Renal transplant biopsy specimen adequacy in a paediatric population

Pediatric Nephrology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 265-269

  Durkan, Anne M ^a,c   Beattie, T James ^a   Howatson, Allan ^a   McColl, John H ^b   Ramage, Ian J ^a  

^a ROYAL HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^c HOSPITAL FOR SICK CHILDREN   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adequacy; Banff; Biopsy; Kidney; Pediatric; Transplant

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE; ARTICLE; BANFF 97 GUIDELINE; CHILD; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; KIDNEY ALLOGRAFT REJECTION; KIDNEY BIOPSY; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; NEEDLE; PEDIATRIC SURGERY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; SEDATION; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TISSUE SECTION;

ADOLESCENT; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION;

EID: 30944454918     PISSN: 0931041X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00467-005-2076-5     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Solez K, Axelsen RA, Bendiktsson H, Burdick JF, Cohen AH, Colvin RB, Croker BP, Droz D, Dunnill MS, Halloran PF, Hayry P, Mennette JC, Keown PA, Macussen N, Mihatsch MJ, Morozumi K, Myers BD, Nast CC, Olsen S, Racusen LC, Ramos EL, Rosen S, Sachs DH, Salomon DR, Sanfilippo F, Verani R, Von Willebrand E, Yamaguchi Y (1993) International standardization of criteria for the histological diagnosis of renal allograft rejection: The Banff working classification of kidney transplant pathology. Kidney Int 44:411-422 8377384
2. Racusen LC, Solez K, Colvin RB, Bonsib SM, Castro MC, Cavallo T, Croker BP, Demetris AJ, Drachenberg CB, Fogo AB, Furness P, Gaber LW, Gibson IW, Glotz D, Goldberg JC, Grande J, Halloran PF, Hansen HE, Hartley B, Hayry PJ, Hill CM, Hoffman EO, Hunsicker LG, Lindblad AS, Marcussen N, Mihatsch MJ, Nadasdy T, Nickerson P, Olsen TS, Papadimitriou JC, Randhawa PS, Rayner DC, Roberts I, Rose S, Rush D, Salinas-Madrigal L, Salomon DR, Sund S, Taskinen E, Trpkov K, Yamaguchi Y (1999) The Banff 97 working classification of renal allograft pathology. Kidney Int 55(2):713-723 10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00299.x
3. Palomar R, Ruiz JC, Zubimendi JA, Cotorruelo JG, Hernandez H, Rodrigo E, Val Bernal JF, Arias M (2002) Is there any correlation between pathologic changes for acute rejection in kidney transplantation (Banff 97) and graft function? Transplant Proc 34:349 10.1016/ S0041-1345(01)02794-4
4. Haas M, Kraus ES, Samaniego-Picota M, Racusen LC, Ni W, Eustace JA (2002) Acute renal allograft rejection with intimal arteritis: Histological predictors of response to therapy and graft survival. Kidney Int 61:1516-1526 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00254.x
5. Tanaka T, Kyo M, Kokado Y, Takahara S, Hatori M, Suzuki K, Hasumi M, Toki K, Ichimaru N, Yazawa K, Hanafusa T, Namba Y, Oka K, Moriyama T, Imai E, Okuyama A, Yamanaka (2004) Correlation between the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft biopsies and clinical outcome. Transpl Int 17:59-64 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2004.tb00405.x
6. Mueller A, Schnuelle P, Waldherr R, van der Woude F (2000) Impact of the Banff 97 classification for histological diagnosis of rejection on clinical outcome and renal function parameters after kidney transplantation. Transplantation 69(6):1123-1127 10.1097/ 00007890-200003270-00017
