Mid-term results and patient perceptions of robotically-assisted coronary artery bypass grafting

Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 406-411

  DeRose Jr , Joseph J ^a   Balaram, Sandhya K ^a   Ro, Charles ^a   Swistel, Daniel G ^a   Singh, Varinder ^a   Wilentz, James R ^a   Todd, George J ^a   Ashton, Robert C ^a  

^a ST LUKE S ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Coronary artery bypass grafting; Off pump surgery; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERNAL MAMMARY ARTERY; INTERVIEW; LEARNING; LENGTH OF STAY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCEPTION; PERICARDIUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVASCULARIZATION; ROBOTICALLY ASSISTED CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; ROBOTICS; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TELEPHONE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 30744474952     PISSN: 15699293     EISSN: 15699293     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2004.103317     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. Dogan S, Aybek T, Andressen E, Byhahn C, Mierdl S, Westphal K, Matheis G, Moritz A, Wimmer-Greinecker G. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on cardiopulmonary bypass with robotically enhanced telemanipulation: report of forty-five cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2002;123:1125-1131.
2. Mohr FW, Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Gummert JF, Bucerius J, Jacobs S, Autschbach R. Computer-enhanced robotic cardiac surgery: experience in 148 patients. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2001;121:842-853.
3. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Loscher N, Vogel B, Ulmann C, Rauch T, Mohr FW. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced telemanipulation system. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:199-205.
4. Falk V, Fann JI, Grunenfelder J, Daunt D, Burdon TA. Endoscopic computer-enhanced beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;70:2029-2033.
5. Subramanian VA, Patel NU. Current status of MIDCAB procedure. Current Opinion in Cardiology 2001;16(5):268-270.
6. Trehan N, Malhotra R, Mishra Y, Shrivastva S, Kohli V, Mehta Y. Comparison of ministernotomy with minithoracotomy regarding postoperative pain and internal mammary artery characteristics. Heart Surgery Forum 2000;3(4):300-306.
7. Ng PC, Chua AN, Swanson MS, Koutlas TC, Chitwood WR Jr, Elbeery JR. Anterior thoracotomy wound complications in minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass. Ann Thorac Surg 2000;69(5):1338-1340.
8. Vassiliades TA. Atraumatic coronary artery bypass: technique and outcomes. Heart Surg Forum 2001;4:331-334.
9. Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d'Attellis N, Berrebi A, Cardon C, Ponzio O, Aupecle B, Relland JY. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1999;118:4-10.
10. Falk V, Diegeler A, Walther T, Loscher N, Vogel B, Ulmann C, Rauch T, Mohr FW. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting on the beating heart using a computer enhanced telemanipulation system. Heart Surg Forum 1999;2:199-205.
11. Tabaie HA, Graper WP, Reinbolt JA. Clinical investigation: endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with robotic assistance. Heart Surg Forum 2002;5(4)328-333.
12. Novick RJ, Fox SA, Kiaii BB, Stitt LW, Rayman R, Kodera K, Menkis AH, and Boyd WD. Analysis of the learning curve in telerobotic beating heart coronary artery bypass grafting: a 90 patient experience. Ann Thorac Surg 2003;76:749-753.