Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Chinese class III patients

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 75, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 959-963

  Ming, Tak Chew ^a  

^a National Dental Centre of Singapore   (Singapore)

Author keywords

Cephalometric analysis; Class III malocclusion; Orthognathic surgery

Indexed keywords

EID: 31144451324     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Jensen AC, Sinclair PM, Wolford LM. Soft tissue changes associated with double jaw surgery. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1992;101:266-225.
2. Enacar A, Taner T, Toroglu S. Analysis of soft tissue profile changes associated with mandibular setback and doublejaw surgeries. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg.1999;14:27-35.
3. Hershey HG, Smith LH. Soft tissue profile change associated with surgical correction of the prognathic mandible. Am J Orthod. 1974;83:382-390.
4. Kerr WJS, Ten Have TR. Changes in soft tissue profile during the treatment of Class III malocclusion. Br J Orthod. 1987;14:243-249.
5. Lines PA, Steinhauser WW. Soft tissue changes in relationship to movement of hard structures in orthognathic surgery: a preliminary report. J Oral Surg. 1974;32:891-896.
6. Lin SS, Kerr WJS. Soft and hard tissue changes in Class III patients treated by bimaxillary surgery. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:25-33.
7. Lew KK, Foong WC, Loh E. Malocclusion prevalence in an ethnic Chinese population. Aust Dent J. 1993;38:442-449.
8. Lew KKK, Loh FC, Yeo JF, Loh SA. Evaluation of soft tissue profile following intraoral ramus osteotomy in Chinese adults with mandibular prognathism. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1990;5:189-197.
9. Hu J, Wang D, Luo S, Chen Y. Differences in soft tissue profile changes following mandibular setback in Chinese men and women. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;57:1182-1186.
10. Legan HL, Burstone CJ. Soft tissue cephalometric analysis for orthognathic surgery. J Oral Surg. 1980;38:744-751.
11. Ngan P, Hägg U, Yiu C, Mervin D, Wei SH. Cephalometric comparisons of Chinese and Caucasian surgical Class III patients. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1997;12:177-188.
12. Lew KKK, Ho KK, Keng SB, Ho KH. Soft-tissue cephalometric norms in Chinese adults with esthetic facial profiles. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992;50:1184-1189.
13. Ingervall B, Thuer U, Vuillemin T. Stability and effect on the soft tissue profile of mandibular setback with sagittal split osteotomy and rigid internal fixation. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1995;10:15-25.
14. Suckiel JM, Kohn MW. Soft tissue changes related to the surgical management of mandibular prognathism. Am J Orthod. 1978;73:676-680.
15. Fanibunda KB. Changes in the facial profile following correction for mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1989;27:277-286.
16. Gjørup H, Athanasiou AE. Soft tissue and dentoskeletal pro-file changes associated with mandibular setback osteotomy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;100:312-323.
17. Robinson WW, Spiedel TM, Isaacson RJ, Worms TW. Soft tissue profile change produced by reduction of mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod. 1971;41:227-235.
18. Mansour S, Burstone C, Legan H. An evaluation of soft tissue changes resulting from Le Fort I maxillary surgery. Am J Orthod. 1983;84:37-47.
19. Rosen HM. Lip-nasal aesthetics following LeFort I osteotomy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:171-179.
20. Koh CH, Chew MT. Predictability of soft tissue profile changes following bimaxillary surgery in skeletal III Chinese patients. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. In press.