Posterolateral, anterior, or circumferential fusion in situ for high-grade spondylolisthesis in young patients: A long-term evaluation using the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire

Spine

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 190-196

  Helenius, Ilkka ^a,b,d   Lamberg, Tommi ^a   Österman, Kalevi ^a   Schlenzka, Dietrich ^a   Yrjönen, Timo ^a   Tervahartiala, Pekka ^a   Seitsalo, Seppo ^a   Poussa, Mikko ^a   Remes, Ville ^a,c  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c Surgical Hospital   (Finland)

^d NONE   (Finland)

Author keywords

High grade spondylolisthesis; in situ fusion; ODI; Patient outcome; Radiographic outcome; Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ANTERIOR SPINE FUSION; ARTICLE; CHILD; CIRCUMFERENTIAL SPINAL FUSION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KYPHOSIS; LUMBOSACRAL SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL EXAMINATION; POSTEROLATERAL SPINAL FUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SPINE FUSION; SPINE RADIOGRAPHY; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; FINLAND; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SACRUM; SCOLIOSIS; SOCIETIES, MEDICAL; SPINAL FUSION; SPONDYLOLISTHESIS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 30944441453     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000194843.94071.09     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Lenke LG. Bridwell KH. Evaluation and surgical treatment of high-grade isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. Instr Course Lect 2003;52:525-32.
2. Frennered AK, Danielson BI, Nachemson AL, et al. Midterm follow-up of young patients fused in situ for spondylolisthesis. Spine 1991;16:409-16.
3. Seitsalo S, Österman K, Hyvärinen H, et al. Severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. A long-term review of fusion in situ. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:259-65.
4. Möller H, Hedlund R. Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis. A prospective randomized study: Part 1. Spine 2000;25:1711-5.
5. Möller H, Hedlund R. Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis. Spine 2000;25:1716-21.
6. Sijbrandij S. A new technique for the reduction and stabilisation of severe spondylolisthesis. A report of two cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1981;63:266-71.
7. Matthiass HH. Heine J. The surgical reduction of spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 1986;203:34-44.
8. Dick WT, Schnebel B. Severe spondylolisthesis. Reduction and internal fixation. Clin Orthop 1988;232:70-9.
9. Tiusanen H, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, et al. Results of a trial of anterior or circumferential lumbar fusion in the treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. J Pediatr Orthop 1996;5:190-4.
10. Fairbank JCT, Couper J, Davies JB, et al. The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 1980;66:271-3.
11. Roland M, Morris R. A study of the natural history of back pain. 1. Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983;8:145-50.
12. D'Andrea L, Betz RR, Lenke LG, et al. Do radiographic parameters correlate with clinical outcomes in adolescents idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 2000;25:1795-802.
13. Haher TR, Gorup JM, Shin TM. Results of the Scoliosis Research Society Instrument for evaluation of surgical outcome in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. A multicenter study of 244 patients. Spine 1999;24:1435-40.
14. Merola A, Haher T, Brkaric M, et al. A multicenter study of the outcomes of the surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the scoliosis research society outcome instrument. Spine 2002;27:2046-51.
15. Lawlis GF, Cuencas R, Selby D. The development of the Dallas Pain Questionnaire. An assessment of the impact of spinal pain on behaviour. Spine 1989;14:511-6.
16. Garrat AM, Ruta DA, Abdalla MI, et al. The SF 36 health survey questionnaire: An outcome measure suitable for routine use within the NHS. BMJ 1993;306:1440-4.
17. Sintonen H, Pekurinen M. A fifteen-dimensional measure of health-related quality of life and its applications. In: Walker S, Rosser R, eds. Quality of Life Assessment: Key Issues in the 1990s. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1993:185-95.
18. Brooks R. EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy 1996;37:53-72.
19. Osborne RH, Hawthorne G, Lew EA, et al. Quality of life assessment in the community-dwelling elderly: validation of the Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL) Instrument and comparison with the SF-36. J Clin Epidemiol 2003;56:138-47.
20. Debnath UK, Freeman BJC, Gregory P, et al. Clinical outcome and return to sport after surgical treatment of spondylolysis in young athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2003;85:244-9.
21. Helenius I, Lamberg T, Österman K, et al. Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Instrument in evaluation of long-term surgical results in spondylolysis and low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients. Spine 2005;30:336-41.
22. Wiltse LL, Winter RB. Terminology and measurements of spondylolisthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1983;65:768-72.
23. Poussa M, Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, et al. Surgical treatment of severe isthmic spondylolisthesis in adolescents. Reduction or fusion in situ. Spine 1993;18:894-901.
24. Laurent LE, Einola S. Spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop Scand 1961;31:45-64.
25. Cobb JR. Outline for the study of scoliosis. In: Arbor A, Edwards JW, eds. Instructional Course Lectures. Park Ridge IL: The American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons; 1948;5:261-75.
26. Seitsalo S, Österman K, Hyvärinen H, et al. Progression of spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents. A long-term follow-up of 272 patients. Spine 1991;16:417-21.
27. Seitsalo S. Operative and conservative treatment of moderate spondylolisthesis in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72:908-13.
28. Laurent LE, Österman K. Operative treatment of spondylolisthesis in young patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976;117:85-91.
29. Wiltse LL, Hutchinson RH. Surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis. Clin Orthop 1964;35:116-35.
30. Laurent LE. Spondylolisthesis a study of 53 cases treated by spine fusion and 32 cases treated by laminectomy. Acta Orthop Scand 1958;27(suppl 35):1-457.
31. Schlenzka D, Seitsalo S, Poussa M, et al. Operative treatment of symptomatic lumbar spondylolysis and mild isthmic spondylolisthesis in young patients: A direct repair of the defect or segmental spinal fusion. Eur Spine J 1993;2:104-12.
32. Thomsen K, Christiansen FB, Eiskjaer SP, et al. Volvo award winner in clinical studies. The effect of pedicle screw instrumentation on functional outcome and fusion rates in posterolateral lumbar spine fusion: a prospective, randomised clinical study. Spine 1997;22:2813-22.
33. Gerchen PM, Dahl B, Katonis P, et al. No difference in clinical outcome after posterolateral lumbar fusion between patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and those with degenerative disc disease using pedicle screw instrumentation: A comparative study of 112 patients with 4 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 2002;11:423-7.
34. Molinari RW, Bridwell K, Lenke LG, et al. Complications in the surgical treatment of pediatric high-grade, isthmic dysplastic spondylolisthesis. A comparison of three surgical approaches. Spine 1999;24:1701-11.
35. Lonstein J. Spondylolisthesis in children: Cause, natural history, and management. Spine 1999;24:2640-8.
36. Muschik M, Zippel H, Perka C. Surgical management of severe spondylolisthesis in children and adolescents: Anterior fusion in situ versus anterior spondylodesis with posterior transpedicular instrumentation and reduction. Spine 1997;22:2036-42.
37. Poussa M, Remes V, Lamberg T, et al. Severe spondylolisthesis in adolescence: treatment by reduction or fusion in situ-long term clinical, radiologic, and functional outcome. Spine In press.