Fabric Surface Roughness Evaluation Using Wavelet-Fractal Method: Part I: Wrinkle, Smoothness and Seam Pucker

Textile Research Journal

Volumn 75, Issue 11, 2005, Pages 751-760

  Kang, Tae Jin ^a   Kim, Soo Chang ^a   Sul, in Hwan ^a   Youn, Jae Ryoun ^a   Chung, Kwansoo ^b  

^a Seoul National University ^*

^b Seoul National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; FIR FILTERS; FRACTALS; FUNCTIONS; SCANNING; STATISTICAL METHODS; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; WAVELET TRANSFORMS;

FABRIC WRINKLE; MATHEMATICAL FUNCTIONS; SCANNING SYSTEM; SEAM PUCKER; SMOOTHNESS APPEARANCE; WAVELET-FRACTAL METHOD;

FABRICS;

SURFACE PROPERTY;

EID: 30744466902     PISSN: 00405175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0040517505058855     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AATCC Test Methods 88B-1996, Smoothness of Seams in Fabrics after Repeated Home Laundering, AATCC Technical Manual, 75, 112–115 (2000).
2. AATCC Test Methods 124-1996, Appearance of Fabrics after Repeated Home Laundering, AATCC Technical Manual, 75, 205–208 (2000).
3. AATCC Test Methods 128-1999, Wrinkle Recovery of Fabrics: Appearance Method, AATCC Technical Manual, 75, 213–214 (2000).
4. Amirbayat, J., and Alagha, M. J., Objective Assessment of Wrinkle Recovery by Means of Laser Triangulation, J. Textile Inst. 87, 349–355 (1996).
5. Daubechies, I., Orthonormal Bases of Compactly Supported Wavelets, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 41, 909–996 (1988).
6. Kang, T. J., Cho, D. H., and Kim, S. M., New Objective Evaluation of Fabric Smoothness Appearance, Textile Res. J. 71(5), 446–453 (2001).
7. Kang, T. J., and Lee, J. Y., Objective Evaluation of Fabric Wrinkles and Seam Puckers Using Fractal Geometry, Textile Res. J. 70(6), 469–475 (2000).
8. Latif-Amet, A., Ertüzün, A., and Erçil, A., An Efficient Method for Texture Defect Detection: Sub-band Domain Co-occurrence Matrices, Image Vision Comput. 18, 543–553 (2000).
9. Mandelbrot, B. B., “The Fractal Geometry of Nature,” Freeman, New York, pp. 14–43, 1983.
10. Na, Y. J., and Pourdeyhimi, B., Assessing Wrinkling Using Image Analysis and Replicate Standards, Textile Res. J. 65(3), 149–157 (1995).
11. Parra, C., Iftekharuddin, K., and Rendon, D., Wavelet Based Estimation of the Fractal Dimension in FBM Images, in “Proc. 1st International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering,” 533–536 (2003).
12. Peitgen, H. O., and Saupe, D. ed., “The Science of Fractal Images,” Springer-Verlag, New York, 1988.
13. Russ., J. C., “Fractal Surfaces,” Plenum Press, New York, 1994.
14. Stylios, G., and Sotomi, J. O., Investigation of Seam Pucker in Lightweight Synthetic Fabrics as an Aesthetic Property: Parts I, II, J. Textile Inst. 84, 593–610 (1993).
15. Wang, A. L., Yang, C. X., and Yuan, X. G., Evaluation of the Wavelet Transform Method for Machined Surface Topography Part I: Methodology Validation, Tribology Intl. 36, 517–526 (2003).
16. Wang, A.L., Yang, C.X., and Yuan, X.G., Evaluation of the Wavelet Transform Method for Machined Surface Topography Part II: Fractal Characteristic Analysis, Tribology Intl. 36, 527–535 (2003).
17. Xiong, F., Jiang, X. Q., Gao, Y., and Li, Z., Evaluation of Engineering Surfaces Using a Combined Fractal Modeling and Wavelet Analysis Method, Int. J. Mach. Tools Manufact. 41, 2187–2193 (2001).
18. Xu, B., and Reed, J. A., Instrumental Evaluation of Fabric Wrinkle Recovery, J. Textile Inst. 86, 129–135 (1995).