Latency Differences of N20, P40/N60, P100/N140 SEP Components after Stimulation of Proximal and Distal Sites of the Median Nerve

Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Volumn 37, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 25-29

  Hada, Y ^a  

^a TEIKYO UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Central Processing Time; Event Related Potentials; Median Nerve; Somatosensory Evoked Potentials

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; ELBOW; ELECTRODE; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EVOKED SOMATOSENSORY RESPONSE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LATENT PERIOD; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; NERVE CONDUCTION; NERVE FUNCTION; NERVE STIMULATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WRIST;

ADULT; BRAIN; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS, SOMATOSENSORY; HUMANS; MALE; MEDIAN NERVE; REACTION TIME;

EID: 31144438362     PISSN: 15500594     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/155005940603700106     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Desmedt JE Huy NT Bourguet M. The cognitive P40, N60 and P100 component of somatosensory evoked potentials and the earliest electrical signs of sensory processing in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1983; 56: 272-282.
2. Yamada T Muroga T Kimura J. Tourniquet-induced ischemia and somatosensory evoked potentials. Neurology 1981; 31(12):1524-1529.
3. Ito J Shibasaki H Kimura J. Somatosensory event-related potentials following different stimulus conditions. Intern J Neurosci 1992; 65: 239-246.
4. Garcia-Larrea L Lukaszewicz AC Mauguiere F. Somatosensory responses during selective spatial attention: The N120-to-N140 transition. Psychophysiology 1995; 32: 526-537.
5. Desmedt JE Ozaki I. SEPs to finger joint input lack the N20-P20 response that is evoked by tactile inputs: contrast between cortical generators in area 3b and 2 in humans. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1991; 80(6):513-521.
6. Wood CC Cohen D Cuffin BN Yarita M Allison T. Electrical sources in human somatosensory cortex: identification by combined magnetic and potential recordings. Science 1985; 227(4690):1051-1053.
7. Allison T McCarthy G Wood CC Darcey TM Spencer DD Williamson PD. Human cortical potentials evoked by stimulation of the median nerve. I. Cytoarchitectonic areas generating short-latency activity. J Neurophysiology 1989; 62(3):694-710.
8. Noguchi Y Yamada T Yen M Matsubara M Kokubun Y Kawada J Shiraishi G Kajimoto S. Dissociated changes of frontal and parietal somatosensory evoked potentials in sleep. Neurology 1995; 45(1): 154-160.
9. Tomberg C Desmedt JE. Non-averaged human brain potentials in somatic attention: the short-latency cognitive-related P40 component. J Physiology 1996; 496(2):559-574.
10. Inui K Wang XH Tamura Y Kaneoke Y Kakigi R. Serial processing in the human somatosensory system. Cerebral Cortex 2004; 14(8):851-857.
11. Koziel H. Effect of selective attention on somatosensory evoked potentials in healthy people. Acta Physiol Pol 1985; 36(2):117-125.
12. Nakajima Y Imamura N. Probability and interstimulus interval effects on the N140 and the P300 components of somatosensory ERPs. Int J Neurosci 2000; 104: 75-91.
13. Desmedt JE Tomberg C. Mapping early somatosensory evoked potentials in selective attention: critical evaluation of control conditions used for titrating by difference the cognitive P30, P40, P100 and N140. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 74: 321-346.
14. Nakajima Y Imamura N. Relationships between attention effects and intensity effects on the cognitive N140 and P300 components of somatosensory ERPs. Clin Neurophysiol 2000; 111: 1711-1718.
15. Michie PT Bearpark HM Crawford JM Glue LCT. The effects of spatial selective attention on the somatosensory event-related potential. Psychophysiology 1987; 24(4):449-463.