Habituation to treadmill walking

Bio-Medical Materials and Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 43-52

  Van De Putte, M ^a,c   Hagemeister, N ^a   St Onge, N ^a,d   Parent, G ^a   De Guise, J A ^a,b  

^a CENTRE HOSPITALIER DE L UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE DE TECHNOLOGIE SUPÉRIEURE   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^d Rehabilitation Institute of Montreal   (Canada)

Author keywords

Gait; Habituation; Spatio temporal parameters; Three dimensional kinematics; Treadmill

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; GAIT ANALYSIS; KINEMATICS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; WALKING AIDS;

GAIT; HABITUATION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS;

EXERCISE EQUIPMENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GAIT; HABITUATION; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; KINEMATICS; KNEE; MALE; MEASUREMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PARAMETER; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECORDING; REPRODUCIBILITY; STEADY STATE; TREADMILL; VELOCITY; WALKING;

EID: 30844441434     PISSN: 09592989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. R.M. Alexander and A.S. Jayes, A dynamic similarity for the gaits of quadrupedal mammals, J. Zool. 201 (1983), 135-152.
2. F. Alton, L. Baldey, S. Caplan and M.C. Morrissey, A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill walking, Clinical Biomechanics 13 (1998), 434-440.
3. W.L. Boda, W. Tapp and T.F. Findley, Biomechanical comparison of treadmill and overground walking, in: Proceedings, Eighth Biennial Conference, Canadian Society for Biomechanics, Calgary, Canada, 18-20 August 1994, pp. 88-89.
4. J. Charteris and C. Taves, The process of habituation to treadmill walking: a kinematic analysis, Perceptual and Motor Skills 47 (1978), 659-666.
5. S. Ganjikia, N. Duval, L. Yahia and J.A. de Guise, 3-D analyzer validation by simple fluoroscopic study, The Knee 7(4) (2000), 221-231.
6. E.S. Grood and W.J. Suuntay, A joint system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 105 (1983), 136-144.
7. R. Kobylarz, Overground vs treadmill running, Sports Health 8(2) (1990), 33-34.
8. M.P. Murray, G.B. Spurr, S.B. Sepic, G.M. Gardner and L.A. Mollinger, Treadmill vs. floor walking: kinematics, electromyogram, and heart rate, Journal of Applied Physiology 59(1) (1985), 87-91.
9. B.M. Nigg, R.W. De Boer and V. Fisher, A kinematic comparison of overground and treadmill running, Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 27(1) (1995), 98-105.
10. D.K. Ramsay and P.F. Wretenberg, Biomechanics of the knee: methodological considerations in the in vivo kinematic analysis of the tibiofemoral and patellofemoral joint, Clinical Biomechanics 14 (1999), 595-611.
11. M. Sati, J.A. de Guise, S. Larouche and G. Drouin, Improving in vivo knee kinematic measurements: application to prosthetic ligament analysis, The Knee 3 (1996), 179-190.
12. M. Sati, J.A. de Guise, S. Larouche and G. Drouin, Quantitative assessment of skin-bone movement at the knee, The Knee 3 (1996), 121-138.
13. A.G. Schache, P.D. Blanch, D.A. Rath, T.V. Wrigley, R. Starr and K.L. Bennell, A comparison of overground and treadmill running for measuring the three-dimensional kinematics of the lumbo-pelvic-hip complex, Clinical Biomechanics 16(8) (2001), 667-680.
14. H. Stolze, J.P. Kuhtz-Buschbeck, C. Mondwurf, A. Bozeck-Funcke, K. Jöhnk, G. Deuschl and M. Illert, Gait analysis during treadmill and overground locomotion in children and adults, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 105 (1997), 490-497.
15. J.C. Wall and J. Charteris, The process of habituation to treadmill walking at different velocities, Ergonomics 23(5) (1980), 425-435.
16. J.C. Wall and J. Charteris, Kinematic study of long-term habituation to treadmill walking, Ergonomics 24(7) (1981), 531-542.
17. D.A. Winter, Kinematic and kinetic patterns in human gait: variability and compensating effect, Human Movement Science 3 (1984), 51-76.