Soil factor effects on tolerance of two corn (Zea mays) hybrids to isoxaflutole plus flufenacet

Weed Technology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 599-604

  Steckel, Lawrence E ^b   William Simmons, F ^b   Sprague, Christy L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Acetamide; Crop safety; Isoxazole; Phytotoxicity; Soil om; Soil ph

Indexed keywords

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 30744440709     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2003)017[0599:SFEOTO]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bhowmik, P. C. and R. G. Prostak. 1996. Activity of EXP 31130A in annual weed control in field corn. Weed Sci. Soc. Am. Abstr. 36:13.
2. Carmer, S. G., W. E. Nyquist, and W. M. Walker. 1989. Least significant differences for combined analysis of experiments with two or three-factor treatment designs. Agron. J. 81:665-672.
3. Forester, H., R. R. Schmidt, and R. Andree. 1997. FOE-5043 a new selective herbicide from the oxyacetamide group. Pflanzenschutz Nachr. Bayer. 50: 105-116.
4. Gajbhiye, V. T. and S. Gupta. 2001. Adsorption-desorption behaviour of flu- fenacet in five different soils of India. Pest Manag. Sci. 57:633-639.
5. Lee, D. L., M. P. Prisbylla, T. H. Cromartie, D. P. Dagarin, S. W. Howard, W. M. Provan, M. K. Ellis, T. Fraser, and L. C. Mutter. 1997. The discovery and structural requirements of inhibitors of p-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenases. Weed Sci. 45:601-609.
6. McIntosh, M. S. 1983. Analysis of combined experiments. Agron. J. 75:153-155.
7. Mitra, S. and P. C. Bhowmik. 2001. Physical and chemical properties of soil influence the sorption of the diketonitrile metabolite of isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. 49:423-430.
8. Mitra, S., P. C. Bhowmik, and B. Xing. 1999. Sorption of isoxaflutole by five different soils varying in physical and chemical properties. Pestic. Sci. 55:935-942.
9. Pallett, K. E., S. M. Cramp, J. P. Little, P. Veerasedaran, A. J. Crudace, and A. E. Slater. 2001. Isoxaflutole: the background to its discovery and the basis of its herbicidal properties. Pest Manag. Sci. 57:133-142.
10. Pallett, K. E., J. P. Little, M. Sheekey, and P. Veerasekaran. 1998. The mode of action of isoxaflutole. I. Physiological effects, metabolism, and selectivity. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 62:113-124.
11. Rowe, L. and D. Penner. 1990. Factors affecting choloracetanilide injury to corn. Weed Technol. 4:904-906.
12. [SAS] Statistical Analysis Systems. 2000. SAS User's Guide. Version 8.1. Cary, NC: Statistical Analysis Systems Institute. Pp. 235-237.
13. Sprague, C. L., J. J. Kells, and D. Penner. 1999a. Weed control and corn (Zea Mays) tolerance from soil-applied RPA 201772. Weed Technol. 13:713-725.
14. Sprague, C. L., J. J. Kells, and D. Penner. 1999b. Enhancing margin of selectivity of RPA 201772 in corn (Zea mays) with antidotes. Weed Sci. 47:492-497.
15. Sprague, C. L., J. J. Kells, and D. Penner. 1999c. Physiological basis for differential corn (Zea mays) tolerance of four corn hybrids to isoxaflutole. Weed Sci. 47:631-635.
16. Taylor-Lovell, S., G. K. Sims, L. M. Wax, and J. J. Hassett. 2000. Hydrolysis and soil adsorption of the labile herbicide isoxaflutole. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34:3186-3190.
17. Viger, P. R., C. V. Eberlein, E. P. Fuerst, and J. W. Gronwald. 1991. Effects of CGA-154281 and temperature on metolachlor absorption and metabolism, glutathione content, and glutathione-S transferase activity in corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 39:324-328.