Convergence of telecommunications, media and information technology, and implications for regulation

Info

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 42-56

  Shin, Dong Hee ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Communication technologies; Competitive strategy; South Korea; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MEDIA INDUSTRY; REGULATORY APPROACH; TELECOMMUNICATION;

EID: 30944447720     PISSN: 14636697     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/14636690610643276     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Arino, M. (2004), "Competition law and pluralism in European digital broadcasting; addressing the gaps", Communications and Strategies, Vol. 54, 2nd Quarter.
2. Association of Communication Services Providers (2003), Draft Communications Bill of Ofcom, submission to the DTI/DCMS Bill Team, Association of Communication Services Providers, London, July.
3. Bang, S.H. (2004), "A study on convergence of broadcasting and telecommunications: Focusing on regulatory realignment", Broadcasting Studies, Summer, pp. 33-56.
4. Bauer, J. (2004), "Harnessing the swarm", Communications & Strategies, Vol. 54, 2nd Quarter, p. 19.
5. Cannon, R. (2003), "The Legacy of the Federal Communications Commission's computer inquiries", Federal Communication Law Journal, Vol. 55, March.
6. Choi, H.-C. (2000), "Digital broadcasting and public interest", Broadcasting Research, Winter.
7. European Commission (2003), Commission Directive 2003/66/EC of 3 July 2003, European Commission, Brussels.
8. Federal Communications Commission (2004), Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Matter of IP-enabled Services, WC Docker No. 04-36, Federal Communications Commission, Washington, DC.
9. Fowler, M.S. and Brenner, D.L. (1982), "A marketplace approach to broadcast regulation", Texas Law Review, Vol. 60 No. 2, pp. 207-57.
10. Frieden, R. (2004), "Adjusting the horizontal and vertical in telecommunications regulation: A comparison of the traditional and a new layered approach", Federal Communication Law Journal, Vol. 55 No. 207, p. 209.
11. International Training Centre (ITC) (20030, Technology Policy in the Convergence Era, Minister for Development Cooperation of The Netherlands and Twente University, Twente, available at: Www.itc.nl/alumni/ itcnews2003.asp.
12. Kim, E. (2004), Rethinking Public Interest in Digital Broadcasting: A Review of Policy Discourse in Korea, Report, KISDI, Seoul.
13. Kim, G. (2003), General Trends in the Korean Press 2003, Summary of Overall Issues of Media in Korea, Korea Press Foundations, Seoul.
14. Kim, W. (2004), Public Interest in Digital Era, research report, Korea Broadcasting Institute, Seoul.
15. Korea Press Foundation (2005), The Debate over Public Interest and Competition in the Convergence Environment, Korea Press Foundation Research Publication Series, Korea Press Foundation, Seoul, available at: Www.kbi.kr/research/report/2004.html.
16. Krasnow, E.G. and Goodman, J.N. (19980, "The 'public interest' standard: The search for the Holy Grail", Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 50 No. 3, pp. 606-36.
17. Lee, W., Kang, M. and Eun, H. (2004), Public Interest in Digital Broadcasting, research report, Korea Broadcasting Institute, Seoul.
18. Lowe, P. (2004), "Media concentration and convergence: Competition in communications", Proceedings of Oxford Media Convention, January 13, 2004, Oxford.
19. McKnight, L. (2004), "The end of universal service", paper presented at 15th Telecom Research Policy Conference, Washington, DC, October.
20. McTaggert, C. (2002), "A layered approach to internet legal analysis", 21 December, available at: Www.innovationlaw.org/cm/ ilg2002/reading/layered1.pdf.
21. Marsden, C.T. (2000), "Not so special? Merging media pluralism with competition and industrial policy", info, Vol. 2 No. 1, pp. 5-13.
22. Meyer, J., Wilson, R.W., Baughcum, M.A., Burton, E. and Cauouette, L. (1982), The Economics of Competition in the Telecommunications Industry, Oelgeschlager, Gun and Hain, Cambridge, MA.
23. Motta, M. and Polo, M. (1997), "Concentration and public policies in the broadcasting industry: The future of television", Economic Policy, No. 25, pp. 295-334.
24. Mueller, M. (1999), "Digital convergence and its consequences", JAVNOST: The Public, Vol. 6 No. 3, special issue on The Economics and Politics of the New Media.
25. Napoli, P. (2001), Foundations of Communications Policy - Principles and Process in the Regulation of Electronic Media, Hampton, Cresskill, NJ.
26. New Millennium Research Council (2004), MCI Telecom Regulation Overhaul Proposal Is Fatally Flawed, Does not Address Challenges Facing Industry, New Millennium Research Council, Washington, DC, July 13.
27. Noam, E. (2003), "Will internet TV be American?", Trends in Communication, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 101-10.
28. Odlyzko, A.M. (2004), Layer Architectures and Regulation in Telecommunications, Free Rider: Deficiencies of the MCI_Layers_Policy Model and the Need for Principles that Encourage Competition in the New IP World, New Millennnium Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 16-19.
29. Office of Communications (Ofcom) (2004a), "Ofcom guidance for the public interest test for media mergers", available at: www.ofcom.org.uk/codes_guidelines/broadcasting/media_mergers/?a=87101.
30. Office of Communications (Ofcom) (2004b), "Ofcom broadcasting code", available at: Www.ofcom.org.uk/tv/ifi/codes/bcode/ ofcom-broadcasting-code.pdf.
31. Official Journal of the European Communities (2002), "2002 Framework Directive", Vol. 45, April 24.
32. Owen, B.M. and Wildman, S.S. (1992), Video Economics, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
33. Prosser, T. (2003), "[GB] new Communications Act becomes law", IRIS 2003-8H10, available at: http://merlin.obs.coe.int/iris/2003/8/ article21.en.html (accessed 25 May 2005).
34. Sicker, D. (2002), "Further defining a layered model for telecommunications policy", paper presented at the Telecommunication Policy Research Conference, September.
35. Varney, E. (2004), "Regulating the infrastructure in digital television within the UK context", paper presented at the 15th International Telecom Society Biennial Conference, Berlin, September.
36. Werback, K.D. (2001), "A layered model for internet policy", Journal on Telecommunications and High-tech Law, Vol. 37 No. 1.
37. Whitt, R.S. (2004a), "A horizontal leap forward", WC Docket No. 04-36, MCI policy paper, MCI, Washington, DC.
38. Whitt, R.S. (2004b), "A horizontal leap forward: Formulating a new communications public policy framework based on the network layers mode", Federal Communications Law Journal, Vol. 56 No. 3.
39. Wu, T. (2003), "Network neutrality, broadband discrimination", Journal of Telecommunications and High Technology Law, No. 141.