. Dilute acid hydrolysis of some industrial pulps: Effect of hydrolysis conditions and raw material. Cellulose 12:177-183. 10.1007/s10570-004-1038-6
16. Håkansson H., and Ahlgren P., et al. 2005. The degree of disorder in hardwood kraft pulps studied by means of LODP. Cellulose 12: 327-335.
17. Kratky O. and Mark H. 1937. Z. Phys Chemie B36:129-139.
18. H. Krässig 1993. Cellulose. Structure, Accessibility and Reactivity. Gordon and Breach Science Publishers. Yverdon, Switzerland.
19. Krässig H.A. 1976. Structure Investigations on Cellulose Fibers Using Infrared Spectroscopy and X-Ray Diffraction. Applied Polymer Symposium 28:777-790.
20. Nishiyama Y., Kim U.-J. et al. 2003. Periodic Disorder along Ramie Cellulose Microfibrils. Biomacromolecules 4:1013-1017. 10.1021/bm025772x
21. Page D.H. 1983. The Origin of the Differences Between Sulphite and Kraft pulps. Pulp Pap. Can 84(3):15-20.
22. Phillipp H.J., Nelson M.L., et al. 1947. Crystallinity of cellulose fibers as determined by acid hydrolysis. Textile Research Journal 18:585-596.
23. Ro̊nby B.G. 1952. The cellulose micells. Tappi 35(2):53-58.
24. Scallan A.M. 1971. A quantitative picture of the fringed micellar model of cellulose. Textile Research Journal 41:647-653.
25. Teleman O., Larsson P.T., et al. 2001. On the Accessibility and Structure of Xylan in Birch Kraft Pulp. Cellulose 8(3):209-215. 10.1023/ A:1013195030404
26. Wisur H., Sjöberg L.-A. et al. 1993. Selecting a Potential Swedish Fibre Crop: Fibers and fines in different crops as an indication of their usefulness in pulp and paper production. Industrial Crops and Products (2):39-45. 10.1016/0926-6690(93)90009-X