Differential impairment as an indicator of sex bias in DSM-IV criteria for four personality disorders

Psychological Assessment

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 492-496

  Boggs, Christina D ^a,j   Morey, Leslie C ^a   Shea, M Tracie ^b,f,g   Zanarini, Mary C ^c,i   Gunderson, John G ^c,i   Skodol, Andrew E ^d   Sanislow, Charles A ^e,h   Grilo, Carlos M ^e,h   McGlashan, Thomas H ^e,h  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c MCLEAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f BUTLER HOSPITAL   (United States)

^g BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

ⁱ HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^j DURHAM VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Diagnosis; DSM IV; Personality disorder; Sex bias

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPULSIVE PERSONALITY DISORDER; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEFENSE MECHANISM; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL DISEASE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERSONALITY DISORDER; SELF REPORT; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SEX DIFFERENTIATION;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; FEMALE; HUMAN ACTIVITIES; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; PREJUDICE; SELF ASSESSMENT (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; WORK;

EID: 30744477764     PISSN: 10403590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1040-3590.17.4.492     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cleary, T. A., Humphreys, L., Kendrick, S., & Wesman, A. (1975). Educational uses of tests with disadvantaged students. American Psychologist, 30, 15-41.
2. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
3. Garb, H. (1995). Sex bias and the diagnosis of borderline personality disorder. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 26, 526.
4. Gunderson, J., Shea, T., Skodol, A., McGlashan, T., Morey, L., Stout, R., et al. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Development, aims, design, and sample characteristics. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 300-315.
5. Henry, K. A., & Cohen, C. I. (1983). The role of labeling processes in diagnosing borderline personality disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 1527-1529.
6. Kaplan, M. (1983). A woman's view of the DSM-III American Psychologist, 38, 786-792.
7. Kass, F., Spitzer, R., & Williams, J. (1983). An empirical study of the issue of sex bias in the diagnostic criteria of DSM-III axis II personality disorders. American Psychologist, 38, 799-801.
8. Keller, M., Lavori, P., Friedman, B., Nielson, E., Endicott, J., McDonald-Scott, P., et al. (1987). The Longitudinal Interval Follow-up Evaluation. Archives of General Psychiatry, 44, 540-548.
9. Morey, L. C., Warner, M. B., & Boggs, C. D. (2002). Gender bias in the personality disorders criteria: An investigation of the five bias indicators. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24, 55-65.
10. Trull, T. J. (1995). Borderline personality disorder features in nonclinical young adults: I. Identification and validation. Psychological Assessment, 7, 33-41.
11. Weissman, M. M., & Bothwell, S. (1976). Assessment of social adjustment by patient self-report. Archives of General Psychiatry, 33, 1111-1115.
12. Widiger, T. A. (1998). Invited essay: Sex biases in the diagnosis of personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 12, 95-118.
13. Widiger, T. A., & Spitzer, R. (1991). Sex bias in the diagnosis of personality disorders: Conceptual and methodological issues. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 1-22.
14. Zanarini, M., Frankenburg, F., Sikel, A., & Yong, L. (1996). The Diagnostic Interview for DSM-IV Personality Disorders (DIPD-IV). Belmont, MA: McLean Hospital.
15. Zanarini, M., Skodol, A., Bender, D., Dolan, R., Sanislow, C., Schaefer, E., et al. (2000). The Collaborative Longitudinal Personality Disorders Study: Reliability of axis I and II diagnoses. Journal of Personality Disorders, 14, 291-299.