Productivity, impact and publication habits by gender in the area of materials science

Scientometrics

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 199-218

  Mauleón, Elba ^a   Bordons, María ^a  

^a Centro de Ciencias Humanas y Sociales   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 30744450730     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0014-3     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. ABBOT, A. (2000), Italian women meet glass ceiling in the lab, Nature, 408 : 21-28.
2. BORDONS, M., MORILLO, F., FERNANDEZ, M. T., GOMEZ, I. (2003), One step further in the production of bibliometric indicators at the micro level: Differences by gender and professional, Scientometrics, 57: 159-173.
3. BIOSOFT SAS (2001), Development of Bibliometric Indicators by Gender. Final report under European Commission's contract ERBHPV2-CT-1999-14N.
4. COLE, J. R., ZUCKERMAN, H. (1984), The productivity puzzle: persistence and change in patterns of publication of men and women scientists, Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 2 : 217-258.
5. DEWANDRE, N. (2002), European strategies for promoting women in science, Science, 295 : 278-279.
6. ETAN EXPERT WORKING GROUP ON WOMEN AND SCIENCE (2000), Science Policy in the European Union. Promoting Excellence through Mainstreaming Gender Equality. European Commission. Directorate -General for Research. Brussels, http/www.cordis.lu/improving/women/documents.htm
7. ETZKOWITZ, H., KEMELGOR, C., UZZI, B. (2000), Athena Unbound: The Advancement of Women in Science and Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
8. FERNANDEZ, M. T., CABRERO, A., ZULUETA, M. A., GOMEZ, I. (1993), Constructing a relational database for bibliometric analysis, Research Evaluation, 3 : 55-62.
9. GARFIELD, E. (1992-1993), Essays of an Information Scientist: of Nobel class, Women in Science, Citation Classics and Other Essays, 15 : 248.
10. GOEL, K. (2002), Gender differences in publication productivity in psychology in India, Scientometrics, 55 : 243-258.
11. GUPTA, M., KUMAR, S., AGGARWAL, B. S. (1999), A comparison of productivity of male and female scientists of CSIR, Scientometrics, 45 : 269-289.
12. th International Conference on Scientometrics and Infomietrics. Bibliometric and Informetric Research Group. University of New South Wales. Sydney, pp. 275-285.
13. KYVIK. S., TEIGEN, M. (1996), Child care, research collaboration and gender differences in scientific productivity, Science Technology and Human Values, 21 : 54-71.
14. LAAFIA, I., LARSSON, A. (2001), Women in Public Research and Higher Education in Europe. Statistics in focus. Science and Technology, Theme 9-7.
15. LEMOINE, W. (1992), Frequency distribution of research papers and patents according to sex: The case of CSIR, India, Scientometrics, 24 : 449-469.
16. LEWISON, G. (2001), The quantity and quality of female researchers: a bibliometric study of Iceland. Scientometrics, 52 : 29-43.
17. LONG, J. S. (1992), Measures of sex differences in scientific productivity, Social Forces, 71 : 159-178.
18. MAIRESSE, J., TURNER, L. (2002), A look at individual differences in scientific research productivity: an econometric analysis of the publications of the French CNRS physicists in condensed matter (1980-1997). In: Proceedings of the Conference «Rethinking Science Policy: Analytical Frameworks for Evidence-based Policy». SPRU, Brighton, pp. 21-23.
19. PALOMBA, R., MENNITI, A. (Eds) (2001), Minerva's Daughters. Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies. Rome.
20. PRPIC, K. (2002), Gender and productivity differentials in science, Scientometrics, 55 : 27-58.
21. RENNIE, D., YANK, V., EMANUEL, L. (1997), When authorship fails. A proposal to make contributors accountable, JAMA, 278 : 579-585.
22. THE HELSINKI GROUP ON WOMEN AND SCIENCE (2002), National Policies on Women and Science in Europe. European Commission. Directorate - General for Research. Brussels. http://www.cordis.lu/improving/women/policies.htm
23. WEBSTER, B. M. (2001), Polish women in science: a bibliometric analysis of Polish science and its publications. 1980-1999, Research Evaluation, 10: 185-194.
24. WENNERAS, C., WOLD, A. (1997), Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387 : 341-343.
25. WOMEN IN SCIENCE: What do the indicators reveal? (2003), Third European Report on Science & Technology Indicators. pp. 257-269.
26. XIE, Y., SHAUMAN, K. A. (1998), Sex differences in research productivity: new evidence about an old puzzle, American Sociological Review, 63 : 847-870.