Comparison of three imaging systems for water-sensitive papers

Applied Engineering in Agriculture

Volumn 21, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 961-964

  Hoffmann, Wesley Clint ^a   Hewitt, Andrew J ^b  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Droplet size; DropletScan ; Imaging; Swath Kit ; Water sensitive card; WSP

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DEPOSITION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING SYSTEMS; PAPER;

DROPLET SIZE SPECTRA; SPREAD FACTOR EQUATION; WATER SENSITIVE PAPERS;

AGRICULTURAL CHEMICALS;

AGRICULTURE; CORRELATION; DEPOSITION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PAPER;

EID: 30944453675     PISSN: 08838542     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. ASAE Standards, 46th ed. 1999. S572. Spray nozzle classification by droplet spectra. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE.
2. Fox, R. D., M. Salyani, J. A. Cooper, and R. D. Brazee. 2001. Spot size comparisons on oil- and water-sensitive paper. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 17(2): 131-136
3. Hill, B. D., and D. J. Inaba. 1989. Use of water-sensitive paper to monitor the deposition of aerially applied insecticides. J. of Economic Entomology 82(3): 974-980.
4. Kirk, I. W., L. F. Bouse, J. B. Carlton, and E. Franz. 1991. Aerial application parameters influence spray deposition in cotton canopies. ASAE Paper No. AA91007. St. Joseph, Mich.: ASAE
5. Salyani, M., and R. P. Cromwell. 1992. Spray drift from ground and aerial application. Transactions of the ASAE 35(4): 1113-1120.
6. Whitney, R. W., and D. R. Gardisser. 2003. DropletScan™ Operators Manual. WRK of Oklahoma and WRK of Arkansas.
7. Yates, W. E., N. B. Akesson, and R. W. Cowden. 1976. Criteria for minimizing drift residues on crops downwind from aerial applications. Transactions of the ASAE 17(4): 627-632.