Learning attribute selections for non-pronominal expressions

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn 2000-October, Issue , 2000, Pages

  Jordan, Pamela ^a   Walker, Marilyn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b AT AND T LABS RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FEATURE SELECTION;

ATTRIBUTE SELECTION; DIALOGUE SYSTEMS; HUMAN PERFORMANCE; MACHINE-LEARNING; SELECTION MODEL; TASK DOMAIN; TASK-ORIENTED;

SPEECH PROCESSING;

EID: 31144440504     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. James Allen and Mark Core. 1997. Draft of DAMSL: Dialog act markup in several layers.
2. Susan E. Brennan and Herbert H. Clark. 1996. Lexical choice and conceptual pacts in conversation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory And Cognition.
3. Herbert H. Clark and Catherine R. Marshall. 1981. Definite reference and mutual knowledge. In Joshi, Webber, and Sag, editors, Elements of Discourse Understanding, pages 10-63. CUP, Cambridge.
4. Herbert H. Clark and Deanna Wilkes-Gibbs. 1986. Referring EtS Et collaborative process. Cognition, 22:1-39.
5. Paul R. Cohen. 1995. Empirical Methods for Artificial Intelligence. MIT Press, Boston.
6. William Cohen. 1996. Learning trees and rules with set-valued features. In Fourteenth Conference of the American Association of Artificial Intelligence.
7. Robert Dale and Ehud Reiter. 1995. Computational Interpretations of the Gricean Maxims in the Generation of Referring Expressions. Cognitive Science, 19(2):233-263, Apr-June.
8. Barbara Di Eugenio, Pamela W. Jordan, Johanna D. Moore, and Richmond H. Thomason. 1998. An empirical investigation of collaborative dialogues. In ACL-COLING98, Proceedings of the Thirty-sixth Conference of the Association for Computational Linguistics, Montreal, Canada, August.
9. Barbara Di Eugenio, Pamela W. Jordan, Richmond H. Thomason, and Johanna D. Moore. 2000. The agreement process: An empirical investigation of human-human computer-mediated collaborative dialogues. To Appear in International Journal of Human-Computer Studies.
10. Barbara J. Grosz and Candace L. Sidner. 1986. Attention, intentions and the structure of discourse. Computational Linguistics, 12:175-204.
11. Julia B. Hirschberg. 1993. Pitch accent in context: predicting intonational prominence from text. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 63:305-340.
12. Pamela W. Jordan. 2000. Intentional Influences on Object Redescriptions in Dialogue: Evidence from an Empirical Study. Ph.D. thesis, Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh.
13. Chris Mellish, Alistair Knott, Jon Oberlander, and Mick O'Donnell. 1998. Experiments using stochastic search for text planning. In Proceedings of International Conference on Natural Language Generation, pages 97-108.
14. Margaret G. Moser and Johanna Moore. 1995. Investigating cue selection and placement in tutorial discourse. In ACL 95, pages 130-137.
15. Jon Oberlander. 1998. Do the right thing⋯but expect the unexpected. Computational Linguistics, 24(3):501-508.
16. Rebecca J. Passonneau. 1995. Integrating Gricean and Attentional Constraints. In Proceedings of IJCAI 95.
17. Massimo Poesio. 2000. Annotating a corpus to develop and evaluate discourse entity realization algorithms: issues and preliminary results. In Proc. Language Resources and Evaluation Conference, LREC-2000.
18. Ellen F. Prince. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given-new information. In Radical Pragmatics, pages 223-255. Academic Press.
19. Michael Strube and Maria Wolters. 2000. A probabilistic genre-independent model of pronomi-nalization. In Proceedings of the North American Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 18-25.
20. J. M. B. Terken. 1985. Use and Function of Accentuation: Some Experiments. Ph.D. thesis, Institute for Perception Research, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
21. Marilyn A. Walker. 1996. Limited attention and discourse structure. Computational Linguistics, 22-2:255-264.
22. Ching-Long Yeh and Chris Mellish. 1997. An empirical study on the generation of anaphora in Chinese. Computational Linguistics, 23-1:169-190.