Predicting release success of captive-reared loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus) using pre-release behavior

Zoo Biology

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 447-458

  Munkwitz, Nicole M ^a   Turner, Jennifer M ^a   Kershner, Eric L ^a,c   Farabaugh, Susan M ^b   Heath, Shane R ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR WILDLIFE STUDIES   (United States)

^b ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

Captive breeding; Endangered species; Pair compatibility; Shrikes; Soft release; Wild release

Indexed keywords

LANIIDAE; LANIUS LUDOVICIANUS; LANIUS LUDOVICIANUS MEARNSI;

EID: 30844445787     PISSN: 07333188     EISSN: 10982361     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20067     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Alford PL, Bloomsmith MA, Keeling ME, Beck TF. 1995. Wounding aggression during the formation and maintenance of captive, multi-male chimpanzee groups. Zoo Biol 14:347-59.
2. Baltz AP. 1998. The assessment of reproductive potential in Micronesian kingfisher pairs. Zoo Biol 17:425-32.
3. Blackford AV, Lynn S, Plissner JH, Warnock N. 2003. 2002 population monitoring of the San Clemente loggerhead shrike on NALF, San Clemente Island, California, U.S. Navy, Environmental Department, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 216 p plus electronic appendices.
4. Brent L, Kessel AL, Barrera H. 1997. Evaluation of introduction procedures in captive chimpanzees. Zoo Biol 16:335-42.
5. Brubaker DL, Lynn S, Schmidt GA, Garcelon DK. 2000. San Clemente loggerhead shrike release program - 1999, Final Report. U.S. Navy, Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 67p.
6. Curio E. 1996. Conservation needs ethology. Trends Ecol Evolut 11:260-3.
7. Farabaugh SM, Tornatore N, Harvey NC. 1999. 1999 Final report: 1999 behavioral studies on the captive population of San Clemente loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus mearnsi). DoD, U.S. Navy, Natural Resources Specialist Support Team, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California.
8. Farabaugh SM, Tornatore N, Littlefeather T, Whitman P, Harvey NC. 2002. Final Report: 2000 propagation and behavior of the captive population of the San Clemente loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus mearnsi). DoD, U.S. Navy, Natural Resources Specialist Support Team. Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California.
9. Flynn D, Harvey NC. 1998. Final Report: 1997 behavioral studies on the captive population of San Clemente Island loggerhead shrikes (Lanius ludovicianus mearnsi). DoD, U.S. Navy, Natural Resources Specialist Support Team, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California.
10. Gerencser J. 1997. Evaluation of pair-bond strength in cranes at the International Crane Foundation. Avicultural Magazine 103:107-11.
11. Grant TD, Lynch C. 2003. San Clemente logger-head shrike (Lanius ludovicianus mearnsi) population biology management plan: analysis and breeding recommendations. San Diego: Zoological Society of San Diego. 53p.
12. Greenhouse SW, Geisser S. 1959. On the methods in the analysis of profile data. Psychometrika 24:95-112.
13. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL. 1989. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76:297-307.
14. Kleiman DG, Stanley Price MR, Beck BB. 1994. Criteria for re-introductions. In: Olney PJ, Mace S, Feistner GM, Feistner ATC, editors. Creative conservations: interactive management of wild and captive animals. London: Chapman & Hall. p 228-303.
15. Nelson JT, Small CR, Ellis DH. 1995. Quantitative assessment of pair formation behavior in captive whooping cranes (Grus Americana). Zoo Biol 14:107-14.
16. Plissner J, Blackford AV, Carlisle H, Warnock N. 2002. 2001 population monitoring of the San Clemente loggerhead shrike on NALF, San Clemente Island, California, U.S. Navy, Environmental Department, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 283p.
17. Scott JM, Carpenter JW. 1987. Release of captive-reared or translocated endangered birds: what do we need to know? Auk 104:544-5.
18. Scott JM, Morrison ML. 1990. Natural history and management of the San Clemente logger-head shrike. Proc West Found Vertebrate Zool 4:23-7.
19. Thompson KV, Roberts M, Rail WF. 1995. Factors affecting pair compatibility in captive kangaroo rats Dipodomys heermanni. Zoo Biol 14:317-30.
20. Turner JM, Kershner EL, Struthers JL, Garcelon DK. 2002. San Clemente loggerhead shrike release program - 2001, final report. U.S. Navy, Natural Resources Management Branch, Southwest Division, Naval Facilities Engineering Command, San Diego, California. 83p.
21. U.S. Department of the Navy, Southwest Division. 2002. San Clemente Island integrated natural resources management plan, May 2002. San Diego, CA. Prepared by Tierra Data Systems. Escondido, CA.
22. Vedder JG, Howell DG. 1980. Topographic evolution of the southern California borderland during late Cenozoic time. In: Powers DM, editor. The California Channel Islands: proceedings of a multidisciplinary symposium. Santa Barbara. California: Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History. p 7-31.
23. Waugh DR, Romero GS. 2000. Behaviour of red-tailed amazons during free mate choice in a communal aviary at Loro Parque Fundacion, Puerto de la Cruz. Int Zoo Yearb 37:206-13.
24. Yosef R. 1996. Loggerhead shrike (Lanius ludovicianus). In: Poole A, Gill F, editors. The birds of North America, No. 231. Philadelphia: Academy of Natural Sciences and Washington DC: The American Ornithologists Union. 27p.