Palm glucose readings compared with fingertip readings under steady and dynamic glycemic conditions, using the OneTouch® Ultra® Blood Glucose Monitoring System

Diabetes Technology and Therapeutics

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 916-926

  Kempe, Kirsten C ^a   Budd, David ^a   Stern, Marc ^a   Ellison, John M ^a   Saari, Linda A ^a   Adiletto, Carol A ^b   Olin, Bryan ^c   Price, David A ^a   Horwitz, David L ^a  

^a LifeScan Inc   (United States)

^b Inverness Medical Innovations   (United States)

^c Endovascular Division   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DYNAMICS; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FINGER; FOOD INTAKE; HAND PALM; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; HYPERGLYCEMIA; HYPOGLYCEMIA; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REFERENCE VALUE; STEADY STATE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; CHILD; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 1; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; FEMALE; HAND; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 31144456462     PISSN: 15209156     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/dia.2005.7.916     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Blake DR, Nathan DM: Point-of-care testing for diabetes. Crit Care Nurs Q 2004;27:150-161.
2. Winter WE: A Rosetta stone for insulin treatment: self-monitoring of blood glucose. Clin Chem 2004;50: 985-989.
3. Seley J: Giving the fingers a rest: alternative site testing eases blood glucose monitoring. Am J Nurs 2003;103:73, 75, 77.
4. Jones PM, Remley C, Engberg RA: Development and testing of the barriers to self-monitoring blood glucose scale. Diabetes Educ 1996;22:606-616.
5. Dorchy H, Roggemans MP: Improvement of the compliance with blood glucose monitoring in young insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients by the Sensorlink system. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1997; 36:77-82.
6. Polonsky WH, Boswell SL, Edelman SV: Physician attributions concerning regimen adherence in diabetes. Poster presented at the 56th American Diabetes Association Meeting, June, 1996, Atlanta, GA.
7. Jungheim K, Koschinsky T: Risky delay of hypoglycemia detection by glucose monitoring at the arm. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1303-1304.
8. Feldman B, McGarraugh G, Heller A, Bohannon N, Skyler J, DeLeeuw, Clarke D: FreeStyle: a small-volume electrochemical glucose sensor for home blood glucose testing. Diabetes Technol Ther 2000;2:221-229.
9. Fineberg SE, Bergenstal RM, Bernstein RM, Laffel LM, Schwartz SL: Use of an automated device for alternative site blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1217-1220.
10. Bina DM, Anderson RL, Johnson ML, Bergenstal RM, Kendall DM: Clinical impact of prandial state, exercise, and site preparation on the equivalence of alternative-site blood glucose testing. Diabetes Care 2003;26:981-985.
11. Cunningham DD, Henning TP, Shain EB, Young DF, Hannig J, Barua E, Lee RC: Vacuum-assisted lancing of the forearm: an effective and less painful approach to blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2000;2:541-548.
12. Jungheim K, Koschinsky T: Glucose monitoring at the arm: risky delays of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia detection. Diabetes Care 2002;25:956-960.
13. Jungheim K, Koschinsky T: Glucose monitoring at the thenar: evaluation of upper dermal blood glucose kinetics during rapid systemic blood glucose changes. Horm Metab Res 2002;34:325-329.
14. Peled N, Wong D, Gwalani SL: Comparison of glucose levels in capillary blood samples obtained from a variety of body sites. Diabetes Technol Ther 2002;4:35-44.
15. Pfützner A, Forst T: Response to Jungheim and Koschinsky. Diabetes Care 2002;25:638-639.
16. Lee DM, Weinert SE, Miller EE: A study of forearm versus finger stick glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol Ther 2002;4:13-23.
17. Lock JP, Szuts EZ, Malomo KJ, Anagnostopoulos A: Whole-blood glucose testing at alternate sites. Diabetes Care 2002;25:337-341.
18. Van Der Valk PR, Van Der Schatte Olivier-Steding, Wientjes KJ, Schoonen AJ, Hoogenberg K: Alternative-site blood glucose measurement at the abdomen. Diabetes Care 2002;25:2114-2115.
19. Ellison JM, Stegmann JM, Colner SL, Michael RH, Sharma MK, Ervin KR, Horwitz DL: Rapid changes in postprandial blood glucose produce concentration differences at finger, forearm, and thigh sampling sites. Diabetes Care 2002;25:961-964.
20. Holstein A, Thiessen E, Kaufmann N, Plaschke A, Egberts EH: Blood glucose self-monitoring from abdominal skin: a precise and virtually pain-free method. Acta Diabetol 2002;39:97-104.
21. Meguro S, Funae O, Hosokawa K, Atsumi Y: Hypoglycemia detection rate differs among blood glucose monitoring sites. Diabetes Care 2005;28:708-709.
22. McGarraugh G: Response to Jungheim and Koschinsky. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1304-1306.
23. Peled N, Gwalani SL: Timely detection of hypoglycemia by monitoring blood glucose levels of samples obtained from the palm of the hand. Diabetes Technol Ther 2002;4:83-85.
24. Pasyk KA, Thomas SV, Hassett CA, Cherry GW, Faller R: Regional differences in capillary density of the normal human dermis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1989; 83:939-945.
25. McGarraugh G, Price D, Schwartz S, Weinstein R: Physiological influences on off-finger glucose testing. Diabetes Technol Ther 2001;3:367-376.
26. Lucidarme N, Alberti C, Zaccaria I, Claude E, Tubiana-Rufi N: Alternate-site testing is reliable in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes, except at the forearm for hypoglycemia detection. Diabetes Care 2005;28:710-711.
27. Kimberly MM, Caudill SP, Vesper HW, Ethridge SF, Archibold E, Porter KH, Myers GL: Within-person, among-finger variability of capillary blood glucose measurements. Clin Chem 2004;50:2389-2391.
28. AdvaMed Draft Guidance Document. Review criteria for assessment of portable blood glucose monitoring in vitro diagnostic devices: Addendum II: validation of alternative anatomic sites for blood sampling, January 2002. Available at: http://www.advamed.org/ publicdocs/120002fd.pdf (accessed June 2004).
29. Parkes J, Slatin S, Pardo S, Ginsberg B: A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care 2000;23:1143-1148.