Renewable energy: Externality costs as market barriers

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 632-642

  Owen, Anthony D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Externalities; Market barriers; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; COSTS; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; MARKETING;

ENVIRONMENTAL EXTERNALITIES; EXTERNALITY COSTS; MARKET BARRIERS;

RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

COST; ENERGY RESOURCE; MARKET CONDITIONS; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

EID: 30744467151     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. S., Awerbuch, Determining the real cost: Why renewable power is more cost-competitive than previously believed Renewable Energy World 6, 2003 53-61
2. European Commission, 1998. ExternE-Externalities of Energy, Brussels.
3. European Commission, 2003. External Costs: Research Results on Socio-Environmental Damages Due to Electricity and Transport. Brussels.
4. Haites, E., Mullins, F., 2001. Linking domestic and industry greenhouse gas trading systems. Report prepared for EPRI, IEA and IETA.
5. Imperial College Centre for Energy Policy and Technology (ICCEPT), 2002. Assessment of technological options to address climate change. A Report to the Prime Minister's Strategy Unit, December.
6. International Energy Agency (IEA), 1989. Environmental emissions from energy technology systems: The total fuel cycle. In: Proceedings of IEA/ OECD Expert Seminar, Paris, 12-14 April 1989.
7. International Energy Agency (IEA), Experience Curves for Energy Technology Policy 2000 OECD/IEA, Paris
8. International Energy Agency (IEA), Creating Markets for Energy Technologies 2003 OECD/IEA Paris
9. International Energy Agency (IEA), World Energy Outlook 2003 2003 OECD/ IEA Paris
10. IPCC, Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate Change. Contribution of WGIII to the Second Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 1996 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
11. F., Missfeldt, J., Hauff, The role of economic instruments A.D., Owen, N., Hanley, The Economics of Climate Change 2004 Routledge, London
12. R., Newell, W., Pizer, Discounting the future: How much do uncertain rates increase valuations? Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46, 2003 52-71
13. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), 2003. Environmentally Related Taxes Database, http://www.oecd.org
14. A.D., Owen, Oil supply insecurity: Control versus damage costs Energy Policy 32, 2004 1879-1882
15. Pearce, D., 2002. Energy policy and externalities: An overview. Paper presented at an IEA Workshop on Energy Policy and Externalities: The Life Cycle Analysis Approach, Paris.
16. D., Pearce, The social cost of carbon and its policy implications Oxford Review of Economic Policy 19, 2003 362-384
17. C., Philibert, The economics of climate change and the theory of discounting Energy Policy 27, 1999 913-927
18. T., Sundqvist, What causes the disparity of electricity externality estimates Energy Policy 32, 2004 1753-1766
19. R.S.J., Tol, The marginal costs of carbon dioxide emissions: An assessment of the uncertainties Energy Policy 33, 2005 2064-2074
20. M.L., Weitzman, Gamma discounting The American Economic Review 91, 2001 260-271