Comparison of foot orthoses made by podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction in The Netherlands

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 6, Issue , 2005, Pages

  Guldemond, Nick A ^a   Leffers, Pieter ^b   Schaper, Nicolaas C ^a   Sanders, Antal P ^a   Nieman, Fred H M ^a   Walenkamp, Geert H I M ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSAULT; CASE REPORT; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOOT ORTHOSIS; FOOT SOLE; FOREFOOT; HALLUX; HUMAN; MALE; METATARSAL BONE; METATARSALGIA; PODIATRIST; PRESSURE; SCORING SYSTEM; TREADMILL EXERCISE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WALKING; EVALUATION; FOOT; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOSIS; PODIATRY; STANDARD;

ADULT; FEMALE; FOOT; HALLUX; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORTHOTIC DEVICES; PODIATRY; PRESSURE;

EID: 30844459695     PISSN: 14712474     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-6-61     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bardelli M, Turelli L, Scoccianti G: Definition and classification of metatarsalgia. J Foot Ankle Surg 2003, 9:79-85.
2. Poon C, Love B: Efficacy of foot orthosis for metatarsalgia. The Foot 1999.
3. Ivanic GM, Trnka HJ, Homann NC: [Post-traumatic metatarsalgia. Early results of treatment with a new insole]. Unfallchirurg 2000, 103:507-510.
4. Hodge MC, Bach TM, Carter GM: novel Award First Prize Paper. Orthotic management of plantar pressure and pain in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1999, 14:567-575.
5. Chang AH, Abu-Faraj ZU, Harris GF, Nery J, Shereff MJ: Multistep measurement of plantar pressure alterations using metatarsal pads. Foot Ankle Int 1994, 15:654-660.
6. Woodburn J, Barker S, Helliwell PS: A randomized controlled trial of foot orthoses in rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 2002, 29:1377-1383.
7. Novick A, Stone J, Birke JA, Brasseaux DM, Broussard JB, Hoard AS, Hawkins ES: Reduction of plantar pressure with the rigid relief orthosis. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1993, 83:115-122.
8. Bitzan P, Giurea A, Wanivenhaus A: Plantar pressure distribution after resection of the metatarsal heads in rheumatoid arthritis. Foot Ankle Int 1997, 18:391-397.
9. Jackson L, Binning J, Potter J: Plantar pressures in rheumatoid arthritis using prefabricated metatarsal padding. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2004, 94:239-245.
10. Kavlak Y, Uygur F, Korkmaz C, Bek N: Outcome of orthoses intervention in the rheumatoid foot. Foot Ankle Int 2003, 24:494-499.
11. Landorf K, Keenan AM, Rushworth RL: Foot orthosis prescription habits of Australian and New Zealand podiatric physicians. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2001, 91:174-183.
12. Boer H, Seydel ER: Medical opinions, beliefs and prescription of orthopaedic footwear: a survey of Dutch orthopaedists and rehabilitation practitioners. Clin Rehabil 1998, 12:245-253.
13. Morris C, Newdick H, Johnson A: Variations in the orthotic management of cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev 2002, 28:139-147.
14. Bakker JP, De Groot IJ, De Jong BA, Van Tol-De Jager MA, Lankhorst GJ: Prescription pattern for orthoses in The Netherlands: use and experience in the ambulatory phase of Duchenne muscular dystrophy. Disabil Rehabil 1997, 19:318-325.
15. Hopson MM, McPoil TG, Cornwall MW: Motion of the first metatarsophalangeal joint. Reliability and validity of four measurement techniques. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1995, 85:198-204.
16. Ball P, Johnson GR: Technique for the measurement of hindfoot inversion and eversion and its use to study a normal population. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 1996, 11:165-169.
17. Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL: Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Subtalar and ankle joint measurements. Phys Ther 1988, 68:672-677.
18. Buckley RE, Hunt DV: Reliability of clinical measurement of subtalar joint movement. Foot Ankle Int 1997, 18:229-232.
19. Menz HB, Tiedemann A, Kwan MM, Latt MD, Sherrington C, Lord SR: Reliability of clinical tests of foot and ankle characteristics in older people. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003, 93:380-387.
20. Thompson L, Nester C, Stuart L, Wiles P: Interclinician variation in diabetes foot assessment - a national lottery? Diabet Med 2005, 22(2):196-199.
21. Thompson L, Nester C, Stuart L, Wiles P: Interclinician variation in diabetes foot assessment - a national lottery? Diabet Med 2005, 22:196-199.
22. Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB: Rear foot inversion/eversion during gait relative to the subtalar joint neutral position. Foot Ankle Int 1996, 17:406-412.
23. Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB: Effect of patient position on the consistency of placing the rearfoot at subtalar neutral. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1997, 87:399-406.
24. Chuter V, Payne C, Miller K: Variability of neutral-position casting of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2003, 93:1-5.
25. Zuijderduin WM, Dekker J: Diagnoses and interventions in podiatry. Disability and Rehabilitation 1996, 18:27-34.
26. Kruizinga CP, Boonstra A, Groothoff JW, Elzinga A, Goeken NLH: Characteristics of patients supplied with foot orthoses from orthopaedic workshops in The Netherlands. The Foot 2003, 13:39-45.
27. Kernozek TW, LaMott EE, Dancisak MJ: Reliability of an in-shoe pressure measurement system during treadmill walking. Foot Ankle Int 1996, 17:204-209.
28. Boyd LA, Bontrager EL, Sara MS, Perry J: The reliability and validity of the Novel Pedar system of in-shoe pressure measurement duringfree ambulation. Gait & Posture 1997, 5:165.
29. Weijers RE, Walenkamp GHIM, Mameren van H, Kessels AG: The relationship of the position of the metatarsal heads and peak plantar pressure. Foot and Ankle Int 2003, 24:349-353.
30. Crick JE, Brennan RL: GENOVA: a GENeral purpose analysis Of VAriance system. version 2.2.1984.
31. Root ML: Development of the functional orthosis. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 1994, 11:183-210.
32. Bernard MA, Goldsmith H, Curnick KL, Jarret B: Prescription of custom foot orthoses practice guidelines. Ellicott City, MD 21043-4547, The American College Of Foot And Ankle Orthopedics & Medicine; 2002:32.
33. Price J: Clinical guidelines for orthotic therapy provided by podiatrists. 41 Derby Street, Collingwood Vic 3066 AUS, Australian Podiatry Council; 1998.
34. Lelièvre J, Lelièvre JF: Pathologie du Pied. 5ème ed. edition. Paris, Masson éditeur; 1981.
35. Martorell Martorell J: Nouvelle semelle pour métatarsalgie. Podologie 1968, 6:419.
36. Lavigne A, Noviel D: Nouvelles thérapeutiques en podologie. Paris, Morgan; 1973.
37. Lavigne A, Noviel D: Traite théorique et pratique de la semelle orthopédique. Boulogne, Scerdes; 1975.
38. Moraros J, Hodge W: Orthotic survey. Preliminary results. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1993, 83:139-148.
39. Root ML, Orien WP, Weed JH: Normal and abnormal function of the foot. Los Angeles CA., Clinical Biomechanics Corporation Publishers; 1977.
40. Armstrong DG, Liswood PJ, Todd WF: Potential risks of accommodative padding in the treatment of neuropathic ulcerations. Ostomy Wound Manage 1995, 41:44-6, 48-9.
41. Martin N, Oldani T, Claxton MJ: A Guide To Offloading The Diabetic Foot. Podiatry Today 2005, 18:67-74.
42. Guldemond NA, Leffers P, Sanders AP, Schaper NC, Walenkamp GHIM: Clinical proficiency of Dutch podiatrists, pedorthists and orthotists regarding plantar pressure reduction [Abstract], Novel EMED scientific meeting 2004, Leeds UK. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2005, 20:S14.
43. Pratt DJ: A critical review of the literature on foot orthoses. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2000, 90:339-341.
44. Spencer S: Pressure relieving intervention for preventing and treating diabetic foot ulcers (Cochrane Review). Oxford, The Cochrane Library; 2001:14.
45. Dahle LK, Michael MJ: Visual assessment of foot type and relationship of foot type to lower extremity injury. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy 1991, 14:70-74.
46. Cornwall MW, McPoil TG: Footwear and foot orthotic effectiveness research: a new approach. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 1995, 21:337-344.
47. Landorf KB, Keenan AM: Efficacy of foot orthoses: What does the literature tell us? J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2000, 90:149-158.
48. Pierrynowski MR, Smith SB, Mlynarczyk JH: Proficiency of foot care specialists to place the rearfoot at subtalar neutral. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1996, 86:217-223.
49. Payne CB: The past, present, and future of podiatric biomechanics. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 1998, 88:53-63.
50. Laughton C, McClay Davis I, Williams DS: A comparison of four methods of obtaining a negative impression of the foot. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 2002, 92:261-268.
51. Lee WE: Podiatric biomechanics. An historical appraisal and discussion of the Root model as a clinical system of approach in the present context of theoretical uncertainty. Clin Podiatr Med Surg 2001, 18:555-684; discussion 685-90, v.
52. Miller M, McGuire J: Literature reveals no consensus on subtalar neutral. Biomechanics 2000, 7:63-74.
53. Elveru RA, Rothstein JM, Lamb RL, Riddle DL: Methods for taking subtalar joint measurements. A clinical report. Phys Ther 1988, 68:678-682.