Property regimes for home-sharers: The civil partnership bill and some antipodean models

Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 361-375

  Wong, Simone ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Civil Partnership Bill; Cohabitation; Property regimes; Relationship breakdown

Indexed keywords

EID: 31044451740     PISSN: 09649069     EISSN: 14699621     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0964906042000334055     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bottomley, A. (1993), ‘Self and Subjectivities: Languages of Claim in Property Law’, Journal of Law and Society 20: 56-70
2. Department of Trade and Industry, Women & Equality Unit (2003a), Consultation on Civil Partnership: A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples, London: DTI.
3. Department of Trade and Industry, Women & Equality Unit (2003b), Responses to Civil Partnership: A framework for the legal recognition of same-sex couples, London: DTI.
4. Diduck, A. (2001), ‘Fairness and Justice for All? The House of Lords in White v White [2000] 2 FLR 981’, Feminist Legal Studies 9(2): 173-183.
5. Eekelaar, J. (1987) ‘A Woman’s Place - A Convict between Law and Social Values’, Conv: 93-102.
6. Gardner, S. (1993), ‘Rethinking Family Property’, Law Quarterly Review 109: 263-300.
7. Glover, N. and Todd, P. (1996), ‘The Myth of Common Intention’, Legal Studies 16: 325-347.
8. Graycar, R. and Millbank, J. (2000), ‘The Bride Wore Pink… to the Property (Relationships) Legislation Amendment Act 1999: Relationships Law Reform in New South Wales’, Canadian Journal of Family Law 17: 227-282.
9. Jessep, O. (2000), ‘Financial Adjustment in Domestic Relationships in NSW: Some Problems of Interpretation’, Seminar Papers: A Discussion Forum on Relationships and the Law, Law Reform Commission Publications, 7 July 2000, available at http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lrc.nsf/pages/ seminar01.04 (last visited 24 May 2004).
10. Joint Committee on Human Rights (2004), Civil Partnership Bill, Fifteenth Report of Session 2003-04, HL Paper 136, HC 885.
11. Katzen, H. and Shaw, M. (1993), The Bride Wore Pink, 1st ed, Sydney: GLRL.
12. Law Commission (2002), Sharing Homes: A Discussion Paper Law Com. No. 278. London: Law Commission.
13. Law Society (2002), Cohabitation: The case for clear law: Proposals for reform (July 2002). London: Law Society.
14. Lawson, A. (1996), ‘The Things We Do for Love: Detrimental Reliance in the Family Home’, Legal Studies 16: 218-231.
15. Legislative Council Standing Committee on Social Issues (1999) Domestic Relationships: Issues for Reform: Inquiry into De Facto Relationships Legislation, Report 20.
16. Lund-Andersen, I. (2001), ‘The Danish Registered Partnership Act 1989 - Has the Act Meant a Change in Attitudes?’ in Wintemute, R. and Andenas, M. (eds), Legal Recognition of Same-sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
17. Millbank, J. (1998), ‘If Australian Law Opened its Eyes to Lesbian and Gay Families, What Would it See?’, Australian Journal of Family Law, AJFL LEXIS 10.
18. Millbank, J. (1999), ‘The De Facto Relationships Amendment Bill 1998 (NSW): The Adler, M. (1994) ‘The Habitual Residence Test: a Critical Analysis’ 2 JSSL 179.
19. Billings, H. (2004) ‘Brussels ‘Concerned’ at Crackdown on new EU’, EUPolitix.com 24.2.2004.
20. Davies, G. (2004) ‘The high water point of free movement of persons: ending benefit tourism and rescuing welfare’, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 26(2).
21. EurActiv.com (2004) ‘No Mass Influx of foreign workers into UK and Sweden after enlargement’ EurActiv.com, 27.08.2004.
22. Home Office (2004) ‘New EU Citizens Working and Contributing’, Home Office Press Release 224/04 7 July 2004. Available from www.homeoffice. gov.uk.
23. Kirk, L. (2004a) ‘Sweden sees no sign of ‘social tourism’ after EU Enlargement’, EUObserver.com 25.08.2004.
24. Kirk, L. (2004b) ‘Sweden: sharp rise in applications from new EU Workers’, EUObserver.com 20.09.2004.
25. Lumsden, D. (2004) ‘Post-Enlargement curbs may break EU law’, EUPolitix. com 13.2.2004.
26. Mahony, H. (2004a) ‘Sharp Rise in number of new EU Workers to Ireland’, EUObserver.com 09.08.2004.
27. Mahony, H. (2004b) ‘Dutch work permits for new EU Citizens doubles’, EUObserver.com 18.08.2004.
28. SSAC (2004) Report on the Social Security (Habitual Residence) Amendment Regulations 2004 (CM 6181). London: The Stationery Office.
29. Millbank, J. (2000), ‘Domestic Rifts: Who is using the Domestic Relationships Act 1994 (ACT)?’, Australian Family Law Journal 14, AJFL LEXIS 11.
30. Millbank, J. and Morgan, W. (2001), ‘Let Them Eat Cake and Ice Cream: Wanting Something “More” from the Relationship Recognition Menu’ in Wintemute, R. and Andenas, M. (eds), Legal Recognition of Same-sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.
31. Milllbank, J. and Sant, K. (2000), ‘A Bride in Her Everyday Clothes: Same Sex Relationship Recognition in NSW’, Sydney Law Review 22: 181-219.
32. Neave, M. (1991) ‘Living Together - Legal Effects of the Sexual Division of Labour in Four Common Law Countries’, Monash University Law Review 17: 14-63.
33. Waaldijk, K. (2001), ‘Small Change: How the Road to Same Sex Marriage Got Paved in the Netherlands’ in Wintemute, R. and Andenas, M. (eds), Legal Recognition of Same-sex Partnerships: A Study of National, European and International Law, Oxford: Hart Publishing.