Some polite applause for the 2003 apa division 30 definition of hypnosis

American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis

Volumn 48, Issue 2-3, 2005, Pages 99-106

  Woody, Erik ^a   Sadler, Pamela ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b WILFRID LAURIER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATTENTION; AWARENESS; HALLUCINATION; HUMAN; HYPNOSIS; IMAGINATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; PERCEPTION; REVIEW;

HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMANS; HYPNOSIS; IMAGINATION; INDIVIDUALITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; RESEARCH; SOCIETIES, SCIENTIFIC; SUGGESTION; TERMINOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

EID: 30844457503     PISSN: 00029157     EISSN: 21600562     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2005.10401502     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Bowers, K.S. (1982, August). Suggestion and subtle control. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
2. Cantor, N. & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 38-48.
3. Cantor, N., Smith, E.E., French, R. de S., & Mezzich, J. (1980). Psychiatric diagnosis as prototype categorization. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, S9, 181-193.
4. Comey, G. & Kirsch, I. (1999). Intentional and spontaneous imagery in hypnosis: The phenomenology of hypnotic responding. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 47, 65-85.
5. Green, J. P., Barabasz, A. F., Bairett, D., & Montgomery, G.H. (2005). Forging ahead: The 2003 APA Division 30 definition of hypnosis. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 53, 259-264.
6. Hargadon, R., Bowers, K.S., & Woody, E.Z. (1995). Does counter-pain imagery mediate hypnotic analgesia? Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104, 508-516.
7. Nash, M.R. (in press). Scientism, vicious intellectualism, and the importance of being earnest when crafting scientific definitions. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis.
8. Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 217-227.
9. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive reference points. Cognitive Psychology, 7, 532-547.
10. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & D.B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Shor, R.E., & Ome, E.C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12. Simpson, J.A., & Weiner, E.S.C. (1989). The Oxford English dictionaiy. New Yoik: Oxford University Press.
13. Szechtman, H., Woody, E., Bowers, K.S., & Nahmias, C. (1998). Where the imaginai appears real: A PET study of auditory hallucinations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 95, 1956-1960.
14. Tellegen, A. (1978/1979). On measures and conceptions of hypnosis. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 21, 219-237.
15. Weitzenhoffer, A M. (1974). When is an “instruction” an instruction? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 22, 258-269.
16. Weitzenhoffer, A.M. (1980). Hypnotic susceptibility revisited. American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis, 22, 130-146.
17. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., & Hilgard, E.R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
18. Weitzenhoffer, A.M., & Hilgard, E.R. (1962). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale, Form C. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
19. Woody, E.Z., Bowers, K.S., & Oakman, J.M. (1992). A conceptual analysis of hypnotic responsiveness: Experience, individual differences, and context. In E. Fromm and M. Nash (Eds.), Contemporaiy hypnosis research (pp. 3-33). New York: Guilford.
20. Zamansky, H.S. (1977). Suggestion and countersuggestion in hypnotic behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, S6, 346-351.
21. Zamansky, H.S., & Clark, L.E. (1986). Cognitive competition and hypnotic behavior: Whither absorption? International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 34, 205-214.