The emergence, codification and diffusion of sport: Theoretical and conceptual issues

International Review for the Sociology of Sport

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 115-118

  Malcolm, Dominic ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30844452725     PISSN: 10126902     EISSN: 14617218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1012690205052173     Document Type: Review

References (9)

1. Bradley, J. (1990) 'The MCC, Society and Empire: A Portrait of Cricket's Ruling Body, 1860-1914', International Journal for the History of Sport (1).
2. Colls, R. (2002) The Identity of England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Dunning, E. (1992) 'Figurational Sociology and the Sociology of Sport: Some Concluding Remarks', in E. Dunning and C. Rojek (eds) Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process: Critique and Counter-Critique. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
4. Dunning, E., Malcolm, D. and Waddington, I. (eds) (2004) Sport Histories: Figurational Studies in the Development of Modern Sports. London: Routledge.
5. Elias, N. (1986) 'An Essay on Sport and Violence', in N. Elias and E. Dunning, Quest for Excitement. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
6. Malcolm, D. (2002) 'Cricket and Civilizing Processes: A Response to Stokvis', International Review for the Sociology of Sport 37(1): 37-57.
7. Malcolm, D. (2004) 'Cricket: Civilizing and De-Civilizing Processes in the Imperial Game', in E. Dunning, D. Malcolm and I. Waddington (eds) Sport Histories: Figurational Studies in the Development of Modern Sports. London: Routledge.
8. Sheard, K. (1997) 'Aspects of Boxing in the Western "Civilizing Process'". International Review for the Sociology of Sport 32(1): 31-57.
9. Stokvis, R. (1992) 'Sports and Civilization: Is Violence the Central Problem?', in E. Dunning, and C. Rojek (eds) Sport and Leisure in the Civilizing Process: Critique and Counter-Critique. Basingstoke: Macmillan.