A causal model for the effectiveness of internal quality assurance for the health science area

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 88, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 1419-1425

  Seeorn, Kittiya ^a  

^a Naval Nursing College   (Thailand)

Author keywords

Causal model; Effectiveness; Health science; Internal quality assurance

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CAUSAL MODELING; CLINICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER PREDICTION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DECENTRALIZATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; JOB SATISFACTION; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MEDICAL STAFF; RANDOM SAMPLE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURED QUESTIONNAIRE; TEAMWORK;

HEALTH FACILITIES; HUMANS; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROGRAM EVALUATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; THAILAND;

EID: 30844469312     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: 01252208     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ajzen I. Attitudes, Personality and behavior. Chicago: The Dorsey Press, 1998.
2. Briggs KL, Wohlstetter P. Key elements of successful school-based management strategy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2003; 14: 351-72.
3. Cheng Y. School effectiveness and school-based management: a mechanism for development. London: The Falmer Press, 1996.
4. Gilbert C. Managing the effective school. In: Preedy M, ed. Local management of school: an introductory summary. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd., 1993.
5. Guo CJ. Key factors for a quality balance between national and local curricula. Bangkok, Thailand: Proceeding from the second international forum on education reform: key factors in effective implementation 2-5 September, 2002: 12-21.
6. Harrison J, Kuint S. School culture and school effectiveness in emergencies: lesson from Israeli experience during Golf War. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 1998; 9: 192-217.
7. Jongseuppant CH, Tongnopneu N, Kulsukrungsant P. Research report: QA performance evaluation in higher education institute jurisdiction to University Affair. Bangkok: Research Center and Service, Srinakarintaraviroj University Press, 2002.
8. Kennedy J. Managing the effective school. In: Preedy M, ed. Interfacing finance. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd., 1993.
9. Laksana S. Quality assurrance guidelnes. Teacher Bulletin. 1998; 18: 2-7.
10. Mohd YS, Aspinwall EM. Critical success factors in small and medium enterprises: survey results. Quality Assurance in Education 2000; 11: 448-62.
11. Nakorntap A. Research report: QA issue. Bangkok: T T Print, Limited, 2000.
12. Pitiyanuwatana S. Solution to the QA problems. ONESQA Bulletin 2003; 12: 2-3.
13. Simkins T, Sisum C, Memon M. Exploring the headteacher's role. School Effectiveness and School Improvement 2003; 14: 275-91.
14. Sirichana W. The development of quality assurance model for higher education institutions under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of University Affairs. Degree of Doctor in Higher Education, Department of Higher Education, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, 1994.
15. Suvejwattanakul R. A development of the quality assu-rance performance model for higher education in faculty of education under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of University Affairs. Degree of Master in Educational Research, Department of Educational Research, Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, 2000.
16. The Office of Educational Reform, Thailand. Educational administration by Location: for Educational Quality. Bangkok: Pappim Co.Ltd., 2002.