Robotics in plastic and reconstructive surgery: Use of a telemanipulator slave robot to perform microvascular anastomoses

Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 53-57

  Katz, Ryan D ^a   Taylor, Jesse A ^a   Rosson, Gedge D ^a   Brown, Phillip R ^a   Singh, Navin K ^a  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Da Vinci; Microsurgery; Robot

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BLOOD VESSEL SHUNT; CAMERA; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEVICE; DOG; FEASIBILITY STUDY; NONHUMAN; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; SURGICAL MICROSCOPE; TELESURGERY;

EID: 30844448405     PISSN: 0743684X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-931908     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ballantyne G. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telemonitoring. Surge Endosc 2002;16:1389-1402
2. Stephenson E Jr, Sankholkar S. Robotically assisted microsurgery for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 1998;66:1064-1067
3. Bonatti J, Schachner T. Robotic totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass: program development and learning curve issues. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004;127:504-510
4. Tatooles A, Pappas P. Minimally invasive mitral valve repair using the da Vinci robotic system. Ann Thorac Surg 2004;77:1978-1982; discussion 1982-1984
5. Bentas W, Wolfram M. Robotic technology and the translation of open radical prostatectomy to laparoscopy: the early Frankfurt experience with robotic radical prostatectomy and one year follow-up. Eur Urol 2003;44:175-181
6. Horgan S, Vanuno D. Early experience with robotically assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2002;12:64-70
7. Horgan S, Vanuno D. Robots in laparoscopic surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2001;11:415-419
8. Ayav A, Bresler L. Early results of one-year robotic surgery using the da Vinci system to perform advanced laparoscopic procedures. J Gastrointest Surg 2004;8:720-726
9. Khouri R, Cooley B. A prospective study of microvascular free-flap surgery and outcome. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998;102:711-721
10. Kelly J, Eadie P. Prospective evaluation of outcome measures in free-flap surgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2004;20:435-438
11. Siemionow M, Oxer K. Robotic assistance in microsurgery. J Reconstr Microsurg 2000;16:643-649
12. Le Roux P, Das H. Robot-assisted microsurgery: a feasibility study in the rat. Neurosurgery 2001;48:584-589
13. Hanly E, Marohn M. Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the da Vinci surgical system. Am J Surg 2004;187:309-315
14. Yohannes P, Rotariu P. Comparison of robotic versus laparoscopic skills: is there a difference in the learning curve?. Urology 2002;60:39-45; discussion 45
15. Cadiere GB, Himpens J. Feasibility of robotic laparoscopic surgery: 146 cases. World J Surg 2001;25:1467-1477
16. Talamini M, Chapman S. A prospective analysis of 211 robotic-assisted surgical procedures. Surg Endosc 2003;17:1521-1524; Epub 2003 Aug 15
17. Brett P, Ma X. The potential of robotic technology applied to meet requirements for tools to support microsurgery and cellular surgery. Cell Mol Biol 2004;50:275-280
18. Li R, Jensen J. Microvascular anastomoses performed in rats using a microsurgical telemanipulator. Computer Aided Surg 2000;5:326-332