|
|
Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 618-643
|
|
Fairly Bland: An alternative view of a supposed new ‘Death Ethic’ and the BMA guidelines
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AIREDALE NHS TRUST V. BLAND;
ARTICLE;
BEHAVIOR;
BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS;
HOMICIDE;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL SOCIETY;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
POLICY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SOCIOECONOMICS;
STANDARD;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
UNITED KINGDOM;
WITHHOLDING OR WITHDRAWING LIFE-PROLONGING MEDICAL TREATMENT: GUIDANCE FOR DECISION MAKING (BMA);
AIREDALE NHS TRUST V. BLAND;
BRITISH MEDICAL ASSOCIATION;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE;
WITHHOLDING OR WITHDRAWING LIFE-PROLONGING MEDICAL TREATMENT: GUIDANCE FOR DECISION MAKING (BMA);
ADULT;
DECISION MAKING;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
GREAT BRITAIN;
GUIDELINES;
HOMICIDE;
HUMANS;
INTENTION;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT;
ORGANIZATIONAL POLICY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
SOCIETIES, MEDICAL;
VALUE OF LIFE;
|
|
EID: 31044450803
PISSN: 02613875
EISSN: 1748121X
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-121X.2001.tb00183.x Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (23)
|
|
References (0)
|
