Advantages of adaptive speckle filtering prior to application of iterative deconvolution methods for optical coherent tomography imaging

Optical and Quantum Electronics

Volumn 37, Issue 13-15, 2005, Pages 1225-1238

  Paes, Stephane ^a   Ryu, Seon Young ^a   Na, Jihoon ^a   Choi, Eunseo ^a   Lee, Byeong Ha ^a   Hong, In Ki ^b  

^a Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology (GIST)   (South Korea)

^b Korea Polytechnic University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Image processing; Iterative deconvolution methods; Optical coherence tomography; Speckle filtering

Indexed keywords

IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING SYSTEMS; OPTICAL SYSTEMS; SPECKLE; TOMOGRAPHY;

DECONVOLUTION; ITERATIVE DECONVOLUTION METHODS; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; SPECKLE FILTERING;

ADAPTIVE FILTERING;

EID: 31144439970     PISSN: 03068919     EISSN: 1572817X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11082-005-4194-5     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Crilly, P.B. IEEE Trans. Instrum. meas. 40, 1991.
2. Frost, V.S., J.A. Stiles, K.S. Shanmugan and J.C. Holtzman. IEEE Trans. pattern anal machina intell. PAMI-4, 1982.
3. Jansson, P.A. Deconvolution of Images and Spectra, 2nd edn. Academic Press, Inc., 1997.
4. Kuan, D.T., A.A. Sawchuck, T.C. Strand and P. Chavel. IEEE Trans. Acoustics, Speech Signal Processing, ASSP-35, 1987.
5. Kulkarni, M.D., C.W. Thomas and J.A. Izatt. Electron. Lett. 33 1365, 1997.
6. Kulkarni, M.D. and J.A. Izatt. Coherence Domain in Biomedical Sciences and Clinical Applications. Ca. society of photo-instrument engineering, San Jose, 1997.
7. Lee, J.S. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Machine Intell. PAMI-2, 1980.
8. Lopes, A., R. Touzi and E. Nezry. IEEE Transaction Goosci. Remote Sensing 28, 1990.
9. Schafer, R.W., R.M. Mersereau and M.A. Richards. Proceedings of the IEEE, Special Issue on Digital Image Processing. 69, 1981.
10. Schmitt, J.M., H. Xiang and K.M. Yung. J. Biomed. Opt. 4 95, 1999.
11. Rogowska, J. and M.E. Brezinski, IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 19, 2000.