Evidence-based clinical practice: Dispelling the myths

Nutrition in Clinical Practice

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 294-302

  Hise, Mary E ^a   Kattelmann, Kendra ^b   Parkhurst, Melissa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL RESEARCH; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; REVIEW; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; INFORMATION SERVICE; LITERATURE; META ANALYSIS; RESEARCH; STANDARD;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; META-ANALYSIS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RESEARCH; REVIEW LITERATURE;

EID: 30744462691     PISSN: 08845336     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0115426505020003294     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.
2. Clarkson JE. Getting research into clinical practice - barriers and solutions. Caries Res. 2004;38:321-324.
3. Scott I, Heyworth R, Fairweather P. The use of evidence-based medicine in the practice of consultant physicians: Results of a questionnaire survey. Aust N Z J Med. 2000;30:319-326.
4. Thomas DE, Kukuruzovic R, Martino B, Chauhan SS, Elliott EJ. Knowledge and use of evidence-based nutrition: a survey of paediatric dietitians. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2003;16:315-322.
5. Smith R. Expanding medical nutrition therapy: an argument for evidence-based practices. J Am Diet Assoc. 2003;103:313-314.
6. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Br Med J. 1996;312:71-72.
7. Bucher HC, Guyatt GH, Cook DJ, Holbrook A, McAlister FA. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature XIX. Applying clinical trial results A. How to use an article measuring the effect of an intervention on surrogate end points. JAMA. 1999;282:771-778.
8. Moher D, Pham B, Jones A, et al. Does quality of reports of randomized trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? Lancet. 1998;352:609-613.
9. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, et al. Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach EBM. 2nd ed. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
10. Craig JC, Irwig LM, Stockler MR. Evidence-based medicine: useful tools for decision making. Med J Aust. 2001;174:248-253.
11. Landry MD, Sibbald WJ. From data to evidence: evaluative methods in evidence-based medicine. Respir Care. 2001;46:1226-1235.
12. Greer N, Mosser G, Logan G, Halaas G. A practical approach to evidence grading. Jt Comm J Qual Improv. 2000;26:700-712.
13. Myers EF, Pritchett E, Johnson EQ. Evidence-based practice guides vs. protocols: what's the difference? J Am Diet Assoc. 2001;101:1085-1090.
14. Heyland DK, Dhaliwal R, Drover JW, Gramlich L, Dodek P. Canadian clinical practice guidelines for nutrition support in mechanically ventilated, critically ill adult patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2003;27:355-373.
15. Koretz RL. Methods of meta-analysis: an analysis. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2002;5:467-474.
16. Borzak S, Ridker PM. Discordance between meta-analyses and large-scale randomized, controlled trials. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123:873-877.
17. Marik PE, Zaloga GP. Meta-analysis of parenteral nutrition versus enteral nutrition in patients with acute pancreatitis. BMJ. June 2, 2004. Available at: http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/cgi/content/short/bmj.38118.593900. 55v1. Accessed November 4, 2004.
18. Montejo JC, Zarazaga A, Lopez-Martinez J, et al. Immunonutrition in the intensive care unit. A systematic review and consensus statement. Clin Nutr. 2003;22:221-233.
19. Yanagawa T, Bunn F, Roberts I, Wentz R, Pierro A. Nutritional support for head-injured patients. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002:CD001530.
20. Braunschweig CL, Levy P, Sheean PM, Wang X. Enteral compared with parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. 2001;74:534-542.
21. Koretz RL, Lipman TO, Klein S. AGA technical review on parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology. 2001;121:970-1001.
22. Hunt DL, McKibbon KA. Locating and appraising systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:532-538.
23. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available at: www.cochrane.org. Accessed November 12, 2004.
24. Jadad AR, Cook DJ, Jones A, et al. Methodology and reports of systematic reviews and meta-analyses: a comparison of Cochrane reviews with articles published in paper-based journal. JAMA. 1998;280:278-280.
25. Field M, Lohr K. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program 8. Washington, DC: Institute of Medicine; 1990.
26. A.S.P.E.N. Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in adult and pediatric patients. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2002;26:1SA-138SA.
27. Stroud M, Duncan H, Nightingale J. Guidelines for enteral feeding in adult hospital patients. Gut. 2003;52:vii1-vii12.
28. Al-Omran M, Groof A, Wilke D. Enteral versus parenteral nutrition for acute pancreatitis (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 4. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2004.
29. McClave SA, Greene LM, Snider HL, et al. Comparison of the safety of early enteral vs parenteral nutrition in mild acute pancreatitis. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 1997;21:14-20.