Transgressive segregation for fruit quality traits in a cross between exotic and mutant genotypes of lycopersicon

New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 373-379

  Rodríguez, Gustavo R ^a   Pratta, Guillermo R ^a   Zorzoli, Roxana ^a   Picardi, Liliana A ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE ROSARIO   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Lycopersicon esculentum var. cerasiforme; Nor; Plant genetic resources; Shape; Shelf life; Tomato

Indexed keywords

FRUIT;

LYCOPERSICON; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM VAR. CERASIFORME;

EID: 30744456758     PISSN: 01140671     EISSN: 11758783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01140671.2005.9514373     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Azanza, F, Kim, D, Tanksley, SD, and Juvik, JA. 1995. Genes from Lycopersicon chmielewskii affecting tomato quality during fruit ripening. Theorical and Applied Genetics, 91:495–504.
2. Bartoszewski, G, Niedziela, A, Szwacka, M, and Niemirowicz-Szczytt, K. 2003. Modification of tomato taste in transgenic plants carrying a thaumathin gene from Thaumatococcus daniellii Benth. Plant Breeding, 122:347–351.
3. De Vicente, MC, and Tanksley, SD. 1993. QTL analysis of transgressive segregation in an interespecific tomato cross. Genetics, 134:585–596.
4. Elkind, Y, Cahaner, A, and Kedar, N. 1990. A mixed model for the effects of single gene, polygenes and their interaction on quantitative traits. 2. The effects of the nor gene and polygenes on tomato fruit softnees. Heredity, 64:205–213.
5. Eshed, Y, Gera, G, and Zamir, D. 1996. A genome-wide search for wild-species alleles that increase horticultural yield of processing tomatoes. Theorical and Applied Genetics, 93:877–886.
6. Goldenberg, JB, and von der Pahlen, A. 1966. Genetic and phenotypic correlation between weight and dry matter content of tomato fruits and their heredabilities. Boletín Genético, 2:1–15.
7. Grandillo, S, and Tanksley, SD. 1996. QTL analysis of horticultural traits differentiating the cultivated tomato from the closely related species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium. Theorical and Applied Genetics, 92:935–951.
8. Grandillo, S, Ku, HM, and Tanksley, SD. 1999. Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit and shape in tomato. Theorical and Applied Genetics, 99:978–987.
9. Kearsey, MJ, and Pooni, HS. 1996. The genetical analysis of quantitative traits, London:Chapman & Hall.
10. Kramer, MG, and Redenbaugh, K. 1994. Commercialization of a tomato with an antisense polygalacturonase gene:The FLAVR SAVR™ tomato story. Euphytica, 79:293–297.
11. Lippman, Z, and Tanksley, SD. 2001. Dissecting the genetic pathway to extreme fruit size in tomato using a cross between the small-fruit wild species Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium andL. esculentum var Giant Heirloom. Genetics, 158:413–422.
12. Lynch, M, and Walsh, B. 1998. Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits, Sunderland, MA, United States:Sinauer Associates, Inc.
13. Miller, JC, and Tanksley, SD. 1990. RFLP analysis of phylogenetic relationships and genetic variation in the genus Lycopersicon. Theorical and Applied Genetics, 80:437–448.
14. Moore, S, Vrebalov, J, Payton, P, and Giovannoni, J. 2002. Use of genomics tools to isolate key ripening genes and analyse fruit maturation in tomato. Journal of Experimental Botany, 53:2023–2030.
15. Mutschler, MA, Wolfe, DW, Cobb, ED, and Yourstone, KS. 1992. Tomato fruit quality and shelf life in hybrids heterozygous for the alc ripening mutants. HortScience, 27:352–355.
16. Ng, TJ, and Tigchelaar, EC. 1977. Action of the non-ripening (nor) mutant on fruit ripening of tomato. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science, 102:504–509.
17. Paterson, AH, Damon, S, Hewitt, JD, Zamir, D, Rabinowitch, HD, Lincoln, SE, Lander, ES, and Tanksley, SD. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits in tomato:comparison cross species, generations and environments. Genetics, 127:181–197.
18. Poysa, V. 1993. Use of Lycopersicon cheesmanii and L. chmielewskii to increase dry matter content of tomato fruit. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 73:273–279.
19. Pratta, G, Zorzoli, R, and Picardi, LA. 2000. Interacciones genéticas entre germoplasma silvestre y cultivado de Lycopersicon spp. con efectos sobre la calidad del fruto de tomate. Plant Genetic Resources Newsletter, 124:7–12.
20. Pratta, G, Zorzoli, R, and Picard, LA. 2003. Diallel analysis of production traits among domestic, exotic and mutant germplasms of Lycopersicon. Genetics and Molecular Research, 2:206–213.
21. Schuelter, AR, Finger, FL, Casali, VWD, Brommonschenkel, SH, and Otoni, WC. 2002. Inheritance and genetic linkage analysis of a firm-ripening tomato mutant. Plant Breeding, 121:338–342.
22. Shapiro, SS, and Wilk, MB. 1965. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika, 52:591–611.
23. Smith, CJS, Watson, CF, Ray, J, Bird, CR, Morris, PC, Schuch, W, and Grierson, D. 1988. Antisense RNA inhibition of polygalacturonase gene expression in transgenic tomatoes. Nature, 334:724–726.
24. Stevens, MA. 1986. Inheritance of tomato fruit quality components, Plant Breeding Review 4 35–100. AVI Publishing Co.
25. Tigchelaar, EC, McGlason, WB, and Buescher, RW. 1978. Genetic regulation of tomato fruit ripening. HortScience, 13:508–513.
26. Thompson, AJ, Tor, M, Barry, CS, Vrebalov, J, Orfila, C, Jarvis, MC, Giovannoni, JJ, Grierson, D, and Seymour, GB. 1999. Molecular and genetic characterization of a novel pleiotropic tomato-ripening mutant. Plant Physiology, 120:383–390.
27. Weller, JI, Soller, M, and Brody, T. 1988. Linkage analysis of quantitative traits in an interspecific cross of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum × Lycopersicon pimpinellifolium) by means of genetic markers. Genetics, 118:329–339.