Leaching behavior of green sands from gray-iron foundries used for reactive barrier applications

Environmental Engineering Science

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 156-170

  Lee, Taeyoon ^a   Benson, Craig H ^b  

^a Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology   (South Korea)

^b University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

Author keywords

Beneficial use; Gray iron foundries; Green sand; Leaching; Metals; Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons; Reactive barriers; Sustainability; Water leach tests

Indexed keywords

AQUIFERS; BYPRODUCTS; GROUNDWATER; IRON; LEACHING; METALS; POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS;

BENEFICIAL USE; GRAY-IRON FOUNDRIES; GREEN SAND; REACTIVE BARRIERS; SUSTAINABILITY; WATER LEACH TESTS (WLT);

FOUNDRY SAND;

ANTIMONY; ARSENIC; CADMIUM; FLUORINE; IRON; LEAD; MANGANESE;

AQUIFER; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ELEMENTAL ANALYSIS; FOUNDRY; LEACHING; MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE DOSE; SAND; UNITED STATES; WATER ANALYSIS; WATER CONTAMINATION; WATER LEACH TEST; WATER TABLE;

EID: 30844462816     PISSN: 10928758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/ees.2006.23.156     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. ASTM. (2004). Annual Book of Standards, Vol. 11. West Conshohocken, PA: ASTM International.
2. BAILEY, S., OLIN, T., BRICKA, M., and ADRIAN, D. (1999). A review of potentially low-cost sorbents for heavy metals. Water Res. 33(11), 2469-2479.
3. BASTIAN, K., and ALLEMAN, J. (1998). Microtox™ characterization of foundry sand residuals. Waste Manage. 18, 227-234.
4. CZURDA, K., and HAUS, R. (2002). Reactive barriers with fly ash zeolites for in situ groundwater remediation. Appl. Clay Sci. 21, 13-20.
5. EYKHOLT, G., and SIVAVEC, T. (1995). In D. Daniel and Y. Acar, Eds., Contaminant Transport Issues for Reactive Permeable Barriers, Geoenvironment 2000: Characterization, Containment, Remediation, and Performance in Environmental Geotechnics, New York: ASCE, pp. 1608-1621.
6. GAVASKAR, A., GUPTA, N., SASS, B., JANOSY, R., and O'SULLIVAN, D. (1998). Permeable Barriers for Groundwater Remediation: Design Construction, and Monitoring. Columbus, OH: Battelle Press.
7. GILLHAM, R., and O'HANNESIN, S. (1994). Enhanced degradation of halogenated aliphatics by zero-valent Iron. Ground Water 32(6), 958-967.
8. HAM, R., BOYLE, W., and KUNES, T. (1981). Leachability of foundry process solid wastes, J. Environ. Eng. 107(1), 155-170.
9. HAM, R., BOYLE, W., TRAEGER, P., WELLANDER, D., and LOVEJOY, M. (1990). Laboratory evaluation of selected ferrous foundry solid wastes for use in highway construction. Proc. XIII Annual Madison Waste Conference. Madison, WI: Dept. of Eng. Prof. Development, University of Wisconsin-Madison, pp. 218-248.
10. HAM, R., BOYLE, W., ENGROFF, E., and FERO, R. (1993). Organic compounds in ferrous foundry process waste leachates, J. Environ. Eng. 119(1), 34-55.
11. JAVED, S., and LOVELL, C. (1994). Use of Waste Foundry Sand in Highway Construction, Report No. JHRP/INDOT/FHWA-94/2J. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue School of Engineering.
12. KIILERICH, O., LARSEN, J., and NIELSEN, C. (2000). Field results from the use of a permeable reactive wall, 2nd International Conference on Remediation of Chlorinated and Recalcitrant Compounds, Monterey, CA, May 22-25.
13. rd Industrial Waste Conference, May 10-12, 1988, West Lafayette, IN, pp. 605-616.
14. LEE, T., and BENSON, C. (2002). Using Foundry Sands as Reactive Media in Permeable Reactive Barriers, Geo Engineering Report 02-01. Madison, WI: Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
15. LEE, T., and BENSON, C. (2004). Using waste green sands for treating alachlor and metolachlor in groundwater. J. Environ. Qual. 33(5), 1682-1693.
