Measurement and evaluation of energy efficiency programs: California and South Korea

Energy

Volumn 31, Issue 6-7, 2006, Pages 1100-1113

  Vine, E ^a   Rhee, C H ^b   Lee, K D ^b  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b Korea Electrotechnology Research Institute (KERI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INVESTMENTS; MARKETING; PUBLIC POLICY; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

ELECTRIC UTILITY RESTRUCTURING; REGULATORY POLICY; STAKEHOLDERS;

ELECTRICITY;

ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ELECTRICITY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; INVESTMENTS; MARKETING; PUBLIC POLICY; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

ELECTRICITY INDUSTRY; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; REFORM PROCESS;

ASIA; CALIFORNIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; KOREA; NORTH AMERICA; SOUTH KOREA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 30944449618     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. California Public Utilities Commission Protocols and procedures for the verification of costs, benefits, and shareholder earnings from demand-side management programs 1998 California Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA Web site: www.calmac.org
2. J. Eto, R. Prahl, and J. Schlegel Scoping study on energy efficiency market transformation by California utility demand-side management programs Report LBNL-39058 1996 Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA Web site: www.calmac.org
3. J. Schlegel, M. Goldberg, J. Raab, R. Prahl, M. Kneipp, and D. Violette Evaluating energy efficiency programs in a re-structured industry environment: a handbook for the PUC staff 1997 National Association of Regulatory Commissioners Washington, DC
4. Keating K, Goldstein D, Eckman T, Miller P. Wheat, chaff, and conflicting definitions in market transformation. In: Proceedings of the 1997 summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, vol. 7. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, 1998, p. 157-169.
5. F. Sebold, A. Fields, L. Skumatz, S. Feldman, M. Goldberg, K. Keating, and J. Peters A framework for planning and assessing publicly funded energy efficiency 2001 Pacific Gas and Electric Company San Francisco, CA Web site: www.calmac.org
6. Kushler M, York D. State public benefits policies for energy efficiency: what have we learned? In: Proceedings of the 2004 summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, vol. 5. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, 2004, p. 156-167.
7. M. Kushler, and E. Vine Examining California's energy efficiency policy response to the 2000/2001 electricity crisis: practical lessons learned regarding policies, administration, and implementation 2003 American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy Washington, DC
8. California Energy Commission Emergency conservation and supply response 2001 Report P700-01-005F 2001 California Energy Commission Sacramento, CA
9. M. Kushler, E. Vine, and D. York Using energy efficiency to help address electric system reliability: an initial examination of 2001 experience Energy 28 4 2003 303 317
10. California Public Utilities Commission Interim opinion adopting energy efficiency policy rules (Decision 01-11-066), Nov. 29, 2001 2001 California Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA Web site: www.cpuc.org
11. California Public Utilities Commission Energy efficiency policy manual (Decision 01-11-066) 2001 California public utilities commission San Francisco, CA Web site: www.cpuc.org
12. US Department of Energy International performance measurement and verification protocol 2000 US Department of Energy Washington, DC Web site: www.ipmvp.org
13. California Public Utilities Commission Decision 02-10-062. Interim opinion, Oct 24, 2002 2002 California Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA Web site: www.cpuc.org
14. California Public Utilities Commission California energy commission, and consumer power and conservation financing authority. Energy action plan 2003 California Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA Web site: www.cpuc.org
15. TecMarket Works Framework Team The California evaluation framework 2004 California Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA Web site: www.calmac.org/calmac-filings.asp
16. Brown M, Megdal L, Jacobs P, Hall N, Roth, J. The California evaluation framework: moving evaluation into a systems approach for planning and conducting energy program evaluations. In: Proceedings of the 2004 summer study on energy efficiency in buildings, Pacific Grove, CA, vol. 5. Washington, DC: American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, 2004, p. 46-56.
17. Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc A forecast of cost effectiveness avoided costs and externality adders 2004 California Public Utilities Commission San Francisco, CA Web site: www.cpuc.org
18. H.-J. Chan New horizons for Korean energy industry - shifting paradigms and challenges ahead Energy 31 2003 1073 1084