Assessment of image guided accuracy in a skull model: Comparison of frameless stereotaxy techniques vs. frame-based localization

Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Volumn 76, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 65-70

  Quiñones Hinojosa, Alfredo ^a   Ware, Marcus L ^a   Sanai, Nader ^a   McDermott, Michael W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biopsy; Frame based localization; Image guidance

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BRAIN BIOPSY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IN VITRO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTION; RANK SUM TEST; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STEREOTAXIC SURGERY;

BIOPSY; BRAIN; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURONAVIGATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SKULL; SOFTWARE; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 30944453864     PISSN: 0167594X     EISSN: 15737373     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-005-2915-z     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. GH Barnett DW Miller J Weisenberger 1999 Frameless stereotaxy with scalp-applied fiducial markers for brain biopsy procedures: Experience in 218 cases J Neurosurg 91 569-576 10507376 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvjsFaisg%3D%3D
2. NL Dorward TS Paleologos O Alberti DG Thomas 2002 The advantages of frameless stereotactic biopsy over frame-based biopsy Br J Neurosurg 16 110-118 12046728 1:STN:280:DC%2BD38zgsFOjtQ%3D%3D
3. Paleologos TS, Dorward NL, Wadley JP, Thomas DG: Clinical validation of true frameless stereotactic biopsy: Analysis of the first 125 consecutive cases. Neurosurgery 49: 830-835; discussion 835-837, 2001.
4. Smith JS, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Barbaro NM, McDermott MW: Frame-based stereotactic biopsy remains an important diagnostic tool with distinct advantages over frameless stereotactic biopsy. J Neurooncol, 2004.
5. MJ Fritsch MJ Leber L Gossett BA Lulu AJ Hamilton 1998 Stereotactic biopsy of intracranial brain lesions. High diagnostic yield without increased complications: 65 consecutive biopsies with early postoperative CT scans Stereotact Funct Neurosurg 71 36-42 10072672 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7nt1altw%3D%3D
6. Quinones-Hinojosa A, Sanai N, McDermott MW: Assessment of image guided accuracy using two types of disposable biopsy guides as compared to frame-based localization, in, American Association of Neurological Surgeons Abstract Archive (http://www.aans.org/Library/Article.aspx?ArticleId=12387), 2002.
7. Fontaine D, Dormont D, Hasboun D, Clemenceau S, Valery C, Oppenheim C, Sahel M, Marsault C, Philippon J, Cornu P: Magnetic resonance-guided stereotactic biopsies: Results in 100 consecutive cases. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142: 249-255; discussion 255-246, 2000.
8. J McInerney DW Roberts 2000 Frameless stereotaxy of the brain Mt Sinai J Med 67 300-310 11021780 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmsFymtA%3D%3D
9. Moriarty TM, Quinones-Hinojosa A, Larson PS, Alexander E 3rd, Gleason PL, Schwartz RB, Jolesz FA, Black PM: Frameless stereotactic neurosurgery using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging: stereotactic brain biopsy. Neurosurgery 47: 1138-1145; discussion 1145-1136, 2000.
10. Wen DY, Hall WA, Miller DA, Seljeskog EL, Maxwell RE: Targeted brain biopsy: A comparison of freehand computed tomography-guided and stereotactic techniques. Neurosurgery 32: 407412; discussion 412-403, 1993.
11. IM Germano JV Queenan 1998 Clinical experience with intracranial brain needle biopsy using frameless surgical navigation Comput Aided Surg 3 33-39 9699077 10.1002/ (SICI)1097-0150(1998)3:1<33::AID-IGS5>3.0.CO;2-M 1:STN:280:DyaK1czmsVagsQ%3D%3D