16. LEE, T., BENSON, C., and EYKHOLT, G. (2004). Waste green sands as a reactive media for groundwater contaminated with trichloroethylene. J. Hazard. Mater. B109, 25-36.
17. MAYER, K., BLOWES, D., and FRIND, E. (2001). Reactive transport modeling of an in situ reactive barrier for the treatment of hexavalent chromium and trichloroethylene in groundwater. Water Resour. Res. 37(12), 3091-3103.
18. MCMAHON, P., DENNEHY, K., and SANDSTROM, M. (1999). Hydraulic and geochemical performance of a permeable reactive barrier containing zero-valent iron, Denver Federal Center. Ground Water 37(3), 396-404.
19. MROUEH, U., and WAHLSTRÖM, M. (2002). By-products and recycled materials in earth construction in Finland-An assessment of applicability. Resources, Conservat. Recycl. 35, 117-129.
20. NAFTZ, D., MORRISON, S., DAVIS, J., and FULLER, C. (2002). Handbook of Groundwater Remediation Using Permeable Reactive Barriers. New York: Academic Press.
21. NELSON, D., and SOMMERS, L. (1982). Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter. In R. Miller and D. Keeney, Eds., Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2. Chemical and Microbiological Properties, Page A, Madison WI: Soil Science Society of America, pp. 539-579.
22. O'HANNESIN, S., and GILLHAM, R. (1998). Long-term performance of an in situ 'iron wall' for remediation of VOCs. Ground Water 36(1), 164-170.
23. PAULSON, A. (1999). Modeling removal of Cd, Cu, Pb, and Zn in acidic groundwater during neutralization by ambient surface waters and groundwater. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33(21), 3850-3856.
24. PULS, R., BLOWES, D., and GILLHAM, R. (1999). Long-term performance monitoring for a permeable reactive barrier at the U.S. Coast Guard Support Center, Elizabeth City, North Carolina. J. Hazard. Mater. 68, 109-124.
25. REDDI, L., RIECK, G., SCHWAB, A., CHOU, S., and FAN, L. (1996). Stabilization of phenolics in foundry waste using cementitious materials. J. Hazard. Mater. 45, 89-106.
26. 2+ by adsorption onto fly ash and fly ash/lime mixing. Water Sci. Technol. 39(10-11), 239-247.
27. ROBERTS, A., TOTTEN, L., ARNOLD, W., BURRIS, D., and CAMPBELL, T. (1996). Reductive elimination of chlorinated ethylenes by zero-valent metals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 30(8), 2654-2659.
28. U.S. EPA (1998). Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, SW-846. Washington, DC: United States Environmental Protection Agency.
29. VAN GENUCHTEN, M.TH. (1981). Analytical solutions for chemical transport with simultaneous adsorption, zero-order production, and first-order decay. J. Hydrol. 49, 213.
30. WARNER, S., and SOREL, D. (2003). Ten years of permeable reactive barriers: Lessons learned and future expectations. In S. Henry and S. Warner, Eds., Chlorinated Solvent and DNAPL Remediation, Innovative Strategies for Subsurface Cleanup. Washington, DC: American Chemical Society, pp. 36-50.
31. WILKEN, R., and PULS, R. (2003). Capstone Report on the Application, Monitoring, and Performance of Permeable Reactive Barriers for Ground-Water Remediation, Volume 1, Performance Evaluations at Two Sites. Report No. EPA/600/R-03/045a. Cincinnati, OH: National Risk Management Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
32. WILKENS, J., SHOEMAKER, S., BAZELA, W., EGLER, A., and BAIN, J. (2003). Arsenic removal from groundwater using a PRB of BOF slag at the Dupont East Chicago site. Proc. RTDF PRBs Action Team Meeting. Cincinnati, OH: U.S. EPA.
33. WISCONSIN. (2004). Wisconsin Administrative Code. Madison, WI: Revisor of Statutes Bureau.
34. YABUSAKI, S., CANTRELL, K., SASS, B., and STEEFEL, C. (2001). Multicomponent reactive transport in an in situ zero-valent iron cell. Environ. Sci. Technol. 35(7), 1493-1503.