Performance of the Colson MAM BP 3AA1-2 automatic blood pressure monitor according to the European Society of Hypertension validation protocol;Validação de aparelho de medição automática da pressão arterial Colson MAM BP3AA1-2 segundo o protocolo da Sociedade Europeia de Hipertensão

Revista Portuguesa de Cardiologia

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 1341-1351

  Pereira, Telmo ^b   Maldonado, João ^a  

^a Instituto de Investigacao e Formacao Cardiovascular Quinta da Portela   (Portugal)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Arterial hypertension; Arterial stiffness; Blood pressure; Self measurement; Validation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; AGED; ARM CIRCUMFERENCE; ARTERIAL STIFFNESS; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; BLOOD VESSEL PARAMETERS; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; FEMALE; GENDER; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MONITOR; ORGAN INJURY; OSCILLOMETRY; PERFORMANCE; PULSE WAVE; QUALITY CONTROL; SELF EXAMINATION; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORS; CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 30944438031     PISSN: 08702551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Asmar R, Maldonado J. Medição da Pressão Arterial. Edições Delta 1997.
2. Asmar R, Maldonado J. Medição ambulatória da pressão arterial na prática clínica. Edições Delta. 1996.
3. Council Directive of 20 December 1979 on the approximation of the laws of the Member States relating to units of measurement and on the repeal of Directive 71/354/EEC. Official Journal of the European Communities no. L39.15.2;1980:42.
4. Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation. American National Standard: electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington, VA: AAMI;1987.
5. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, et al. The British Hypertension Society protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993;11(suppl 2):S43-S63.
6. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Staessen J, et al. European Society of Hypertension International protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002;7:3-17.
7. Mancia G, Zanchetti A, Agabiti-Rosei et al. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring is superior to clinic blood pressure in predicting treatment-induced regression of left ventricular hypertrophy. Circulation 1997;95:1464-70.
8. Mancia G, Omboni S, Parati G. The importance of blood pressure variability in hypertension. Blood Press Monit 2000; 5(suppl. 1):9-15.
9. Staessen JA, Asmar R, De Buyzere M, et al. Task Force II: Blood pressure measurement and cardiovascular outcome. Blood Press Monit 2001;6(6):355-70.
10. Verdecchia P. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure - current evidence and clinical implications. Hypertens 2000;35:844-51.
11. Imai Y, Ohkubo T, Tsuji I et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory and home blood pressure measurements in comparison to screening blood pressure measurements: a pilot study in Ohasama. Blood Press Monit 1996;1(suppl 2):S51-S58.
12. Ohkubo T, Imai Y, Tsuji I et al. Home blood pressure measurement has a stronger predictive power for mortality than does screening blood pressure: a population-based observation in Ohasama. J Hypertens 1998;16:971-97.
13. Pickering T., for an American Society of Hypertension ad hoc panel: Recommendations for the use of home (self) and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Am J Hypertens 1995; 9:1-11.
14. Asmar R, Zanchetti A. On behalf of the Organizing Committee and participants. Guidelines for the use of self-blood pressure monitoring: a summary report of the first international consensus conference. J Hypertens 2000;18:493-508.
15. Soghikian K, Casper SM, Fireman BH, et al. Home blood pressure monitoring. Effect on use of medical services and medical care costs. Med Care 1992;30:855-65.
16. O'Brien E. Criteria for validation of devices. Blood Press Monit 1999;4:279-293.
17. O'Brien E, Atkins N. A comparison of the BHS and AAMI protocols for validating blood pressure measuring devices: can the two be reconciled? J Hypertens 1994; 12:1089-1094.
18. Blacher J, Guerin AP, Pannier B, et al. Impact of aortic stiffness on survival in end-stage renal disease. Circulation 1999;99(18):2434-9.
19. Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Asmar R, et al. Aortic stiffness is an independent predictor of all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertens 2001;37(5): 1236-41.
20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;I:307-310.
21. National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The seventh report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, and treatment of high blood pressure. May, 2003.
22. Anonymous. Self-measurement of blood pressure: a statement by the World Hypertension League. J Hypertens 1988; 6:257-261.
23. 1999 World Health Organization/International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the Management of Hypertension. Guidelines Subcommittee. J Hypertens 1999;17:151-183.
24. Mengden T, Hernandez RM, Beltran B et al. Reliability of reporting self-measured blood pressure values by hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 1998;11:1413-17.
25. Van Popele NM, Bos WJW, de Beer NAM, et al. Arterial stiffness as underlying mechanism of disagreement between an oscillometric blood pressure monitor and a sphygmomanometer. Hypertension 2001;6:484-488.