7. Racusen LC, Colvin RB, Solez K, Mihatsch MJ, Halloran PF, Campbell PM, Cecka MJ, Cosyns JP, Demetris AJ, Fishbein MC, Fogo A, Furness P, Gibson IW, Glotz D, Hayry P, Hunsickern L, Kashgarian M, Kerman R, Magil AJ, Montgomery R, Morozumi K, Nickeleit V, Randhawa P, Regele H, Seron D, Seshan S, Sund S, Trpkov K (2003) Antibody mediated rejection criteria-an addition to the Banff 97 classification of renal allograft rejection. Am J Transplant 3:708-714 10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00072.x
8. McDonald MW, Sosnowski JT, Mahin EJ, Willard DA, Lamm DL (1993) Automatic spring-loaded biopsy gun with ultrasonic control for renal transplant biopsy. Urology 42(5):580-582 10.1016/0090-4295(93)90280-N
9. Nicholson ML, Attard AR, Bell A, Donnelly PK, Veitch PS, Bell PRF (1990) Renal transplant biopsy using real-time ultrasound guidance. Br J Urol 65:564-565 2196969
10. Cahen R, Trolliet P, Jean G, Megri K, Dijoud F, Francois B (1995) Automated renal transplant biopsy with real-time ultrasonic guidance. Transplant Proc 27(2):1729-1730 7725473
11. Nankivell BJ, Borrows RJ, Fung CLS, O'Connell P, Allen RDM, Chapman JR (2004) Evolution and pathophysiology of renal-transplant glomerulosclerosis. Transplantation 78(3):461-468 10.1097/ 01.TP.0000128612.75163.26
12. Hussain F, Watson AR, Hayes J, Evans J (2003) Standards for renal biopsies: Comparison of inpatient and day care procedures. Pediatr Nephrol 18:53-56 10.1007/s00467-002-1003-2
13. Quiroga I, Morris-Stiff G, Baboo R, Griffiths D, Baboola K, Moore R, Darby C, Lord R, Jurewicz AW (2001) The new Banff classification of renal transplant biopsies: A major impact on the adequacy of the cores taken. Transplant Proc 33:1154-1155 10.1016/S0041-1345(00)02439-8
14. Beckingham IJ, Nicholson ML, Kirk G, Veitch PS, Bell PRF (1994) Comparison of three methods to obtain percutaneous needle core biopsies of a renal allograft. Br J Surg 81:898-899 8044616
15. Nicholson ML, Wheatley TJ, Doughman TM, White SA, Morgan JDT, Veitch PS, Furness PN (2000) A prospective randomized trial of three different sizes of core-cutting needle for renal transplant biopsy. Kidney Int 58(1):390-395 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2000.00177.x
16. Vidhun J, Masciandro J, Varich L, Salvatierra O, Sarwal M (2003) Safety and risk stratification of percutaneous biopsies of adult-sized renal allografts in infant and older pediatric recipients. Transplantation 76(3):552-557 10.1097/01.TP.0000076097.90123.21
17. Beckingham IJ, Nicholson ML, Bell PRF (1994) Analysis of factors associated with complications following renal transplant needle core biopsy. Br J Urol 73:13-15 8298893
18. Benfield MR, Herrin J, Feld L, Rose S, Stablein D, Tejani A (1999) Safety of kidney biopsy in pediatric transplantation: A report of the controlled clinical trials in pediatric transplantation trial of induction therapy study group. Transplantation 67(4):544-547 10.1097/ 00007890-199902270-00010
19. Furness PN, Taub N (2001) International variation in the interpretation of renal transplant biopsies: Report of the CERTPAP project. Kidney Int 60(5):1998-2012 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2001.00030.x
20. Howie AJ (2002) Problems with Banff. Transplantation 73(9):1383-1384 10.1097/00007890-200205150-00003
21. Furness PN, Taub N, Assmann KJ, Banfi G, Cosyns JP, Dorman A, Hill CM, Kapper SK, Waldherr R, Laurinavicius A, Marcussen N, Martins AP, Nogueira M, Regele H, Seron D, Carrera M, Sund S, Taskinen EI, Paavonen T, Tihomirova T, Rosenthal R (2003) International variation in histological gradings is large and persistent feedback does not improve reproducibility. Am J Surg Path 27(6):805-810 10.1097/ 00000478-200306000-00012