Robust residual generation for diagnosis including a reference model for residual behavior

Automatica

Volumn 42, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 437-445

  Frisk, Erik ^a   Nielsen, Lars ^a,b  

^a LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b Department of Vehicular Systems ^*  (Sweden)

Author keywords

Fault detection; Model based diagnosis; Reference model; Robustness criterion; Structured uncertainty

Indexed keywords

FAULT DETECTION; MODEL-BASED DIAGNOSIS; REFERENCE MODEL; STRUCTURED UNCERTAINTY;

DIAGNOSIS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPTIMIZATION; PROBLEM SOLVING; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 31144449375     PISSN: 00051098     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.automatica.2005.10.009     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Chen, J., & Patton, R. J. (1994). A re-examination of fault detectability and isolability in linear dynamic systems. Fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 567-573). Espoo, Finland, IFAC.
2. Edelmayer, A., Bokor, J., & Keviczky, L. (1994). An H ∞ filtering approach to robust detection of failures in dynamic systems. In IEEE conference on decision and control (pp. 3037-3039).
3. Eich, J., & Oehler, R. (1997). On the application of the generalized structured singular value to robust FDI system design. In IFAC fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 885-890). Hull, UK.
4. P.M. Frank, and X. Ding Frequency domain approach to optimally robust residual generation and evaluation for model-based fault diagnosis Automatica 30 5 1994 789 804
5. Frisk, E. (2001). Residual generation for fault diagnosis. Ph.D. thesis, Linkop̈ing University.
6. Frisk, E., & Nielsen, L. (1999). Robust residual generation for diagnosis including a reference model for residual behavior. In Proceedings of the IFAC world congress: Vol. P (pp. 55-60). Beijing, China.
7. E. Frisk, and M. Nyberg A minimal polynomial basis solution to residual generation for fault diagnosis in linear systems Automatica 37 2001 1417 1424
8. Gertler, J. (1991). Analytical redundancy methods in fault detection and isolation; survey and synthesis. IFAC fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 9-21). Baden-Baden, Germany.
9. X. Lou, A. Willsky, and G. Verghese Optimally robust redundancy relations for failure detection in uncertain systems Automatica 22 3 1986 333 344
10. Mangoubi, R., Appleby, B. D., Verghese, G. C., & VanderVelde, W. E. (1995). A robust failure detection and isolation algorithm. In IEEE conference on decision and control (pp. 2377-2382).
11. Niemann, H., & Stoustrup, J. (1997). Integration of control and fault detection: Nominal and robust design. IFAC fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 341-346). Hull, UK.
12. Niemann, H., & Stoustrup, J. (2000). Design of fault detectors using H ∞ optimization. In IEEE conference on decision and control.
13. M. Nyberg Criterions for detectability and strong detectability of faults in linear systems International Journal of Control 75 7 2002 490 501
14. R.J. Patton, and J. Chen Optimal unknown input distribution matrix selection in robust fault diagnosis Automatica 29 4 1993 837 841
15. R.J. Patton, and M. Hou Design of fault detection and isolation observers: A matrix pencil approach Automatica 34 9 1998
16. Qiu, Z., & Gertler, J. (1994). Robust FDI systems and H ∞ -optimization. IFAC fault detection, supervision and safety for technical processes (pp. 247-252). Espoo, Finland.
17. Tyler, M. L., & Morari, M. (1994). Optimal and robust design of integrated control and diagnostic modules. In American control conference.
18. Wünnenberg, J. (1990). Observer-based fault detection in dynamic systems. Ph.D. thesis, University of Duisburg.
19. M. Zhong, S.X. Ding, J. Lam, and H. Wang An LMI approach to design robust fault detection filter for uncertain systems Automatica 39 2003 543 550
20. K. Zhou, J.C. Doyle, and K. Glover Robust and optimal control 1995 Prentice-Hall Englewood Cliffs, NJ