Comparing ultrasound measurements of neonatal hips using the methods of Graf and Terjesen

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery - Series B

Volumn 88, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 104-106

  Falliner, A ^a   Schwinzer, D ^a   Hahne, H J ^a   Hedderich, J ^a   Hassenpflug, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; ECHOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP DYSPLASIA; HUMAN; INFANT; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT EXAMINATION; KAPPA STATISTICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEWBORN ASSESSMENT; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; HIP DISLOCATION, CONGENITAL; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; NEONATAL SCREENING; OBSERVER VARIATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 31144442301     PISSN: 0301620X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.88B1.16419     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Graf R. The diagnosis of congenital hip-joint dislocation by the ultrasonic combound treatment. Arch Orthop Traumat Surg 1980;97:117-33.
2. Harcke HT, Clarke NMP, Lee MS, Borns PF, MacEwen GD. Examination of the infant hip with real-time ultrasonography. J Ultrasound Med 1984;3:131-7.
3. Terjesen T, Rundén TO, Tangerud A. Ultrasonography and radiography of the hip in infants. Acta Orthop Scand 1989;60:651-60.
4. Terjesen T, Bredland T, Berg V. Ultrasound for hip assessment in the newborn. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1989;71-B:767-73.
5. Falliner A, Hahne HJ, Hassenpflug J. Sonographic investigations of anatomical specimens of infant hip joints. J Pediatr Orthop B 2002;11:192-203.
6. Falliner A, Hahne HJ, Hedderich J, Brossmann J, Hassenpflug J. Comparable ultrasound measurements of ten anatomical specimens of infant hip joints by the methods of Graf and Terjesen. Acta Radiologica 2004;45:227-35.
7. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986;i:307-10.
8. International Organization for Standardization. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurements methods and results: Part I: general principles and definitions (ISO 5725-1) Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 1994.
9. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlation: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychological Bulletin 1979;86:420-8.
10. Landis JR, Koch GC. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-74.
11. Czubak J, Kotwicki T, Piontek T, Skrzpek H. Ultrasound measurements of the newborn hip: comparison of two methods in 657 newborns. Acta Orthop Scand 1998; 69:21-4.
12. Mau H, Michaelis H. Zur Häufigkeit und Entwicklung auffallendar Hüftbefunde (dysplasie-komplex) bei Neugeborener und Kleinkindern. Z Orthop 1983;121:601-7
13. Irha E, Vrdoljak J, Vrdoljak O. Evaluation of ultrasonographic angle and linear parameters in the diagnosis of developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Pediatr Orthop B 2004;13:9-14.
14. Wiese H. Die sonographie der normalen säuglingshüfte und die abgrenzung zu pathologischen veränderungen. Dissertation Tübingen 1986.
15. Roovers EA, Boere-Boonekamp MM, Geertsma TSA, Zielhuis GA, Kerkhoff AHM. Ultrasonographic screening for development dysplasia of the hip in infants. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2003;85-B:726-30.