A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluation of patients undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery for pelvic organ prolapse using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system

International Urogynecology Journal

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 46-49

  Vierhout, Mark E ^a   Stoutjesdijk, Jackie ^a   Spruijt, Johan ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Pelvic examination; Pelvic organ prolapse; Pelvic reconstructive surgery; POP Q staging

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION FUNCTION; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PELVIC ORGAN PROLAPSE; PELVIS SURGERY; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STANDARDIZATION;

EID: 31044434786     PISSN: 09373462     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-005-1347-9     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Olsen AL, Smith V, Bergstrom JO, Colling JC, Clark AL (1997) Epidemiology of surgically managed pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence. Obstet Gynecol 89:501-506 10.1016/S0029-7844(97)00058-6
2. Friedman EA, Little WA (1961) The conflict of nomenclature for descensus uteri. Am J Obstet Gynecol 81:817-820 13701998
3. Porges RF (1963) A practical system of diagnosis and classification of pelvic relaxations. Surg Gynecol Obstet 117:761-773
4. Baden WF, Walker TA (1972) Genesis of the vaginal profile: A correlated classification of pelvic relaxation. Clin Obstet Gynecol 15:1048-1054 4649139
5. Brubaker L, Norton P (1996) Current clinical nomenclature for description of pelvic organ prolapse. J Pelvic Surg 2:257-259
6. Bump RC, Matiason A, Bo K, Brubaker LP, DeLancey JOL, Klarskov P, Shull BL, Smith ARB (1996) The standardisation of terminology of female pelvic floor dysfunction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:10-17 8694033
7. Hall AF, Theofrastous JP, Cundiff GW, Harris RL, Hamilton LF, Swift SE, Bump RC (1996) Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of the proposed International Continence Society, Society of Gynecologic Surgeons and American Urogynecologic Society pelvic organ prolapse classification system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 175:1467-1471 8987926
8. Steele A, Malipeddi P, Welgoss J, Soled S, Kohli N, Karram M (1998) Teaching the pelvic organ prolapse quantitation system. Am J Obstet Gynecol 179:1458-1464 9855581
9. Bland DR, Earle BB, Vitolins MZ, Burke G (1999) Use of the pelvic organ prolapse staging system of the International Continence Society in perimenopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 181:1324-1328 10601907
10. Nichols DH, Randall CL (1996) Vaginal surgery. 4th edn. Williams& Wilkins, Baltimore
11. Vineyard DD, Kuehl TJ, Coates KW, Shull BL (2002) A comparison of preoperative and intraoperative evaluations for patients who undergo site-specific operation for the correction of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol 186:1155-1159 10.1067/mob.2002.122985
12. Haeusler G, Sam G, Chiari A, Tempfer C, Hanzal E, Koelbl H (1998) Effect of spinal anesthesia on the lower urinary tract in continent women. Br J Obstet Gynecol 105:103-106
13. Bartsscht KD, DeLancey JOL (1988) A technique to study the passive supports of the uterus. Obstet Gynecol 72:940-943 3186104
14. Handa VL, Garett E, Hendrix S, Gold E, Robbins J (2004) Progression and remission of pelvic organ prolapse: A longitudinal study of menopausal women. Am J Obstet Gynecol 190:27-32 10.1016/j.ajog.2003.07.017