Similarity study of serine proteases inhibitors

Molecular Diversity

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 81-83

  Perekhodtsev, Gleb D ^a  

^a Algodign LLC   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Binding affinity prediction; Computer aided drug design; Molecular similarity; Quantitative structure activity relationships (QSAR); Serine protease

Indexed keywords

BLOOD CLOTTING FACTOR 10A; SERINE PROTEINASE INHIBITOR; THROMBIN; TRYPSIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING AFFINITY; CALCULATION; ENZYME INHIBITION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

BINDING SITES; FACTOR XA; HUMANS; SERINE PROTEINASE INHIBITORS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; THROMBIN; TRYPSIN;

EID: 30744455992     PISSN: 13811991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11030-006-2153-0     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Ilies, M.A., Scozzafava, A. and Supuran, C.T., Therapeutic applications of serine protease inhibitors, Expert Opin. Ther. Patents, 12 (2002) 1181-1214.
2. Kitchen, D.B., Decornez, H., Furr, J.R. and Bajorath, J., Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications, Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov., 3 (2004) 935-949.
3. Bleicher, K.H., Bohm, H.-J., Muller, K. and Alanine, A.I., Hit and lead generation: Beyond high-throughput screening, Nat. Rev. Drug. Discov., 2 (2003) 369-378.
4. Joseph-McCarthy, D., An overview of in silico design and screening: Toward efficient drug discovery, Current Drug Discovery, 2 (2002) 20-23.
5. Sheridan, R.P. and Kearsley, S.K., Why do we need so many chemical similarity search methods?, Drug Discov. Today, 7 (2002) 903-911.
6. Martin, Y.C., Kofron, J.L. and Traphagen, L.M., Do structurally similar molecules have similar biological activity?, J. Med. Chem., 45 (2002) 4350-4358.
7. Brown, R.D. and Martin, Y.C., The information content of 2D and 3D structural descriptors relevant to ligand-receptor binding, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 37 (1997) 1-9.
8. Johnson, M.A. and Maggiora, G.M. (Eds.) Concepts and applications of molecular similarity, Wiley, New York, 1990.
9. Cash, G.G., Estimation of octanol-water partition coefficients from a molecular similarity parameter, Chemosphere, 33 (1996) 2081-2087.
10. Cash, G.G., Prediction of physicochemical properties from euclidean methods based on electrotopological state indices, Chemosphere, 39 (1999) 2583-2591.
11. Ghuloum, A.M., Sage, C.R. and Jain, A.N., Molecular hashkeys: A novel method for molecular characterization and its application for predicting important pharmaceutical properties of molecules, J. Med. Chem., 42 (1999) 1739-1748.
12. Basak, S.C. and Granwald, G.D., Tolerance space and molecular similarity, SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 3 (1995) 265-277.
13. Basak, S.C., Gute, B.D. and Granwald, G.D., Estimation of normal boiling points, Croat. Chem. Acta, 69 (1996) 1159-1173.
14. Gute, B.D. and Basak, S.C., Molecular similarity-based estimation of properties: A comparison of three structure spaces, J. Mol. Graph. Model., 20 (2001) 95-109.
15. Basak, S.C. and Gute, B.D., Quantitative molecular similarity methods in the property/toxicity estimation of chemicals, J. Mol. Struct. (Theochem), 622 (2003) 127-145.
16. Willett, P. and Winterman, V., Comparison of some measures for the determination of intermolecular structural similarity, Quant. Struct.-Activ. Rel. 5 (1986) 18-25.
17. Basak, S.C. and Gute, B.D., Use of graph theoretic parameters in predicting inhibition of microsomal p-hydroxylation of anilines by alcohols: A molecular similarity approach, In Johnson, B.L., Xintaras, C., and Andrews, J.S. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Congress on hazardous waste: Impact on human and ecological health, Princeton Scientific Publishing Co, Inc., Princeton, 1997, pp. 492-504.
18. Dixon, S.L. and Merz, K.M. Jr., One-dimensional molecular representations and similarity calculations: Methodology and validation, J. Med. Chem., 44 (2001) 3795-3809.
19. Accord for Microsoft Excel, version 5.0, Accelrys Inc., San Diego, CA, http://www.accelrys.com.
20. Willett, P., Barnard, J.M. and Downs, G.M., Chemical similarity searching, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 38 (1998) 983-996.
21. Brown, R.D. and Martin, Y.C., Use of structure-activity data to compare structure-based clustering methods and descriptors for use in compound selection, J. Chem. Inf. Comp. Sci., 36 (1996) 572-584.
22. Muryshev, A.E., Tarasov, D.N., Butygin, A.V., Butygina, O.Yu., Aleksandrov, A.B. and Nikitin, S.M., A novel scoring function for molecular docking, J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 17 (2003) 597-605.
23. Bissantz, C., Folkers, G. and Rognan, D., Protein-based virtual screening of chemical databases. 1. Evaluation of different docking/scoring combinations, J. Med. Chem., 43 (2000) 4759-4767.